Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
User Settings
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:
Chicago, IL 11/17

Regularly scheduled events

User information for Droniac

Real Name Droniac   
Search for:
Sort results:   Ascending Descending
Limit results:
Nickname None given.
Email Concealed by request - Send Mail
ICQ None given.
Signed On May 12, 2011, 07:42
Total Comments 23 (Suspect)
User ID 56657
User comment history
< Newer [ 1 2 ] Older >

News Comments > JackHammer Announced
7. Re: JackHammer Announced Jul 18, 2017, 17:24 Droniac
How is this supposed to compete with Lawbreakers, Quake Champions, Unreal Tournament, Diabotical, etc? Based on the video and Steam page, this seems to be offering essentially just less of everything? Much smaller arenas that are entirely open, a single weapon, no pickups. The customization might be interesting, but if that affects gameplay, it also affects balance.

It reminds me a little of Shootmania. That also tried to strip down the arena FPS experience to much less than its base components. It didn't work.
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > Splash Damage and Wargaming Collaboration
4. Re: Splash Damage and Wargaming Collaboration Jul 18, 2017, 12:21 Droniac
grudgebearer wrote on Jul 18, 2017, 11:03:
I guess this means Splash Damage wants to make a game that will be worse than Dirty Bomb?

Dirty Bomb was made in collaboration with Nexon, which certainly doesn't rate any better than Wargaming...

Dirty Bomb still turned out to be a good game though. It just needs more work (mainly bug fixing and additional content). A bit silly that it's still in beta after so many years, but that beta tag is unfortunately still warranted.
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > Star Citizen Bank Loan Follow-up
26. Re: Star Citizen Bank Loan Follow-up Jun 26, 2017, 14:24 Droniac
Cutter wrote on Jun 26, 2017, 13:56:
Smart has actially managed to make and ship a few games. Roberts? Still sitting at ZERO.

You may wish to edit his Wikipedia page to reflect this, because it seems to disagree with you.
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > Star Citizen Bank Loan Follow-up
22. Re: Star Citizen Bank Loan Follow-up Jun 26, 2017, 13:50 Droniac
Timmeh wrote on Jun 26, 2017, 11:03:
Not me...

Derek Smart is well Derek Smart but he is a pretty straight shooter and he made and released games that didn't bilk suckers for 250m for virtual nothingness.

And before anyone "Smarts off" about his games. They are pretty fun if your into the space sim style.

You might want to look into things a little more deeply in future?

Star Citizen is nowhere near 250m (yet), although 152m is an incredible amount still.

Derek Smart has in fact worked on an ongoing early access production that's been in development for at least 3-4 years longer than Star Citizen's crowdfunding campaign has existed and is still nowhere near done. It was even sold on Steam and GamersGate at some point, until user reviews came in and it turned out that no one liked his product or thought it was anywhere near release, so he pulled it. It's still on sale on its own website though... raking in those sucker dollars.

This game is called Line of Defense and was announced in early 2011, for release later that year. It's a multi-platform combined arms MMO. In other words: it's multi-platform Star Citizen.

It's currently in worse state than what's playable of Star Citizen. Many of its promised features are still missing, several of which are already functional in Star Citizen or have already been seen in live demos for Star Citizen. Large parts of production are stopped and in terms of visuals it appears to be a strong competitor to PlanetSide 1. Production in the last year appears to have consisted predominantly of bug fixes and quality of life improvements, rather than finishing the game.

Really, if you read his rants about CIG/Star Citizen as misrepresented self-reflection pieces, then suddenly it all makes a lot more sense.
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > The Secret World to Relaunch
10. Re: The Secret World to Relaunch Mar 1, 2017, 21:17 Droniac
HorrorScope wrote on Mar 1, 2017, 17:43:
Creston wrote on Mar 1, 2017, 09:08:
As with any business model adjustments there is a significant risk attached to this change

You mean the risk of re-releasing a game that few people wanted to play originally? Yeah. I'm not sure I'd call it a "risk" so much as "probably setting money on fire."

Sounds like a call to players... this is the last chance and if you don't respond we're pullin the plug soon.

No, it doesn't look that way.

The financial report does seem to indirectly indicate Age of Conan and Anarchy Online entering a kind of maintenance mode. Specifically both games are mentioned with statements of: "No further significant work is expected to be done on this project going forward."

The revamp for The Secret World seems to be a genuine effort to appeal to a broader audience with their most profitable and interesting MMO. They've apparently invested heavily into this move (and Conan Exiles), which isn't very surprising. Business model & game revamps have worked well before in the MMO genre: Dungeons & Dragons Online, Lord of the Rings Online, Star Wars: The Old Republic, Star Trek Online, DC Universe Online, The Elder Scrolls Online, Final Fantasy XIV...
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > Pillars of Eternity II: Deadfire Announced
26. Re: Pillars of Eternity II: Deadfire Announced Jan 27, 2017, 05:38 Droniac
Cutter wrote on Jan 27, 2017, 00:13:
Sez who?

Steam user reviews. Over 8000 of them.

Cutter wrote on Jan 27, 2017, 00:13:
Most of the opinions I've seen on the matter agree it sucks.

Confirmation bias.

The game is rated 89 on Metacritic. Most reviewers seem to say it's very good.
The game is rated Very Positive with 8000+ reviews on Steam. Most players seem to think it's good.

Cutter wrote on Jan 27, 2017, 00:13:
There's just been a real lack of real quality classic CRPGs IMO. Divinity was bleh, Wasteland 2 bleh, Tyranny bleh, PoE bleh. Nothing comes remotely close to classics like FO1/FO2, et al. On the 3D front at least there was Witcher 3 and FO4/Skyrim to some extent. Mass Effect, et al. are all sorta of bleh too.

I want them to be as good, but they just aren't.

They are good. They just don't emphasize what you prefer in a RPG.

Your references to FO1/FO2/NWN/FO4/Skyrim/Witcher 3 all seem to indicate that freedom [to explore/create] and open worlds and action combat are [most] important to you. They also indicate that quality scripted encounters, storytelling, party mechanics and writing aren't as important to you. The games you refer to as "meh bleh" emphasize the latter and don't do [much of] the former.

Fallout 4 is rated significantly lower [on Steam] than any other game you've mentioned, including ALL of those cRPGs. Fallout 4 is, in fact, the only truly divisive game you've mentioned. To the extent that it was actually rated "Mixed" on Steam for a long time after release.

Also, Mass Effect is more of a shooter with RPG elements.

Cutter wrote on Jan 27, 2017, 00:13:
Edit: Oh yeah, fuck real-time combat with pause already ... I guess what I'd really like to see atm is a new NWN style game.

This makes no sense.
NWN is practically synonymous with [uninvolved] real-time combat with pause. It's Diablo with a [barely relevant] party and a pause button.
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > Splash Damage (and Digital Extremes) Sales
9. Re: Splash Damage (and Digital Extremes) Sales Jul 9, 2016, 16:39 Droniac
To all the people talking about Enemy Territory and its missing sequels:

Quake Wars was the sequel to Enemy Territory. No one bought or played it, because the original was free and more popular, not to mention superior. How exactly do you expect them to make a sequel to a free game and charge money for it without it failing? Obviously it doesn't work, because it didn't. Don't forget that Enemy Territory was originally just a failed expansion pack to Return to Castle Wolfenstein that was never released. The only reason they released the multiplayer for free as a stand-alone game was "why not?" because it was already finished.

They could release a 'free-to-play' version of ET now, but then that's exactly what Splash Damage has done. Dirty Bomb is essentially ET with a different setting and some modernization. It even plays better than their previous attempts (Quake Wars / Brink), albeit not quite on-par with Enemy Territory, which itself was never quite on-par with Return to Castle Wolfenstein.
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > OUTCAST - Second Contact Announced
16. Re: OUTCAST - Second Contact Announced May 30, 2016, 15:21 Droniac
Tachikoma wrote on May 30, 2016, 10:47:
Failed Kicksatrter? Didn`t that HD remake materialize after all? I thought it`s for sale on GOG or some such...

Nah, that was just a 1.1 patch with bug fixes & high-res/controller support. Nice, but no remake.
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > OUTCAST - Second Contact Announced
4. Re: OUTCAST - Second Contact Announced May 30, 2016, 02:25 Droniac
Cutter wrote on May 29, 2016, 21:02:
Enh, I sorta kinda remember this one. Cult classic? That's stretching it a lot methinks.

Outcast released to great review scores. It has a fairly sizable cult following: it was one of the most requested games on GoG. It's consistently regarded as one of the better games ever made (e.g.: PC Gamer Top 100, every year). I don't see any stretching here? A cult classic is exactly what Outcast is.
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > Op Ed
34. Re: Op Ed Apr 18, 2016, 02:50 Droniac
You guys realize that arguing the point, especially to him, isn't going to accomplish anything right? He's clearly not sane. His entire rant screams of Narcissistic Personality Disorder.  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > On Gratuitous Space Battles 2 Support
6. Re: On Gratuitous Space Battles 2 Support Nov 25, 2015, 12:22 Droniac
Eirikrautha wrote on Nov 25, 2015, 11:14:
The reason to keep working on it has to do with reputation. If I know you are going to release a game and support it, I'm likely to buy based on what the game could be rather than what it is at launch. But if I know you are going to drop support for your games quickly, especially if they don't sell well (which happens most frequently with buggy games), then I'm not buying anything that isn't pristine at launch. So you are not supporting for the money you make off this game, but the money you hope to make on the next game.

And this entitled twat has pretty much guaranteed that many people won't bother with his next game at all. Because he can't be trusted to support his flops along with his successes, and we're not willing to take that chance. He's so the poster-child for the spoiled, entitled generations that live now, unwilling to defer gratification for future rewards...


GSB2 has been out for many months. It's seen dozens of updates, including the release of brand new features and significant overhauls free of charge.

Most highly profitable games that have season passes planned out get less support than this sort-of-flop did. So I have no idea what you're whining about exactly, but it's certainly not this game, or cliffski.
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > Sid Meier's Civilization: Beyond Earth Free Weekend
8. Re: Sid Meier's Civilization: Beyond Earth Free Weekend Jan 16, 2015, 08:58 Droniac
eRe4s3r wrote on Jan 16, 2015, 01:25:
What makes you think this game will get expansions?

Since release it had 1 patch, and that patch didn't add any features nor fix any of the major complaints. The game is still what its 54% rating on Steam suggests. A massive fail

A massive fail would imply a game released in an unplayable state, like Rome 2 or Sword of the Stars 2.
A fail would imply a game released in a bad - barely playable - state, like Civilization 5.

Beyond Earth is absolutely playable and even reasonably balanced since the patch you mentioned. It isn't riddled with bugs like all of the aforementioned games, so a constant barrage of patches isn't needed. Indeed by any reasonable measure Beyond Earth is merely a disappointingly mediocre game.

So why exactly would Firaxis not release any expansions for it? When comparing it to its predecessor, Beyond Earth only requires some tweaking to make it as good a game. That and a healthy dose of atmosphere.
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > Guild Wars 2 Free Trial This Week
6. Re: Guild Wars 2 Free Trial This Week Sep 24, 2014, 08:56 Droniac
Jonjonz wrote on Sep 24, 2014, 07:33:
If you like console platform jumping games mashed together with free for all open world follow the mob to the next timed event, hurry on down! If your new to MMO's try WOW's free to level 20 trail, if you want the real deal.

Or if you'd like active combat, an actual story, decently written lore that you don't need to read 30+ books to even remotely comprehend, decent graphics, frequent updates, plenty of new content, no sub fee, no server down times, rewards rather than punishment for helping out other players, no killstealing, no corpsecamping, no constant competitive tag/DPS-the-mob PvE but free cooperative PvE, solid rewards for pretty much any playstyle (PvP/dungeons/WvW/PvE/even jumping puzzles), large-scale PvP / PvE, fully unified servers that let you play with anyone at any time, a world that rewards you for exploring it, and a game that doesn't require you to enjoy the braindead grindfest that is 'end-game raiding' in order to get anything at all out of it because everything else is neglected garbage - then you might want to try GW2 instead of WoW.

As to jamiedj99's notion that this would be because the game is faring badly. How about you take a look at those quarterly earning reports NCSoft publishes? In an extremely weak quarter for GW2 with no major updates and no gem store promotions, it nearly beat Wildstar's launch month. Since then player activity has seen a huge uptick with living world season 2, the recent feature pack, the new WvW season, PvP tournaments, as well as numerous gem store promotions. Also that China launch kinda brought in millions of new players.

The reason for this trial is simple: they just adjusted the new player experience and improved the leveling system. This is the ideal time for them to promote the game and they'd be stupid not to take advantage of it.

The stripped down mechanics were probably needed to start to get new players understanding the game on their own terms. Prior to the feature pack a vast majority of new players needed constant guidance to understand even the most basic mechanics. But it totally screws up the experience for any current player. Making an alt feels like shooting yourself in both feet for the first 20-ish levels. It's awful.

And it doesn't help that they crippled the game's performance with these auto-spawning miniatures. You'd think they'd at least add an option to cull miniatures before launching this trial, but no. So now any large-scale fight (world bosses, world vs world) or city sees the framerate tank to 1/3rd or 1/4th of what it used to be unless you set player visibility to VERY LOW. That's not exactly the experience I'd try to sell GW2 on...

That doesn't change the fact that most of the feature pack was actually pretty good though. The leveling rewards are great, the new low-level super items are kinda cool, the new trading post is way better, collections are nice, crafting backpacks was long overdue, megaserver guilds were long overdue, etc. I wouldn't say it's a bad patch overall, but there are some major changes in it that aren't a net positive for most existing players.
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > Unreal Tournament Pre-Alpha
20. Re: Unreal Tournament Pre-Alpha Sep 11, 2014, 15:42 Droniac
Beamer wrote on Aug 20, 2014, 10:52:
Droniac wrote on Aug 20, 2014, 10:14:
Reckless wrote on Aug 19, 2014, 19:04:
UT is from a bygone era and should be left as such.

Ah yes, the bygone era of competently executed shooters. Much better to stay mired in today's muck of total inferiority.

Bring on Call of Destiny: Serious Slaughterfield ManFace Ultimate Rip-off Edition I say! + season pass plz.

Ah, here's a guy completely overlooking that, back in the UT days, there was probably 4 or 6 shooters coming out every single month. And he's forgotten them because they weren't competent.

Meanwhile, he ignores all the shooters today that are actually pretty damn good and infinitely more complex than anything back then and focuses on the franchise he dislikes.

Great arguments there: assumption + assumption == I must be wrong! Boy, you sure showed me!
Next time do some research before replying - and come with arguments backed by fact, not assumption.

Now here's why you don't base comments on assumptions you just pulled from your ass: you tend to get things wrong. I did bother to do some research, by grabbing a few of my gaming magazines from 1999 and doing some Googling. Thus I've arrived at a complete list of shooters released from September 1999 to November 1999. And since you don't know the significance of those dates: that would be the month of UT's demo to the month of UT's release, thus "the UT days". Here's the list: Descent 3, Expendable, GTA 2, Half Life: Opposing Force, Kingpin, MechWarrior 3, Medal of Honor, Omikron: The Nomad Soul, System Shock 2, SWAT 3, Unreal: Return to Na Pali, Unreal Tournament, and X: Beyond the Frontier.

There are 2 merely decent games among them: Expendable and Unreal: Return to Na Pali. The remaining 11 games are all outright classics. Revered and played to this day by a great many gamers (thanks to GOG, mostly). There are exactly zero incompetent trash releases in there.

Now let's look at this year thus far in PC shooters. That list would be: Rekoil, Loadout, Thief, Resident Evil 4 HD, Titanfall, Deus Ex: The Fall, Luftrausers, Tom Clancy Ghost Recon Phantoms, Wolfenstein: The New Order, Watch Dogs, Transformers: Rise of the Dark Spark, Sniper Elite 3, FireFall, Metro 2033 redux, Metro: Last Light redux, and Dead Rising 3.

Not a single potential classic to be found. The best games in that list are remakes (albeit of some arguable classics). And the only other good games are a small indie game (Luftrausers) and a very well-polished, but extremely simplistic and restrictive scripted shooter (Wolfenstein: The New Order). The rest is mostly trash or on the lower scale of decent.

I'm not saying there are zero good shooters nowadays, but they're extremely rare. And even then they're usually not quite the outright classics that those older games tended to be, even when you compare them side-by-side today. Which is easy to do, mainly thanks to GOG. Deus Ex and System Shock 2 are more mechanically rich than their modern successors Deus Ex: Human Revolution and BioShock Infinite, for example.

Indeed many of the good shooters today, of which there are few, tend to be seen as good for something other than their actual shooter elements. Planetside 2 for its online elements, BioShock Infinite/Deus Ex: Human Revolution for their character progression/story, Borderlands 1/2 for their emphasis on loot and levels. The latter of those are even infamous for their outright awful gunplay.

As to your 'complexity' cop out: you can't just throw something like that in there and expect anyone to understand what you mean. What are you referring to when you say modern games are 'infinitely more complex' than anything from the UT era? Do you mean in terms of environmental detail and character detail? Sure. Absolutely. Games back then didn't look anything like modern games. Conversely they had A LOT more room to experiment with new and different game mechanics. Which is why games of that era tend to be a lot more complex when it comes to the actual gameplay.

Lastly, my sentence comprised of 4 games, not one franchise. Since you can't seem to find them I'll spell them out for you: Call of Duty, Destiny, Battlefield, and Warface. I've played most shooters released since Wolfenstein 3D. The quality for a vast majority of shooter releases today is abysmal compared to what it used to be. And the offerings are VERY uniform, with very nearly every shooter (including the good ones) featuring the exact same gunplay: machineguns + pistols + snipers and nothing innovative or fast-paced, ever. Not to mention the universal horizontal maps, excessive scripting, completely linear level design, etc. There are a few tiny exceptions, but they're barely a drop in the ocean.
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > Star Trek: Alien Domain Announced
6. Re: Star Trek: Alien Domain Announced Sep 11, 2014, 11:37 Droniac
Yeah that sounds awful. It'll probably be cancelled just like the last Star Trek browser MMO.

There have been some good Star Trek games though. Armada, Starfleet Command, Elite Force... even Star Trek Online is pretty good nowadays.
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > Unreal Tournament Pre-Alpha
13. Re: Unreal Tournament Pre-Alpha Aug 20, 2014, 10:14 Droniac
Reckless wrote on Aug 19, 2014, 19:04:
UT is from a bygone era and should be left as such.

Ah yes, the bygone era of competently executed shooters. Much better to stay mired in today's muck of total inferiority.

Bring on Call of Destiny: Serious Slaughterfield ManFace Ultimate Rip-off Edition I say! + season pass plz.
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > CD Projekt RED Roadmap
26. Re: CD Projekt RED Roadmap Mar 22, 2013, 07:50 Droniac
Slick wrote on Mar 22, 2013, 02:00:
you can't be seriously trying to debate me on this? can you???

name me one PC gamer who's never heard of torrentz, let alone doesn't pirate most of their games. now name me one Console gamer that even understands how it would be possible to pirate a game for the PS3...

logic much? i don't have to listen to wtf a publisher says, i know from my own eyes and ears that %90 of the PC gamers i know pirate their stuff, while i know of exactly 1 console gamer who has a modded xbox 360.

lol, i guess i'm just a shill for the publishing companies though right? and unable to make my own conclusions with my own judgement from my own personal experience...


There are tens of millions of PC gamers who have never heard of torrents. Many people play Facebook games, web games, solitaire, The Sims, MMOs, etc.

Also, while this should have been covered in elementary school, you should know that your "logic" is based on the most stupid kind of fallacious reasoning. You're taking your own, small, marginal, experience to be the reality for the entire industry.

Face reality kid: your personal experience is not even a blip of a blip of a blip of a blip of a blip of a blip of a blip on the radar of the piracy situation for the games industry. And that's not exclusive to you: it's true for every individual, including myself. My, entirely opposite to your, personal experience is equally invalid when it comes to describing the full picture.

The knowledge that personal experience counts for absolutely nothing in arguments like these is such a basic fact of reasoning that to have you shouting "LOGIC" is the most hilarious thing I've seen in quite a while. It's almost as bad as the CoD kiddies whining at (a completely correct) TotalBiscuit on Twitter yesterday, proclaiming their "godlike intelligence" and then proceeding to not understand that their saying "you're entitled to head-butt a knife" actually qualifies as a death-threat.
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > Ad Says Guild Wars 2 Next Month
23. Re: Ad Says Guild Wars 2 Next Month May 16, 2012, 03:55 Droniac
PropheT wrote on May 16, 2012, 00:44:
The magic release day patch, ah yes. It's a mythical creature commonly mentioned on message boards leading up to the release date of a game that's clearly not done yet. "Don't you realize we're just testing an outdated version?!?" is my personal favorite version of this.

In general I'd agree with this. With ArenaNet, I'm not so sure. They're the one company I can recall who did implement a miracle patch between final beta weekend event and release for the original Guild Wars. Granted, some of the chances weren't positive (skill purchases for PvP), but they changed A LOT and had way more content than could've been expected based on the public beta weekends.

That being said, Guild Wars didn't really even need a miracle patch in the first place. Even the original open alpha event was very playable and solid. Guild Wars 2 on the other hand clearly still needs a fair bit of work, particularly in terms of performance. I'd be surprised if they release it in June. August or September would seem more likely as earliest estimates.

It's also important to note that ArenaNet started Guild Wars beta weekend events some 7-8 months prior to the game's eventual release. Guild Wars 2 only had its first beta weekend a couple of weeks ago. So if their Guild Wars development process is anything to go by, then we've certainly still got some waiting to do.
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > Sword of the Stars II Launch Issues
24. Re: Sword of the Stars II Launch Issues Oct 31, 2011, 18:37 Droniac
They released a massive patch today that fixed the most critical issues. The game now starts properly in 64-bit Windows and the most common crashes have been eliminated. I just played 3 hours straight without a single crash.

They still NEED to fix the sluggish interface, the inaccessible options menu, the sound cutting out randomly, and the lack of tooltips (which has now been partially remedied) but otherwise it's playable and almost enjoyable. The sluggish interface makes things unbearably slow, but there seems to be a good game here.
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > Might & Magic Heroes VI Beta This Month
12. Re: Might & Magic Heroes VI Beta This Month Jun 3, 2011, 05:47 Droniac
It's a given that M&M:H VI will not have always-online DRM. As far as I know UbiSoft has now dropped that system completely and the last game to use it was Prince of Persia: The Forgotten Sands.

The DRM employed in their most recent PC games:
R.U.S.E. - Steamworks DRM
Assassin's Creed: Brotherhood - 1 time online activation on install

So it's likely to be one of those two systems.
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
23 Comments. 2 pages. Viewing page 1.
< Newer [ 1 2 ] Older >

Blue's News is a participant in Amazon Associates programs
and earns advertising fees by linking to Amazon.


Blue's News logo