User information for Hanley
Real Name
Hanley
Nickname
Hanley
Email
Concealed by request
Description
Homepage
None given.
Supporter
–
Signed On
September 30, 2008
Total Posts
48 (Suspect)
User ID
54391
Skippity skip.
I remember waiting a few months for Hitman 2 Gold to be $20 on key sites, I'll do the same with this one.
What gets me is how much people defended these guys after the split with SE, yet here they are still fucking things up like it's second nature to them.
I remember waiting a few months for Hitman 2 Gold to be $20 on key sites, I'll do the same with this one.
What gets me is how much people defended these guys after the split with SE, yet here they are still fucking things up like it's second nature to them.
Like all Far Cry dream sequences, hallucination sequences, drug sequences, Shangri La missions etc, it looks bloody awful. It's not even set in the FC6 game world? The third one doesn't even let you play as the bad guy from FC6?
This has to be the worst Far Cry DLC to date. Ubisoft has gone so fucking stale, it's beyond belief.
This has to be the worst Far Cry DLC to date. Ubisoft has gone so fucking stale, it's beyond belief.
Wouldn't play it for free
Imagine if they made Rainbow Six games like Rainbow Six again. Actual planning, complete gear choice, no childish super hero nonsense or weapon charms etc. Wouldn't that be nice.
Imagine if they made Rainbow Six games like Rainbow Six again. Actual planning, complete gear choice, no childish super hero nonsense or weapon charms etc. Wouldn't that be nice.
$1,499 RTX 3090
Hahaha!
Good one. They're $3000USD on average in stores where I live.
I bet all of this is going to set a ridiculous price precedent for years to come.
I've played it for 5 hours now and it's basically SWAT4 with better graphics and refined mechanics. I grew up on Rainbow Six, Ghost Recon, SWAT etc and really love this sort of thing. Takedown was a complete and utter fucking joke next to this. This, for the first time in YEARS, feels like they made a tactical shooter properly. I was hoping Ground Branch would be what this is now.
It's very satisfying to make it to the end of a level, it's pretty hardcore. Definitely worth the asking price
This comment was edited on Dec 20, 2021, 06:11.
It's very satisfying to make it to the end of a level, it's pretty hardcore. Definitely worth the asking price
This comment was edited on Dec 20, 2021, 06:11.
The Half Elf wrote on Dec 19, 2021, 00:12:
My issue is that it's not the full game. it's "part 1"
Can't have a single 'remade' game without charging 3 times for it
Nothing is surprising anymore
Just when you thought DLC, season passes, live services, microtransactions, paying-to-win etc etc couldn't get any worse, this fucking shit catches on.
So glad I got to game through the early 90s onwards. The poor bastards growing up with this garbage will never know any better.
So glad I got to game through the early 90s onwards. The poor bastards growing up with this garbage will never know any better.
More fuel for the dumpster fire
I hope this is like the originals + Assault Squad and not like Gates of Hell. The first/third person stuff is janky as fuck and detracts from what makes RTS games good in the first place.
RedEye9 wrote on Nov 6, 2021, 20:23:
If only we had believed the first 5,000 altar boys who stepped forward and said the priest is molesting me.
If only we had believed the first 500 boy scouts who stepped forward and said the scout master is molesting me.
If only we had believed the first 10 actresses who stepped forward and said Harvey Weinstein molested me or Bill Cosby raped me.
If only we had believed the first gymnast who said Gary Nasser is molesting me.
Cool Stories bro
if only
So then those people were never believed?
Or were those responsible prosecuted when enough evidence was brought against them?
Your own hyperbolic argument works against you
Beamer wrote on Nov 6, 2021, 08:34:
Them: "known offenders"
You: "the accused"
Them: "no repercussions"
You: "waiting to know"
The situation: not legal
You: whines about "court of public opinion."
You can always count on a few men running to white knight sex offenders in the comments, ignoring all reality to do so.
Yeah, cool story bro. The irony of this situation being that in 2018 I reported sex offences (among many others) against myself as a child and have been struggling to get things moving for years now. But because I have a brain, I realize why it's so hard for these things to progress or to get the desired outcome.
I'm not defending anyone, if they are found guilty then throw them off a cliff for all I care. The problem most of you seem to have is that you only have empathy for one side. If it were you being accused and you were innocent, you wouldn't want things to work in the ridiculous ways that are being mentioned.
RedEye9 wrote on Nov 5, 2021, 23:29:
Shuffling around worked for the Catholic Cult for decades.
Good point. Then everyone must be guilty as soon as they are accused.
Phew, we fixed the world boys, let's pack it up and head home.
Sepharo wrote on Nov 5, 2021, 23:04:Hanley wrote on Nov 5, 2021, 22:54:Dirwulf wrote on Nov 5, 2021, 22:34:That link and those within are the sum total of evidence and wrongdoing that they're making all these demands for?Philll wrote on Nov 5, 2021, 22:25:You mean like the link "released this summer?"....
I suppose this post would make more sense if it illustrated what these offenders had done in any way, and if any of it had been proven/confirmed. They reference a letter multiple times in these demands but fail to link it.
I'd ignore them too, if I was Ubisoft, and I fucking hate Ubisoft.
Yeah it's totally unbelievable that Ubisoft would shuffle around a person accused of sexual harassment and that their employees would be upset about that.
What are they supposed to do with someone who has been accused? Anyone can accuse anyone. I would assume they're being shuffled elsewhere, away from those who make complaints, until proceedings finish to determine what happened, at which point they would either be let go or left alone.
Sorry, I keep forgetting how justice works nowadays in the court of public opinion.
Dirwulf wrote on Nov 5, 2021, 22:34:Philll wrote on Nov 5, 2021, 22:25:
I suppose this post would make more sense if it illustrated what these offenders had done in any way, and if any of it had been proven/confirmed. They reference a letter multiple times in these demands but fail to link it.
You mean like the link "released this summer?"....
That link and those within are the sum total of evidence and wrongdoing that they're making all these demands for?
I'd ignore them too, if I was Ubisoft, and I fucking hate Ubisoft.
If someone is an 'offender', there are already rules and laws that will have them removed. If they aren't being removed, take it up with law enforcement
What sets the bar for someone to be considered an 'offender' anyway? People these days are offended by the simplest things. If you give crazy people an inch of power, they'll take a mile.
I suppose this post would make more sense if it illustrated what these offenders had done in any way, and if any of it had been proven/confirmed. They reference a letter multiple times in these demands but fail to link it.
What sets the bar for someone to be considered an 'offender' anyway? People these days are offended by the simplest things. If you give crazy people an inch of power, they'll take a mile.
I suppose this post would make more sense if it illustrated what these offenders had done in any way, and if any of it had been proven/confirmed. They reference a letter multiple times in these demands but fail to link it.
RedEye9 wrote on Oct 29, 2021, 17:23:The Half Elf wrote on Oct 29, 2021, 17:14:He's owned it since day 1.
Just refund it at this point.
What game store do you know of that has a 10+ month refund policy.
After the court ruling against Valve in Australia, in 2017, I refunded Assassin's Creed Unity after 3 years and ~30hrs game time. In fact, I went through my Steam library and did the same thing for every game that was a buggy mess that had never been patched properly. I was able to cite the issues with each game and how they were still buggy/never fixed. I ended up with around $400 AUD in refunds.
I don't mind that it's like AOE2, I didn't play that game very much. However, the zoomed in issue is the biggest problem. There's no need for it in singleplayer, particularly on PCs. Were not 10 feet away from the damn screen, they need to stop zooming in so damn much or at least give us the option to have it how we like.
For anyone defending these guidelines, why would mentioning Warhead be in the 'dont' column? That wouldn't be helpful to the consumer, it's something they should definitely mention.
And there are no QOL improvements? It's amazing, the lack of effort put into anything these days.
And there are no QOL improvements? It's amazing, the lack of effort put into anything these days.
$60 for a Stadia game? 
This could be free and I still wouldn't touch it. I'd rather take every game/emulator released between 1985 > 2010 and just keep playing those on some old PC. It's certainly what I'll do if cloud gaming ever becomes a thing.
This could be free and I still wouldn't touch it. I'd rather take every game/emulator released between 1985 > 2010 and just keep playing those on some old PC. It's certainly what I'll do if cloud gaming ever becomes a thing.
Copyright © 1996-2025 Stephen Heaslip. All rights reserved.
All trademarks are properties of their respective owners.
Privacy Policy. Manage Cookie Settings.
News CGI copyright © 1999-2025 James "furn" Furness & Blue's News. All rights reserved.
Chatbear v1.5.0/blue++: Page generated 12 June 2025, 15:23.