SpectralMeat wrote on Sep 29, 2016, 11:01:
I'm not sure I'd want any more "powerful surprises" from Samsung at this point.

DangerDog wrote on Sep 29, 2016, 05:36:
This isn't a case of cutting content, you would first have to make the content in order to cut it.

This ongoing back and forth is a total PR circle jerk for absolutely everyone involved until either the product is released or the day in court happens.

Gaming site needs clicks / views? Write anything about SC. We the gaming public prove it works every time.

Sho wrote on Sep 28, 2016, 13:10:
Didn't they make a Director's Cut of Wasteland 2? Like many I backed this, played it for an hour when it came out, liked it well enough but had better things to occupy my time. I wouldn't mind going back if they turned it up a notch in the DC though. Impressions?

Stormsinger wrote on Sep 24, 2016, 18:17:

Verno wrote on Sep 24, 2016, 13:43:

Stormsinger wrote on Sep 23, 2016, 18:51:
I just stopped in to see what the MRAs were raving about this week. Come on guys, this is -way- too tame...I made popcorn and everything!

Come on guys agree with my views or you're a racist/bigot/misogynist

I didn't figure you for one of them, Verno...but with the apparent butthurt, I guess I missed something.

Dude. I just said they exist. I've read them. Did I miss something?

Choosing between the lesser of two evils is not indicative of a broken system: it's indicative of the democratic system in a big, diverse country working (mostly) as intended. A candidate that gave you everything you wanted, would offer too little to everyone else, and everyone else matters just as much as you. If that compromised choice between far less than ideal candidates is too unappealing, by all means vote your conscious, but don't be surprised that by walking away from an offer to get some of what you want, you end up getting nothing.

nin wrote on Sep 26, 2016, 10:35:
It is when the most they can muster is 10%, with the other two in the 40s. At that point, your vote is worthless. You sacrifice it to make yourself feel better.

Stormsinger wrote on Sep 23, 2016, 18:51:
I just stopped in to see what the MRAs were raving about this week. Come on guys, this is -way- too tame...I made popcorn and everything!

Cyant wrote on Sep 23, 2016, 08:56:
Not a joke at all, console peasants ARE pathetic.

Retired wrote on Sep 21, 2016, 08:08:
But it is a pub game, and just like their Star Wars skin game, no one takes down the walkers - so Rebels always lose. Same way with this BETA. You would get in a tank and go 50-1. That isn't a balanced game.

Mr. Tact wrote on Sep 20, 2016, 22:33:
Yeah, I've never understood why people put up with that. I'm 54 and I have had a checking account since I was 12 when I needed it for my paper route. And the only time I ever paid a fee for my savings or checking account was when I was a poor college student and I let my the checking balance slip below $100 a couple of times. I'm also at a credit union, but I'd be willing to go to a named bank if they had services I wanted but couldn't get at the credit union. However, I don't suspect that would actually ever happen.

And in fact, last year my credit union started charging if you received monthly paper statements. The first month I was charged, I went over and asked about it. Asked, "I've been mailed paper statements for 25 years without charge, why do you need to charge me now?" They waived the fee for my account.

SpectralMeat wrote on Sep 20, 2016, 10:51:

Cutter wrote on Sep 20, 2016, 10:32:
$650US for a Google spyphone? Lulz!

I don't know what you were expecting after last years Nexus prices.

RedEye9 wrote on Sep 19, 2016, 21:20:
Nothing beats an alcoholic passing judgement on other people's addictions.