Creston wrote on Feb 25, 2014, 18:50:
"It's tremendously awkward to tell someone that you should buy two copies of the expansion just to get a second 90
errr... wouldn't that actually be CHEAPER?
1badmf wrote on Dec 24, 2013, 13:24:
and the worst part is i don't think the brits have a bill of rights that they can point to to say that's a clear violation.
Ehm okay have fun then....
Dades wrote on Aug 17, 2012, 10:03:
Maybe if they made an expansion pack that wasn't all about Pandas people wouldn't laugh at them for making an expansion pack all about pandas. Wow guys stop laughing at them for blatantly pandering to the lowest common denominator!! Hmm that requires more thought, lets analyze the predicament here.
InBlack wrote on Aug 17, 2012, 04:12:
How can any 'sane' person of a relatively normal conscience even attempt something like this kind of litigation??? First Bethesda with "Scrolls" and now Rebellion with "Rebellion".
What is wrong with you people!!!????
Blizzard has trouble moving on from that point too apparently, judging by the trailer's focus. Just sayin.
Agent.X7 wrote on Aug 16, 2012, 12:52:
You guys all realize that Pandarens were around long before Kung Fu Panda, right?
Darks wrote on Aug 14, 2012, 15:44:
and pretty well managed to piss off most of their hard core fans. Literally!
Closed Betas wrote on Jul 31, 2012, 18:54:
As for single player games.. SWTOR is a single player game.. lol...
So was Age of Conan, so is just about everything else.
Why its online is anyone's guess.. Until a game removes solo'ing ability from the MP games, they will suffer and the game communities will fail because it gives a reason to be a douche.. If you needed others, you'd think twice about how your acting in game.
Alamar wrote on Jul 25, 2012, 12:54:
So when LK was coming out... Arthas was a big figure... We knew he was the foozle (props to the oldies - CGW FTW)...
When Cata came out, Deathchin made a big presence, and we knew he was the foozle...
Now, sure, admittedly, I haven't followed Mists dev, but... Who the hell is the foozle?
"It plays fast, it's clicky, but the combat's fluid and fun rather than tactical and mind-numbing.
ColoradoHoudini wrote on Jul 11, 2012, 20:11:
One thing I've never mentioned in my tiny rants about TOR.. the length of time it took to run place to place and the amount of backtracking I had to do on my main quest line. The game would make me physically run back from the furthest reaches of a map, to the main area.. then to my homeworld, to the furthest reaches of that place.. to talk to a guy to get 10 seconds worth of audio and then to be sent RIGHT GOD DAMN BACK from where I came.
That sort of stuff infuriates me
Orogogus wrote on Jun 23, 2012, 20:09:
Huh. Why are the charts that way?
Orogogus wrote on Jun 23, 2012, 14:45:
The all-time chart does seem to show a drop from a former steady point at ~30K to ~15K, and Umbragen didn't specify a time period.
Stormsinger wrote on Jun 23, 2012, 01:21:
Eve, a game of the sociopaths, for the sociopaths, and by the sociopaths.
It's a bit sad really, large parts of the game are actually fun. But I have no interest in being required to play the part of a target for someone else's greed. And you have no real choice in Eve...you're either sociopath, or target.
ASeven wrote on Jun 20, 2012, 11:52:
Woah, is that the most brutal cancellation announcement ever? These type of announcements don't usually go into this much detail.
Sambek_Z wrote on Jun 15, 2012, 18:15:
Moral relativism is a logical contradiction. If one is truly a moral relativist, then he should have nothing to say to someone whose morality is based on science, reading tea leaves, or believing in a god. Nor should he boast that he is moral to others or attempt to persuade others of his point of view, because that would be nonsensical. His morality is for his actions alone, how others think or behave should be irrelevant. Therefore, I find hypocrisy and logical self-contradiction in those who say they espouse moral relativism and yet advocate for it.
Rather, these people should realize that they are really moral absolutists who happen to conflict with the views of other moral absolutists.
NicklePop wrote on Jun 15, 2012, 16:35:
By the relativist philosophy dumping the philosophical equivalent of garbage into your mind is the same thing as studying Socrates.
Hahahaha. How do you not see the foolishness of this perspective?
Is everything OK? Should society take-up mass heroin use?
If not, then what is the limit? Or are you saying that the only limit is somewhere beyond the Christians?
wtf_man wrote on Jun 15, 2012, 09:18:Blackhawk wrote on Jun 15, 2012, 09:14:wtf_man wrote on Jun 15, 2012, 09:06:
Tons of content, yes... but those things??? Sorry, I disagree. Wow bored the shit out of me within the first few levels... and I stuck it out through the mid levels.
You only stuck it out through the mid levels, and yet you speak authoritatively about its content and depth?
Yeah... I suppose a couple months of being bored to death isn't enough time to make a judgement, or form an opinion, about a game's content and depth.