i have had a gmail since they were invite only and would switch to xmail on day one. google deserves its twilight.

that having been said, i seen xmail mentioned on X but not by Elon, and did an internet search for details. top was a web to enter your email to express your interest that looked spammy to me.

God bless Elon and the United States of America.

I thought the real X advertisers story was that there was a small international "middle man" grifter organization was organizing advertising boycotts to coerce X into limiting free speech and promoting false narrative upon the American people and the world at large.

i put 280 hours into the game at which point i had 100% complete progression. a big part of the fun was collecting samples and the only point of doing helldive difficulty was to collect more samples per run. now all my samples and requisition are maxed out with nothing to spend it on. nothing to unlock, no progression. the warbonds are great but not enough to hold my interest at this time.

that having been said: it was 280 hours of fun until i ran out of content and hit a wall. i imagine a high percentage of players agree and this is what's going on.

i really wish they would focus on secure multiplayer for PC with increasing depth, as an example in 5 i think there was the royale mode where the tanks needed fuel, so keep developing things like that. building fortifications, unlocks and progression, cosmetics. a cheat free environment is crucial.

2042 has been fun for me, but i just dont understand the choice of near future over 2142's great setting. 2142 had much better gadgets, like magnetic mines that chased vehicles, mini rocket launcher gun attachments, etc, mech vehicles on the map similar to ed-209. would be so very happy with a 2142 and Vietnam remaster. also always bringing back the best maps such as sharqi and karkland. tbh random map gen for battlefield would be amazing.

ive been playing since 2004 with Vietnam. 2142 was slammed as bad at release but was a great game. Bad Company should be a separate series in the battlefield universe with its own team and focused on single player content if it was up to me. i dont think the commander was ever the same after that title. when bc came out it threatened battlefield as a PC game and turning it into a console game is how i recall it. but lots of people love that one so why not make it the premier single player milsim experience.

$60?

i am waiting to see how they do with the cheating; in bf5 it was so bad i had to take a break and when i came back it was worse

there is no point in playing it until they get a handle on that aspect

im also disappointed in the setting, i played 2142 and wanted to see more or that, with mechs, rocket attachments, magnetic mines etc

why they chose 2042 near future is baffling

if they can't control the cheating I am not even gonna bother. Sucks to be EA Dice, but if they can't control it there is no point. I believe they can.

in reference to the posted video i was commenting on

these people really want a war with Russia... or do they want to leave the bread crumbs leading to Russia and not China?

Bounties would be a very bad thing, but the best counter is how many soldiers are actually dying?

Russia has a population of 130 million compared to United States 330 million.

until they can get a grip on the cheaters im out

2143 or Vietnam 2 would make it harder on me

if they went back to BF2 era with a good commander mode, and brought back maps like Karkland and Sharqi it would be tough!

i been playing Warzone since they announced massive targeting of cheaters, and like Plunder, but regular CoD multi is never gonna win me over.

i dunno, gulag is really nothing special. what is imo is plunder, teams of 3 and you can respawn on death, a teamkill forces you to drop somewhere else, and no circle.

they just added a solo royale with the circle where you can respawn as long as you have enough cash from the round which is also good.

i dont think i will be playing the 1 life and gulag matches anymore.

also for the prices and release schedule, i dont see me actually buying any call of duty games either, ha. the good thing is it has gotten me away from Battlefield, where the cheating is rampant and they are winning the cheaters war.

im glad they did the free weekend, i was on the fence about buying it but was encouraged when they mentioned their anti cheat efforts. CoD multiplayer was just how i remember it, twitchy arcade fun with limited tactics. spawns might come from any direction so getting shot in the back is common.

im a fan of crossplay support but i wonder how much reticle snapping to target helps the controller crowd, i seen many replays of players who never miss their shot with say the magnum. this does not make me angry as a cheater would, i think its funny so no big deal.

just read an article where PS4 players are disabling crossplay to purge their platform of PC players who cheat, which puts into question the staying power of this title as a multiplayer game, especially with a rumoured CoD 2020 out in fall. merry go round title, great if this is your favorite game but i am in between, i like the tactics in Battlefield but am put off by the cheating so much im not sure i will be onboard for the next version.

battlefield player here, love to see COD being proactive against cheaters.

i first seen this idea in titanfall 2, merging the cheaters into their own server which imo is the best course of action.

i have taken the oath, no more battlefield games until the cheaters are handled. unless its vietnam or 2143.

i was tempted to buy MW but i dunno, $40 is a bit steep during the plague and i already bought bannerlord. last COD i bought was BO1, and i heard a new version COD2020 is already around the corner reminding me why i dont like COD.

got this for $3

its pretty accurate to earn 1 level per hour of play.

i hit the level cap of 30 right when they released the new york DLC which i did not get, at least not yet

it is great fun, somewhat reminded me of stalker. its a loot game to the point of ridiculousness. what i really do not like is to get better and better gear and level up does not matter at all, the world levels up as well and thus there is really no point. at level 30 and current gear any mission an enemy can still kill you rather easily with a few shots. it made it all dumb to me.

possibly to cheat someone of their kills?

kills are odd in Royale, in BFV my current assignment includes get 25 kills in Firestorm which is taking a long while. in any other game mode that would be 3 matches tops.

loved Titanfall 2, and i played Apex one session, i am quite enjoying BFV and Firestorm is great, but i just love how they are mass banning the cheats in Apex. i am not confident they are doing anything to cheaters in BFV, maybe i will switch to Apex

looks awesome, im excited for this mode

for me, BFV is shaping up to be the best since BF2

never played much 1942, but i have played them all except the XBOX games (BC1 and 2),

my favorites were BF2, BFV(ietnam), and 2142

3, 4, and 1 were all good just those for me were better

seems like there was turmoil after BF2 when they removed the Commander and ruined squads

BF2, BFV, or 2142 were all awesome

BF5 is coming along well

Firestorm looks fantastic, the squad arty in Rush reminds me of BF2

i STILL miss the commander mode in all the best games

BC2 fans i dunno... it was BF2 for consoles

cant really comment on the new patch, still downloading the 4.4 gig patch. changing frontlines to 16 player kinda sucks as it is my favorite game mode.

conquest is boring imo, and grand operations is kind of meh... it is laggy and spammy. i am not sure if it is the aircraft, which i like being there but are missing in frontlines. personally i rarely use planes and tanks in any battlefield game i have played. i probably used the LAV in 2 the most.

the maps i think are great in frontlines, where they are broken down into sections that makes it more interesting than having to run around in circles in the other modes, in particular conquest. i want to see more tactics and less "flanking," if we can use that term because it usually feels more cheap than tactical.

in conquest, you always have that 1 guy who will cross the map to cap a flag when no one is there, or more likely a pilot who bails on an unprotected flag.

building is a great addition to the series. i also like that while support can hand out bullets, you have to replenish grenades from a depot near a flag.

i think much of the uproar over this game was people projecting onto the hype at launch. i think i got this the first time it hit $20 or maybe $30. there was base building when i started.

the game is great fun, albeit tedious at times. and the way they are adding content i am sure i will be playing it for years to come.

i think i heard a rumor that they will add VR at some point, which would be just about perfect.

i was motivated to post by the silly first comment about building the game on a lie... lol. if i remember right there was 1 video pre-release that suggested multiplayer or large space creatures that was not in launch.

i would counter this is a good example of people repeating what they have heard just for the sake of doing so.

it was always going to be an MMO, it was always going to have a cash store for optional support. but... my grief was with the "limited" edition ships and LTI being rather worthless and not collectable even if some of the impulse buys i made in 2013 implied that they were.

there will probably be between 2 and 5 million LTI ships in the game at launch, and the only one at this point that is rare is the Phoenix for whatever reason.