User information for Plo***

Real Name
Plo***
Nickname
Plo***
Email
Concealed by request
Description
Banned
Homepage
None given.

Supporter

Signed On
September 5, 2024
Total Posts
6 (Suspect)
User ID
60392
Search For:
Sort Results:
Ascending
Descending
Limit Results:
 
6 Comments. 1 pages. Viewing page 1.
Newer [  1  ] Older
13.
 
Re: removed
Sep 5, 2024, 11:30
13.
Re: removed Sep 5, 2024, 11:30
Sep 5, 2024, 11:30
 
Burrito of Peace wrote on Sep 5, 2024, 11:27:
Having read your post before it got whacked, please enlighten us all on how your comment directly correlated to the cybersecurity issues that Planned Parenthood is currently facing.

Which is what the link was about and nothing else.
It was a reply to another commenter. The comment software here allows for replying to others.

In fact, point ONE of the FAQ's "ground rules for forum posts" says: "Disagree all you want but refrain from attacks of a personal nature. Criticize the post, not the poster."

That is LITERALLY, EXACTLY what I did. And yet my post was removed for being a "shitpost".

I'm looking at you, Blue.

Edit: in fact, I just got called a "troll" and "asshat" by RedEye9, in violation of the ground rules.

My "sense" continues to look more and more true. I didn't say "be better" to troll. I said it because it needed said.
11.
 
Re: Evening Safety Dance
Sep 5, 2024, 11:22
11.
Re: Evening Safety Dance Sep 5, 2024, 11:22
Sep 5, 2024, 11:22
 
RedEye9 wrote on Sep 5, 2024, 11:21:
Yes, please be better and hit this obvious trolling asshat w/the ban hammer.

That you disagree with what I say does not make me a troll, nor an asshat.
9.
 
Re: removed
Sep 5, 2024, 11:18
9.
Re: removed Sep 5, 2024, 11:18
Sep 5, 2024, 11:18
 
Blue wrote on Sep 5, 2024, 11:14:
Plorfy wrote on Sep 5, 2024, 11:10:
I'm getting a real sense of "only moderator-approved opinions allowed" here.
I'm getting a sense that you just walked in here off the street to comment on a non-gaming story and then attack my integrity.

Which of our senses is more spot on?

An on-topic comment (even if you disagree), on a site which allows (and thus invites) comments? How dare I.

Seems it's mine who is more spot on. Be better, Blue.
7.
 
Re: removed
Sep 5, 2024, 11:10
7.
Re: removed Sep 5, 2024, 11:10
Sep 5, 2024, 11:10
 
Blue wrote on Sep 5, 2024, 11:09:
Plorfy wrote on Sep 5, 2024, 11:04:
I would like to know how this was a shitpost.

Was something incorrect about it? I don't believe there was.
This is a story about cyber security. You can find plenty of other websites that welcome discussion of your opinions on reproductive rights. But here it's just hijacking a thread.

So then how is RedEye's post not similarly a shitpost? I'm getting a real sense of "only moderator-approved opinions allowed" here.
5.
 
Re: removed
Sep 5, 2024, 11:04
5.
Re: removed Sep 5, 2024, 11:04
Sep 5, 2024, 11:04
 
I would like to know how this was a shitpost.

Was something incorrect about it? I don't believe there was.
3.
 
removed
Sep 5, 2024, 10:44
3.
removed Sep 5, 2024, 10:44
Sep 5, 2024, 10:44
 
* REMOVED *

This comment was deleted on Sep 5, 2024, 10:47. Reason: Shitpost
6 Comments. 1 pages. Viewing page 1.
Newer [  1  ] Older