Beamer wrote on Aug 23, 2018, 10:34:
But Twitter is the middle ground. Those that it kicked off went to Gab, who are, well, proving why they were kicked off. No "middle ground" people have been kicked off.

Though, if you're wondering why Twitter seems a bit left, perhaps it's because Twitter tends to be younger and more educated, and younger and more educated America tends to be left? Perhaps Twitter reflects the majority? At least, if you ignore the idiots on the very far side that get angry over anything, but there's typically 5 of them with 10 followers and no one pays attention until the idiots at TumblrInAction start amplifying it by doing the exact thing the Twitter idiots first thought was happening.

Beamer wrote on Aug 23, 2018, 08:56:
snip

Beamer wrote on Aug 23, 2018, 07:23:
I read nothing wrong. You've been arguing about the numbers while claiming to be arguing about bias.

It's odd, and kind of weasely. "Why did the media say the numbers were greater?!" Well, because they were. "Yeah, but why did they say that?" Because it was factually accurate? "No it wasn't!" It was. "Ok, but that's because protestors blocked the entrances, and no one showed it."

Yes, no one, not even Fox News. You'd think, had this been an issue, Fox would have been all about it. Your proof that it occurred is a poorly shot video of one entrance. Even if one entrance was blocked, there were dozens, as evidenced by all the people walking by past the gate. And there were cops. Were cops in on this, too?

Sepharo wrote on Aug 22, 2018, 14:49:
I think you'd be a lot less misled if you cut down on the amount of "evidence" you get from youtube videos.

RedEye9 wrote on Aug 22, 2018, 09:45:

djinn wrote on Aug 22, 2018, 06:42:
...someone who'd won the vote

President Hillary Rodham Clinton won the vote.

President Hillary Rodham Clinton 65,853,516 48%
dRumpf 62,984,825 46%

Sepharo wrote on Aug 21, 2018, 14:28:
Why did you make a mile long post about peculiarities in ground photos when there are aerial photos, both taken from peak attendance, that clearly show the difference?

Beamer wrote on Aug 21, 2018, 08:18:
I mean, you know even the White House admitted there were fewer people there in person over a year ago. You were here fighting a fight even Trump himself conceded. But you say you're usually well informed.

For some reason, it seems like the pro-Trump people here are usually the opposite of that. That, or they think being "informed" is watching YouTube videos from individuals and thinking that's how to be reliably informed. Actually, kind of wagering that's you. But that's two big pro-Trump posters in two days admitting that they don't know what they're talking about and, rather than saying "hey, wonder if there's anything else I'm ill-informed about that I have very strong opinions on," they double down with "but actually, the Left is the one that's misinforming!"

NKD wrote on Aug 19, 2018, 12:19:
If they are using an image of peak attendance, it's very hard to accuse them of any bias in image choice.

Red886 wrote on Aug 19, 2018, 08:55:
"fake news" is more about selective reporting, nip-picking facts, deliberate omissions, bias in choice of narrative, lack of critical analysis, mixing of editorials with fact-based news, deliberate misuse of context or the lack of it, and even the choice made to run which news at which hour.

it was not about news where fake numbers or events are made up.

RedEye9 wrote on Aug 19, 2018, 08:32:
snip

Saboth wrote on Aug 19, 2018, 06:56:
Trump and his tribe keep saying this, but when pressed over what exact news stories are fake, not a single one has managed to provide evidence of it. They seem to be operating on the "keep telling a lie enough times and people will believe it" assumption. If all of their news is fake, or even 10%, it should be easy to prove, but none have done so.

ventry wrote on Feb 15, 2018, 20:29:
So, is this "impeachment" following the same timeline as those nukes I am to be expecting??

Keep crying it's amusing.

The Half Elf wrote on Oct 24, 2017, 17:06:

djinn wrote on Oct 24, 2017, 11:24:

The Half Elf wrote on Oct 24, 2017, 11:14:
You mean like how GTA 4 and 5 have it on PC and somehow everything is still ok in the universe?

Gta5 had aim assist with mouse/keyboard?

No and neither does this.

The Half Elf wrote on Oct 24, 2017, 11:14:
You mean like how GTA 4 and 5 have it on PC and somehow everything is still ok in the universe?

Prez wrote on Apr 28, 2017, 21:06:
While I thought Unreal was amazing, it still felt like a game, albeit an engrossing one. Half-Life though - with the incredible cohesiveness of the narrative experienced through the gripping gameplay felt like an adventure. A wonderful experience. I couldn't really tell you anything about Unreal other than it was amazing-looking (at the time obviously) and tons of fun. But I can remember almost every detail of Black Mesa, the genius encounters, and Xen to this day.