Cutter wrote on Nov 30, 2017, 11:36:
I can't believe people not only allow these spying devices into their homes but willingly pay for them.

Bludd wrote on Nov 29, 2017, 05:09:

eRe4s3r wrote on Nov 29, 2017, 04:43:
For me CIV6 was the most boring laughable civ game ever, zero immersion, zero feeling like a country leader. Waste of space and time

That was Civ Beyond Earth for me. Civ6 has replaced Civ5 for me, because of Civ5's one-sided strategy; Get high pop and rationalism and then win.

Civ6 is much more diverse and you can't play it on auto-pilot imho.

Cutter wrote on Nov 18, 2017, 17:15:

Ozmodan wrote on Nov 18, 2017, 15:25:

Creston wrote on Nov 18, 2017, 14:43:
Write Ajit Pai a check for $25 (he's a really cheap whore) and he'll be happy to grant you whatever you want.

Well it was a FCC appointed by the democrats that came up with this ridiculous idea in the first place. Can't think of a stupider idea than accessibility requirements on video games.

Well I sure hope you end up blind and deaf and then come tell us how the handicapped don't deserve any consideration or protection. Fucking jerk.

Creston wrote on Nov 18, 2017, 14:43:
Write Ajit Pai a check for $25 (he's a really cheap whore) and he'll be happy to grant you whatever you want.

The Half Elf wrote on Nov 16, 2017, 17:05:
Ok lets look at this as logically as possible.

1) Free content
2) A game with multiplayer already built in is WAY easier to add multiplayer content because of several factors.
A) Minimal voice acting cost.
B) Minimal scripting and programming cost/time.
3)Extends and add's more value to the game, especially to people who do like to pvp.

To say it's ruining the game is pretty far fetched. The "Core Game" was done out of the box, and the other non-pvp content was probably content that couldn't be finish before the game went gold.