User comment history
< Newer [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ] Older >
| News Comments > Supreme Commander 2 DLC Released |
 |
| 7. |
Re: Supreme Commander 2 DLC Released |
Sep 28, 2010, 11:52 |
Sleeeeepy |
|
|
| I'm glad people are enjoying supcom2, just wish I could have too since I have no current active RTS's to play (except the first supcom when I can persuade a buddy to have a game, but having to put up with gpgnet is a pain in the arse) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Civilization V Manual |
|
| 5. |
Re: Civilization V Manual |
Sep 18, 2010, 19:47 |
Sleeeeepy |
|
|
| This rocks. Unlike the horrible flash-beast website. But no one is perfect and releasing this manual was a great idea, and I'm psyched for the game. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Supreme Commander 2 Patched |
|
| 3. |
Re: Supreme Commander 2 Patched |
Sep 16, 2010, 13:33 |
Sleeeeepy |
|
|
Ventura wrote on Sep 16, 2010, 06:35:
Say what you want about the state of this game when it was released, but it has been patched extensively post-release, and that's a big +1 in my book.
True dat. I didn't buy this even when it was ultra-cheap on steam, but it does bode better for their post release support. Let's hope it still counts should GPG decide to go back to non dumbed down games. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > TRON: Evolution Trailer |
|
| 9. |
Re: TRON: Evolution Trailer |
Sep 7, 2010, 17:58 |
Sleeeeepy |
|
|
| Watched it mainly for the Olivia Wilde'y goodness, but the game seems to have a distinctly wipeout vibe in places, which is also good with me. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > DirectDraw Hack |
|
| 5. |
Re: DirectDraw Hack |
Sep 7, 2010, 13:55 |
Sleeeeepy |
|
|
| fair play to these guys for ingenuity but I would just go the lazy route and run them on a machine in virtualbox, it's not like any performance hit would matter anyway :V |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Supreme Commander 2 Patched |
|
| 6. |
Re: Supreme Commander 2 Patched |
Sep 1, 2010, 18:07 |
Sleeeeepy |
|
|
It's ok CT, I know you have a family to feed and probably publishers breathing down your neck. I forgive you for supreme commander 2.
Now let us never, ever, mention the game again. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > World of Tanks Beta Resumes Tomorrow |
|
| 3. |
Re: World of Tanks Beta Resumes Tomorrow |
Sep 1, 2010, 18:05 |
Sleeeeepy |
|
|
KilrathiAce wrote on Aug 31, 2010, 19:15:
Wish this game had actual tank combat and not arcade shoot them up
A lot less people would play it if it did. I'm sure there are some more realistic type tank sims out there, but they won't have mass appeal. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Out of the Blue |
|
| 2. |
Re: Out of the Blue |
Jul 27, 2010, 12:00 |
Sleeeeepy |
|
|
I have a lot of respect for blizzard as a company, and for being one of the major pillars of PC gaming (Valve being another other notable one). I just don't seem to 'get' whatever it is about their games that people love so much - I try em for a while, find them underwhelming, then move on.
Very aware I'm in the minority with that opinion though. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Morning Mobilization |
|
| 1. |
Re: Morning Mobilization |
Jul 15, 2010, 16:14 |
Sleeeeepy |
|
|
| The "solution" better not be to use one of those stupid bumpers. I'd rather deal with the signal problem (not very severe in my case) than deface it with one of those things, even if it were free. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > More on Blizzard's Real ID |
|
| 28. |
Re: More on Blizzard's Real ID |
Jul 6, 2010, 18:46 |
Sleeeeepy |
|
|
PropheT wrote on Jul 6, 2010, 17:56:
That's in game; in game, RealID is optional. This is something else entirely since they're making RealID mandatory to post on the forums.
"The first and most significant change is that in the near future, anyone posting or replying to a post on official Blizzard forums will be doing so using their Real ID -- that is, their real-life first and last name -- with the option to also display the name of their primary in-game character alongside it. "
Ah yes my bad for only skimming it, thanks for the clarification. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > More on Blizzard's Real ID |
|
| 18. |
Re: More on Blizzard's Real ID |
Jul 6, 2010, 17:46 |
Sleeeeepy |
|
|
Hmm I just read the FAQ, that seems to imply that only people you've friended get access to the Real Names bit, which at least firewalls it somewhat. In fact not that dissimilar to facebook in that respect (although fb itself is a whole other arguement).
If it is that way, then yeah maybe not so bad, but still dodgy ground. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > More on Blizzard's Real ID |
|
| 15. |
Re: More on Blizzard's Real ID |
Jul 6, 2010, 17:43 |
Sleeeeepy |
|
|
eRe4s3r wrote on Jul 6, 2010, 17:37:
anyone using this must be out of their mind
Exactly. People just don't seem to get that once it's out there, it's out there. There's no undo button, there's no going back. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
161 Comments. 9 pages. Viewing page 4.
< Newer [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ] Older > |
|
|
|
|
|
Blue's News is a participant in Amazon Associates programs
and earns advertising fees by linking to Amazon.
|
|
|
|
Twitter 
