jdreyer wrote on Aug 1, 2017, 02:39:

The Half Elf wrote on Jul 31, 2017, 22:24:
Anyone remember when this was suppose to be a Wing Commander game, and not the second coming of Second Life?

You will NOT deny Slimram of his dream of being a space janitor!

Mr. Tact wrote on Aug 1, 2017, 00:09:

Gibbage wrote on Aug 1, 2017, 00:07:
Wake me up with they file for bankruptcy and everyone is stuck with a 30 million dollar tech demo.

Aren't we $100+ million now?

Mouser wrote on Jul 26, 2017, 22:05:
I really hate to say it as well, but I think this game is going to be DOA when it launches after seeing the numbers they had for the open beta.
http://www.githyp.com/lawbreakers-could-flop-based-on-player-counts-from-the-steam-beta/

Ludomancer wrote on Jun 26, 2017, 10:46:
Not that any other piece of software is different now a days, but I'd like to see people outline these contents more openly, so --

6. PRIVACY; CONSENT TO ACCESS YOUR COMPUTER
Full information regarding how we collect, use and share information about you or your computer is at: http://www.funcom.com/corporate/privacy_policy . Acceptance of our privacy policy is incorporated into this agreement.
While the Software is installed on your computer, you authorize us to access, modify or delete Game-related data on your computer via the Software and Service. Also, you authorize us to check your version of the Software and automatically download and install Software upgrades to update, patch, fix, enhance and further develop the Software and Service. Some upgrades may be designed to disable unauthorized access to the Software or delete unauthorized copies of the Software. You will not bypass any automatic update downloads or installations.
In addition, you authorize us to monitor or collect certain information from your computer or our servers related to the use or performance of the Game, including to record your gameplay and interactions with other players in the Game.
Data entered into the game to create accounts, make use of purchased items, utilize the game, or communicate with other users may be stored on servers located in the U.S and Europe. Each data hosting provider’s role is limited to providing a hosting and storage service to Funcom Oslo AS and the providers are not permitted to access or use your information, except for the limited purpose of storing the information. 
The Game may contain links to other third-party websites. Such websites are not controlled by Us, and we are not responsible for and do not endorse their content, privacy policies or data security practices. You should make your own informed judgement regarding your interaction with such third-party websites, including the purchase and use of any products or services accessible through them.

What information does Funcom collect?

Personal Information: Funcom collects information you voluntarily provide during the registration process in order to grant you access to products and service provided by Funcom and its affiliates. This "Personal Information" may include your name, your address, your email, and payment details such as credit card information. Funcom uses this information to collect payments and to provide access to our products and services.

Computer Information: Funcom may collect and store your internet protocol address. As noted in individual game's End User License Agreements and/or Terms of Service. We may use this information to remotely check your computer to determine if any “Restricted Software” (as such term is defined in the EULA) is installed or if any necessary software patches supplied by Funcom have been installed.

Chat Room Information: Funcom may monitor any Chat room on the Funcom website(s) for the purpose of determining whether a violation of the Chat room guidelines has occurred and to take appropriate action as we deem reasonably necessary. Funcom encourages you not to use your real name or disclose personal information in a Chat room – once posted any personal information will no longer be private.

Non-personal Information: Funcom may from time to time collect information such as number of players on-line for a particular time period, number of players by country, and average session length on an aggregated basis. This non-personal information does not specifically identify you or any other single user.

CJ_Parker wrote on May 23, 2017, 14:40:

Quinn wrote on May 23, 2017, 11:30:
Let's face it. Episodic HITMAN was a stupid as fuck choice. Many people are like me and don't just play games because LOLZ FUN GAMEPLAY, and actually want a substantial experience; a good, moving story.

The last game was a motherfucking arcade game. "Here's your target and these are the possible ways to take them out. Find out how and be the ultimate assassin :D".

Fuck off.

^ this

They can shove their episodic MMO crap up their collective bungholes. It's good to see that the studio is reaping the devastating rewards of their stupidity. Good riddance.
And best wishes to everyone losing their job. May y'all find a new employer that isn't headed by a bunch of retarded amoeba.

VaranDragon wrote on May 5, 2017, 11:40:
I wish I had the money, and the time to check out these releases. I skipped Dishonored 2. It just seemed more of the same. This looks much more interesting TBH, however Real Life gets in the way.

I don't know how you people manage to do it. The older I get, the less time I have to devote to gaming. I still do game, but I find that I'm concentrating my gaming time on just one "game" at a time.

thecakeisalie wrote on May 6, 2017, 11:35:
3 years in Alpha, how long in Beta? We might see a "release" in 2020 at this rate, at which time this game will look like an SNES game compared to what will probably be cutting edge by then.

Sacrifice wrote on May 1, 2017, 11:05:
It looks almost identical to Grimrock. I like dungeon crawlers and will keep an eye on this. Hopefully it isn't just a rip-off.

Blackhawk wrote on Mar 2, 2017, 11:50:
I haven't played enough NMS to really talk about how innovative the ideas were, but I will say this: Innovation doesn't mean fun, or polished, and it can fail to live up to promises. An awful game can have great new ideas.

Genesys wrote on Feb 5, 2017, 12:47:
Heh. Is this the first time a company has killed their official servers in favor of user-hosted servers? Usually it's the other way around :)

Slick wrote on Jan 14, 2017, 23:31:
Anyone remember THIS MTG game from the '90s?

That was 20 years ago. 20 years of sitting on their asses and never taking a real stab at what could have been with digitizing this game. Never a second thought given to a true MTG online experience. And no, half-assed poorly executed attempts don't count. The best MTG games were the Duels of the Planeswalkers series, except you could only fuck with pre-made decks with a fraction of the total cards in the universe. Not to mention they were more focused on a "call of duty" strategy where they can re-sell the same product every year, instead of building THE definitive online experience with all the collecting and dueling in one place like Hearthstone.

20 fucking years.

I'm honestly amazed that it took Blizzard so long to beat them at their own game, or that no one else did earlier. Mojang's "Scrolls" was a better game IMO than either Hearthstone or MTG, but Microsoft killed that. Paid +$2 Billion for 2 games, decided to focus on one, and just ignore the other. "New game from the creator of Minecraft!" - advertisement no one ever produced.

"We have investors that have agreed to contribute the balance we need to complete this game as long as we can validate that there is a demand for a high end PC space game. By meeting or surpassing our target on Kickstarter you tell the world that you want a PC based Space Sim and allow us to make this game."

"Switching engines during development worked for me!"- George Broussard

The community has had an enormous impact shaping the game and it's always interesting watching the weekly videos and being able to meet the developers at events.

Cutter wrote on Dec 17, 2016, 13:49:

Total-Khaos wrote on Dec 17, 2016, 13:31:

"We only ever refer to our Anti-Tamper solution as being ‘hard to crack’, never ‘uncrackable,’" Goebl told Gamasutra in response to a question of whether or not game piracy could ever really be stopped.

The word "solution" implies you've solved the piracy problem with your software entirely...which you have not. All your software does is make it harder for legitimate consumers to use someone else's product they paid for.

Anti-tamper solution vs. Piracy solution = two very different things.

"We only ever refer to our Anti-Tamper solution as being ‘hard to crack’, never ‘uncrackable,’" Goebl told Gamasutra in response to a question of whether or not game piracy could ever really be stopped.

RECOMMENDED:
Additional Notes: System requirements to be announced soon.