Burrito of Peace wrote on Dec 8, 2016, 11:17:
Bard wrote on Dec 8, 2016, 11:09:
Cloud computing is a stupid idea.
...
+1
All this plus you're wholly dependent on the provider's "security" which is completely out of your control.
Where I work now decided a couple of years back that they were going "in the cloud". Guess what we're doing now? Bringing everything back in-house with real hardware.
The "cloud": a buzzword from the early 2000's widely circulated in CEO-subscribed publications, replaced today by "IoT".
I recall one such CEO circa 2006 asking me what I thought about everyone moving to "the cloud" in the next few years. I told him that he'd been using "the cloud" since sending his first email twenty years ago and that onsite services will always be faster, more secure and good luck uploading - on the pathetic upstream connection - his 20GB mailbox of items never to be deleted or archived.
That being said, where clients insist on cloud services I do enjoy not having to deal with Exchange's new release bugs or having to apologize on behalf of Microsoft for the spike in labour charges that month (or eat the costs myself for managed clients).
100% agree with the comment about shitty web consoles, which are a cost cutting measure to avoid creating platform-specific client applications. Office 365 seems to change their console according to the Assassin's Creed release schedule, so hopefully we have a reprieve for a year or two before the hunt for buried features begins anew.
Even with cloud services in place, I still adhere to the 3-2-1 backup principle, with
local components. I often pose the question to clients, "what recourse do you have if MS or Google lose your data?". 6-7 years back Google lost days worth of Blogger posts after having to perform a server rollback.
Google.
Cloud security/relability/integrity is a vague promise, about as transparent as Jennifer Lawrence's face mask.