The Half Elf wrote on Nov 1, 2016, 12:33:
Leave the Diablo franchise alone (or at least take it in a new direction). Just think it's too soon for them to push out another Diablo game unless they really come at it hard with new ideas, otherwise your going to end up with a Call of Duty situation where they pump out a new one every year.

Kxmode wrote on Oct 31, 2016, 21:19:

RedEye9 wrote on Oct 31, 2016, 19:46:

Kxmode wrote on Oct 31, 2016, 18:46:
Never implied they broke their game. I simply said not including support for mods from the original Skyrim is a mistake. :)

Mods are not the responsibility of Bethesda. If they get broke, it's up to the mod maker to fix his or her mod.

As someone who made a WOW addon, I found your statement to be half true. Absolutely, it is incumbent upon mod authors to keep their mods updated. However, it's also up to the developers not to radically change their engine. Blizzard at least keeps addon devs in the loop via the PTR, and alpha and beta servers for upcoming expansions. AFAIK Beth didn't do this for mod devs.

The Half Elf wrote on Oct 31, 2016, 16:59:
I meant the Special Edition. Skyrim with mods STILL looks better then the SE out of the box. I thought they might throw in some better draw distances etc, but nope.

ItBurn wrote on Oct 31, 2016, 11:47:
I've played this for a couple of hours. Absolutely no reason to get this on PC other than if you never played the game. The game barely looks better, it's hard to tell. Graphic mods will make it look much better. If you're missing DLCs, just get the individual DLCs. Also, as far as I can tell, you seem forced to use the in-game mod browser to get your mods, and it sucks. I mean, it works, but it's the worst interface of all time, which is normal coming from Beth. Also, some mods are absent, like the vital SkyUI. Not sure if it's because the mods from the ingame interface are limited(no extended scripting). Maybe you can still mod manually, I don't know... On consoles though, this version is a major upgrade in every way.

CrimsonPaw wrote on Oct 28, 2016, 10:39:
Love me some Skyrim, but I refuse to pay $60 for a 5 year old game. I'll grab this when it's $40. Looking forward to playing Titanfall 2 later on today though!

Jerykk wrote on Oct 28, 2016, 12:22:
The only reason EA wouldn't do a season pass is if they weren't very confident in the game's sales.

nin wrote on Oct 26, 2016, 09:08:

Wallshadows wrote on Oct 26, 2016, 09:02:
I am sure they are absolutely devastated by this.

So I thought the whole reason they left Valve was to have their own IP? Did they sell Evolve to 2k? Or did 2K own it to begin with?

RedEye9 wrote on Oct 25, 2016, 21:12:
"big media" reviews will mean even less now, youtube and twitch to the rescue.

nin wrote on Oct 25, 2016, 21:19:
Looks wonderful, from what I've seen. Hope performance doesn't suffer...

jdreyer wrote on Oct 25, 2016, 14:26:
If you think Trump will stack the court with consumer-friendly justices either candidate will do anything in favor of the average citizen, I have a bridge to sell you.

jdreyer wrote on Oct 22, 2016, 21:48:

PHJF wrote on Oct 22, 2016, 16:56:

jdreyer wrote on Oct 22, 2016, 14:45:

PHJF wrote on Oct 22, 2016, 14:18:

Rule 34 for Overwatch in full effect.

Blizzard knew EXACTLY what they were doing when they designed their female characters.

Really?

Those two characters were designed specifically in response to women complaining about the sexualization of existing characters.

So these were the last characters added to Overwatch last? Links?

Tipsy McStagger wrote on Oct 21, 2016, 13:17:
How's the religion spam in this?

It was horrible in the last one.