Sphinx wrote on Oct 1, 2011, 18:31:
I'm disappointed that Sledgehammer studios doesn't make a game based on the 80s cop show "Sledgehammer!"

PHJF wrote on Sep 27, 2011, 18:19:
Unrealistic racing games seem to be on the outs. Hot Pursuit and Split/Second and Blur were all met with lukewarm reception, and Hot Pursuit shouldn't have been fucking wasting the Burnout devs' time like it did.

ASeven wrote on Sep 23, 2011, 12:05:

EddieTheHack wrote on Sep 23, 2011, 11:53:
...worthless drivel...

Here let me rephrase all the drivel you wrote:

STOP LIKING WHAT I DON'T LIKE DAMMIT!

Rather fun that the butthurt trolls that don't like the game label anyone who actually enjoys it as a fantard.

Teddy wrote on Sep 20, 2011, 23:37:

Razumen wrote on Sep 20, 2011, 22:47:

{PH}88fingers wrote on Sep 20, 2011, 21:29:
What if diablo 3 was labeled a multiplayer game... with the ability to play solo if you wish... would that make it ok to buy the game?

If the game is fun and you have an internet connection, what's the problem.

The problem is that Blizzard is using that requirement to squash any chance for user made mods, (even in SP) most likely for the sake of more profitable future DLC. That, and requiring being online for the singleplayer game is a ridiculous requirement, regardless of the majority of people's internet connectivity.

That's a pretty hefty statement considering Blizzard has never to my knowledge done DLC in it's entire history of games. Nor have they allowed mods, save for new maps in the *craft games.

Creston wrote on Sep 20, 2011, 21:48:
Make sure to be amazed at how there is absolutely NO LAG!

Creston

Weapons were different, and there were obviously some weapons that could only be worn by certain classes. However, things were still very flexible. My wizard could wield a 2h sword, or a hatchet/shield combo, or a wand and an orb. There were only a few things like hand wraps for monks, and shivs for demon hunters that were very class specific.

Mashiki Amiketo wrote on Sep 14, 2011, 00:19:
Wow. That's impressive. It asks my 'age' to view the content even though I'm logged into b.net. My brain is broken at the stupidity.

The Half Elf wrote on Sep 10, 2011, 21:32:

Dirwulf wrote on Sep 10, 2011, 20:31:

necrosis wrote on Sep 10, 2011, 19:11:

PHJF wrote on Sep 10, 2011, 18:00:
L
As for those talking about the VAC ban issues welcome to the future of gaming. If you want more examples: http://www.wired.com/gamelife/2010/10/starcraft-ban/

You mean the guy who used a trainer ONLINE in MULTIPLAYER and got banned? Because he wanted to hack achievements? Really? You're using THAT as an example?

You mean the guy who used a trainer for single player and didn't turn it off when he went to multiplayer (or kept activating it) because he was playing skirmish matches against the AI and not using it for achievements?

I mean don't let facts get in the way or anything, especially when you link to the article and don't even bother reading it.

necrosis wrote on Sep 10, 2011, 19:11:

PHJF wrote on Sep 10, 2011, 18:00:
L
As for those talking about the VAC ban issues welcome to the future of gaming. If you want more examples: http://www.wired.com/gamelife/2010/10/starcraft-ban/