This industry is so damn cringey.

Shades of Netflix! *ferocious wrist snap*

Also...'A Ubisoft Original'? English isn't my first language, but shouldn't it be An Ubisoft Original?

Really doesn't matter to me, the last Ubisoft published title I played was...*checks notes*....Far Cry 3...from December of 2012 LOL.

Looks like we found the newest Google+'esque failure from our annoying pals over at Gewgle.

The company responsible for operating the flaming cesspit called YouTube is going to somehow solve the infrastructure limitations that make this virtually inaccessible to a massive percentage of users while branding it as something that 'enables gaming for everyone'? Wow sounds like a recipe for disaster and straight PR/Marketing horseshit.

This thing can die in a fire, as quickly as possible please.

PS. The controller looks like ass and looks like it was designed by committee in a boardroom 'hey guize, let's just merge the Xbawks and Paystation controllers!' *do not pass go, do collect 6 figure salary*.

What a wonderful industry /s

I think this is one of the few things that we can ALL agree on here.

Fuck cheaters.

I really hope this is the start of a trend with strict hardware bans from more developers so these low-life losers can go and cry to mommy for more money for a new PC (hopefully mommy will tell them to pound sand).

Good riddance to toxic assholes.

This cracked $500k last night around supper time EST...it's already almost at a million ~12 hours later after launching just a few days ago? This kickstarter is something else...

This game is a little rough around the edges, but I still play it on occasion and if there are decent servers, it's a fun game for sure.

What I like about it (aside from kickass bolt-action rifles) are the small little gameplay things they got right. The cover system, the leaning, the being able to run while you're crouched, being able to rest your weapon along a window ledge to stabilize it. Not to mention I actually like the netcode in RO2, you shoot a guy and it feels like a solid kill everytime.

The game runs a little sluggish at times and doesn't have the polish of a AAA title, but if you like FPS shooters, check this one out, you might be surprised.

PS. I have not played this newly patched version...my opinions are based on older builds of the game. I'll try to post an update after playing the new version for a bit

Enkur wrote on Apr 22, 2012, 11:42:
I am not sure why people are comlaining so much. They have been releasing a steady stream of patches.

You mean a steady stream of liquid shit that took 6 months to properly patch post-launch? They've released a handful of shitty small patches, and one useless large one, I hardly call that a steady stream of patches.

Jackplug wrote on Apr 22, 2012, 04:28:
Its just a hacked to hell game with no gameplay with failed mass destruction.

It's sad that 'destruction' was a huge selling point in this game and yet it's easily worse than destruction from Bad Company 2. There are pre-canned destruction sequences that kill people randomly...and then there are multiple parts of a building that are indestructible.

At least BF3 helped finalize DICE's death, doubt too many original Battlefield fans will ever buy a DICE product again.

You mean they claim to have fixed things that were claimed to have been fixed in that last large (1.6 GB) client patch? DICE can't even keep up with their own change logs since half of the things they claimed to have previously fixed are still issues in the game.

They should just worry about making the netcode as tight as possible instead of stupid unwanted expansion packs or stupid shit tweaks to guns that don't need them. Unfortunately this won't happen and the netcode will still be garbage by the time the Closet Combat DLC drops.

/not mad

StealthR6 wrote on Apr 3, 2012, 21:21:
When did Ubi release the last good Tom Clancy game? Answer: 2003

QFT, discussion over.

A 3rd person 'shooter' with DRM and stupid uplay bloatwear? Get the fuck outta here ubisoft.

Gotta say, not buying EA and Ubisoft games is nice...feels good man.

InBlack wrote on Mar 23, 2012, 11:34:
Give me Red Dead Redemption for the PC or fuckoff.

QFMFT

I was all excited about some new Sim City news until I remembered that EA is involved

Excitement destroyed, EA wins again.

It's looking like the character models, prologues, and endings for most of the characters presumed to be DLC (including Elena, Guy, Alisa, Mega Man, Pac-Man and other fan favorites) for the Xbox 360 version of the game are actually on disc.

Dear Capcom, go fuck yourself

DICE has shown that they've become one of the worst developers in terms of communication with community, it's become pathetic but not something we should be surprised by.

We were supposed to hear about a new DLC last week, nothing. We were told a real patch would be dropping in February, still nothing or no news. Battlefield 3, as much of a technical marvel that it is, is EASILY the most disappointing game in the series, much much more so than Bad Company games.

I'm sure I'm not alone when saying BF3 will be the last DICE game I've purchased. I'm expecting we'll hear an announcement about Battlefield 2143 and how DICE will be working on Medal of Honor 2 long before we hear anything about the new DLC/new content.

Good job destroying your brand and alienating your community DICE, at least you guys are still efficient at something

Battlefield 3 PC VoIP issues 'bahaha like we give a shit about you PC goons' says DICE.

There's a really, really simple way of determining what type of game this new Rainbow 6 is going to be, I'll answer this question with one simple fact.

If the main character(s) run around the game without headgear, while their other teammates wear full headgear, you can bet we're getting another game like Vegas. The 'main' hero is so badass that he doesn't need a helmet or any of that stuff.

Bring back Ding Chavez and the actual tactical nature of Rainbow Six games, not this new-age console bullshit with fast-repelling down the side of a fucking bridge during a colossal rainstorm. Take it down a few notches Michael Bay.

This game will be a major fail.

Don't fix the actual game DICE, no that would make too much sense. Instead add a fucking useless feature that less than 1% of the users will use.

DICE has really shat all over the Battlefield name. BF3 is depressingly unfinished and broken. If you seriously think the netcode is good in this game I suggest a psychiatric evaluation, fucking pathetic.

eRe4s3r wrote on Sep 2, 2011, 14:25:
I see the grumpy BF3 haters are back in town.

Heres an idea, don't like it, don't buy it. The servers are gonna be much more pleasant without grumpy ranters.

Pretty sure everyone is hating on EA and not Battlefield 3, in fact I don't think I've seen anyone specifically hate on BF3 here.

EA on the other hand, it's entirely justified. EA has done virtually everything they could possibly do short of cancelling this game to ruin the hype and excitement leading up to it, but should we expect anything less from EA at this point? Nope!

Get ready for yet another movie-inspired terrible console-port for an overpriced game that will likely play like Delta Force 2, but with a clunky, broken 3rd person camera...

I can't wait!

*Sorry for slandering Delta Force 2, it was just the first ancient game that came to mind.

Thanks to the noobs!

You guys helped me set new life high scores for a bunch of classes.

PS. I love you Valve.

hubricide wrote on Jun 21, 2011, 13:55:
TF2 lost me at hat grinding.

Wait, adding an optional, cosmetic feature is a reason to stop playing a game that's probably the best $10 value you're going to find?

I could see if they nerfed guns or ruined balance, yeah sure.

'Omg they gave my main character a haircut...that was the last straw! '