User information for Annex
Real Name
Annex
Nickname
Annex
Email
Concealed by request
Description
Homepage
None given.
Supporter
–
Signed On
August 21, 2010
Total Posts
49 (Suspect)
User ID
55899
YES!!!!!!
Great game, im loving it so far. I adore games with humor, ANY HUMOR, and this so far is a great start. Dont recall the last time a game made me laugh out loud
Paul and Fred can go to hell. If it wasnt for Stardock we still wouldnt have a Star Control game, after all these decades. Ghosts of the Precursors isnt a game, its just a paper launched idea, whereas Star Control Origins is a few months away from retail launch.
mellis wrote on Feb 24, 2018, 14:40:
Hope Stardock wins this
Agreed. Paul and Fred had twenty years to make more SC games, but they couldnt have been bothered. All of a sudden they care? Fukem.
Got this long ago during early access, but havent played yet. I like supporting devs for games like this so they make more of em, as every now and then we get a gem like Stellaris.
Yeah the screenshots look like a shitty console game. Hopefully its a lot of alpha placeholder art/design
I love top down. SPAZ is a brilliant game, hopefully SPAZ 2 will be even better, so having more games in this style is fantastic.
Since (good) games like this are incredibly rare, im more than happy paying $50 so the devs stay in business and make more. I played the crap out of the first game + DLCs so bring on the sequel!
Preordered. Going to lose many hours in this game
I backed this on the first day, looks fantastic. I love kickstarter projects that already have some gameplay footage to show off their idea rather than just a few sketches on a piece of paper.
eRe4s3r wrote on Oct 15, 2013, 14:03:
Birds are singing of hexes instead of grid.. this makes this an automatic buy..
Official website confirms it will have hexes
Spent 188 hours on the first game. Brilliant game and im thrilled its getting a sequel!!
I am so excited to see this game finally coming! Woohoo!
Glad theyre redoing the weapon systems. The original implementation really sucked.
No single player = deal breaker, just like mechwarrior online. Nothing more than FPS shooters with mechs
Saboth wrote on Apr 25, 2013, 20:26:
Please don't ruin yet another awesome game by putting too much emphasis on multiplayer.
Yeah I totally agree. I would rather see them focus on making super awesome grinder modes that arent complete cakewalks like in the last expansion.
Ive three times now installed this game, played it for many hours, and uninstalled it in disgust. As others have mentioned the game lacks soul. It starts off great but then you realize its a faceless, emotionless, dull game. With only 3 weapon types and combat being essentially controlled by the AI, and the devs focusing on everything BUT the games weaknesses, I have lost hope. Beautiful looking game with a fantastic interface, but the devs either cant or dont want to address the games biggest shortcomings that have been pointed out since day 1.
RollinThundr wrote on Feb 14, 2013, 14:48:Yakubs wrote on Feb 14, 2013, 14:40:RollinThundr wrote on Feb 14, 2013, 13:41:
Again how are they getting all this revenue to buy up devs? Aside from World of Tanks and World of Warplanes I have never heard of any of the titles they've published.
You're making the assumption that GPG is actually worth something. Remember, this is a company that was desperate for some kind of cash infusion as recently as last week. As it stands, the only value GPG has is its IP which is offset by its payroll liabilities.
Meanwhile, Wargaming is probably fairly cash rich on an ongoing basis and running at a fairly high margin considering their revenue comes from a F2P title. Ongoing high margin revenue means the ability to easily add staff.
Wargaming probably bought GPG for a pittance and simply agreed to employ them (or at least some of them) and support some sort of future project. We're not talking a multi-million-dollar buyout here.
I get that, but GPG isn't their only recent pickup. I guess F2P games are making more money than one would think.
10+ million per month is what theyre making.
World of Tanks brings in 10+ million in revenue per month. More than enough to buy out GPG completely and any other small studio they want.
Cutter wrote on Feb 7, 2013, 09:57:
It looks like WoW for kids. They should have cashed in on this years ago. Way too late now.
Now if only looks defined if a game was good or bad...
Copyright © 1996-2025 Stephen Heaslip. All rights reserved.
All trademarks are properties of their respective owners.
Privacy Policy. Manage Cookie Settings.
News CGI copyright © 1999-2025 James "furn" Furness & Blue's News. All rights reserved.
Chatbear v1.5.0/blue++: Page generated 6 December 2025, 15:59.