Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
User Settings
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:
San Diego, CA 07/23

Regularly scheduled events

User information for CH

Real Name CH   
Search for:
Sort results:   Ascending Descending
Limit results:
Nickname Endo
Email Concealed by request - Send Mail
ICQ None given.
Homepage http://
Signed On May 6, 2008, 23:34
Total Comments 352 (Amateur)
User ID 49520
User comment history
< Newer [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ] Older >

News Comments > World of Tanks Adds Racing
9. Re: World of Tanks Adds Racing Sep 30, 2014, 17:37 Endo
Krovven wrote on Sep 30, 2014, 15:05:
Care nothing about the community? What a load of bullshit. When was the last time any of you even played?

Quite a few patches ago they removed anything pay to win. You can now get premium shells using silver instead of gold (cash). Every patch is significant, adding new features, changing up maps, higher quality tank models, graphics options etc etc etc. This last patch 9.3 was probably their largest update in quite awhile.

Oh well. Leave it to Blues News heathens to rant about shit they either know nothing about or haven't touched in years.

FYI Tank Rally is a lot of fun. Knocked out all 50 wins for the rewards in just one night.

Paid shill, or rabid, head-in-the-sand, diehard fanboi. Little difference.

1. Yes, it's still very much pay-to-win. In fact, I've never played a PvP game that was more pay2win. Learn what shit means before you run your mouth.

2. Every patch is significant, ruining more shit and making the game run worse for players.

3. New features include exploding barrels that sound like 3-ton bombs, but not much of anything worthwhile.

4. Changes to maps, making what was already not very good just that much worse. None of the changes were improvements, except the size increase on Murovanka. Even on that map, the rest of the changes outweigh the good. Everything else they changed resulted in complete, utter garbage, like new Severoshit or El Halputrid.

5. Higher quality tank models that no one really gives a fuck about, except they make the game run worse.

6. The racing was fun for like half an hour. Got old fast.

Meanwhile, they continually nerf the ability of normal tanks to turn a profit, while increasing the profit of premium tanks. They have such a problem with players going afk or just quitting battles that they literally put in an automatic punishment system. Gee, maybe if the game was actually fun instead of a pathetic frustrating grind people would actually want to play. They've been steadily losing players this entire year on all their servers. Gee, I wonder why.
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > Titan Falls: Blizzard Cancels Unannounced MMOG
69. Re: Titan Falls: Blizzard Cancels Unannounced MMOG Sep 26, 2014, 20:42 Endo
Flatline wrote on Sep 25, 2014, 19:30:
Kotaku posted I guess what Titan was supposed to be yesterday:

From what I read, it sounded like a snoozefest. I'll pass. And I really expected more than "hey let's take The Sims and cross it with Team Fortress 2!" from Blizzard.
Well shit, that actually sounds like exactly what I'd want from an MMO. I can certainly understand though why it wouldn't appeal to everyone (or perhaps even to most people, which is probably why they canceled it).
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > Titan Falls: Blizzard Cancels Unannounced MMOG
49. Re: Titan Falls: Blizzard Cancels Unannounced MMOG Sep 23, 2014, 23:09 Endo
bhcompy wrote on Sep 23, 2014, 22:42:

Except that they are defined as MMOs.

World of Tanks is the greatest team-based massively multiplayer online action game dedicated to armored warfare.

No they're not. That's just someone claiming their game is something it's not.
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > Titan Falls: Blizzard Cancels Unannounced MMOG
47. Re: Titan Falls: Blizzard Cancels Unannounced MMOG Sep 23, 2014, 22:17 Endo
bhcompy wrote on Sep 23, 2014, 16:52:

Not exactly.. Next gen MMOs are F2P Guild Wars style arenas for the most part. League of Legends and World of Tanks are the definitive MMOs of the current game generation.

Except none of those are MMOs at all, of any kind.

Mashiki Amiketo wrote on Sep 23, 2014, 18:56:
The only reason why traditional mmo's aren't going to make it anymore is because the market is over saturated right now. Way-way-way too many mmo's, because WoW was such a huge success and everyone and their grandma tried jumping on the cash train. Give it a few years with no new releases, and the market to re-stabilize and we'll be back to the monthly sub mmo's that are higher quality and less dumbed down. As something else, they also noticed they made money hand over fist with D3 and the first expansion. Meaning "single player isn't dead" despite all the brain dead marketers trying to tell people that it is.
Yeah that's some good points. When WoW took off, it was possible to name all MMOs in existence by memory in less than half a minute. Now, you probably can't do that just for the MMOs released the past 12 months.

Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > Morning Metaverse
15. Re: Morning Metaverse Sep 17, 2014, 23:24 Endo
So far my favorite voting/moderating system is on Slashdot. It's not perfect, but it works a damn sight better than any simple voting system, and way better than designated moderators too.  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > Transverse Funding Reworked
18. Re: Transverse Funding Reworked Sep 12, 2014, 16:39 Endo
verybad1 wrote on Sep 12, 2014, 15:34:

Please note I don't want Piranha to fail.

I do want them to fail. HARD. They've been stringing along investors for over two years now, delivering almost nothing they promised and making what already existed worse instead of better. And now, they want to leave all their invested customers in the lurch completely and focus their resources on a new cash grab. Fuck them. I want to see them fail so hard they never get a chance to pull this shit again.
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > Evening Metaverse
7. Re: Evening Metaverse Sep 11, 2014, 23:15 Endo
As someone who quit MWO about 20 months ago and is still bitter about that whole mess, this is so so sweet.

Transverse is a blatant "fuck you" to anyone who contributed any money to MWO.

If there is any justice, they will be shadow-banned on Reddit forever.
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > Transverse Announced
29. Re: Transverse Announced Sep 10, 2014, 22:32 Endo
jdreyer wrote on Sep 10, 2014, 13:17:
InBlack wrote on Sep 10, 2014, 02:40:
I gave up on MW:O when I figured out that Clan Wars was goddamn lie. There is no cake.

Now these clowns are trying to poach CR's suckers... Jesus Christ, why not, I dont know, hmmm let me think, crowdsource a Mechwarior single player campaign!!!???

The thing is that they are more than halfway there already. They have engine, the art assets, the physics modeling, weapons modeling, maps and terrain, mechs, mech bay customization UI, etc. etc. all designed and tested. All they need is a story, some voice work, mods to the engine to handle single player gameplay and scripting, etc. I'm sure if they crowdfunded it they'd get a couple mil at least. Use some MWO cash to fund the rest and sell the end product on Steam.

But that could end up actually being a game instead of just a cash-grab. We can't have that.
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > EA Taps Starbucks Vet as CMO
36. Re: EA's Taps Starbucks Vet as CMO Sep 3, 2014, 22:35 Endo
Devinoch wrote on Sep 3, 2014, 19:30:
Oh, my bad. Thank you.

Polite, intelligent analysis in a comments thread? God help us, what have we come to?

EA's made some bad moves and they've made some good moves. I think at this point we as gamers should be cheering efforts to course correct with good moves just as much as we lambast the bad ones. In doing so, we offer positive reinforcement and teach good behavior rather than instilling a "well, everyone hates everything we ever do, so fuck'em" attitude that many jaded people in the gaming industry are starting to get (myself included)...


For the past decade and counting, EA has not released anything worth more to me than a used mouse turd. Why would I care what they do now?
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > EA's $1B DLC Goal
17. Re: EA's $1B DLC Goal Aug 26, 2014, 23:06 Endo
Beamer wrote on Aug 26, 2014, 21:04:
For one, games cost a shitton more to develop now than they used to,

Only if developers choose to spend a shitton. It's been continually demonstrated that even now, most gamers care more about fun gameplay than whatever crap costs a shitton to develop. Yes, you can spend a shitton and develop a successful game. You can also not spend a shitton and still develop an insanely successful game. You can also spend a shitton to develop a steaming pile of feces and wonder why it's not successful, then blame it on piracy or whatever all the while ignoring the fact that it's still a steaming pile of feces regardless of how many shittons of money you spent on it.

And considering how many of EA's games are just rehashed crap of which 90% came from the previous game in the series, I don't think you can make a good case for their games to require high development costs, especially with a game like Madden.
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > Blizzard Financials; WoW Down to 6.8M Subs
31. Re: Blizzard Financials; WoW Down to 6.8M Subs Aug 6, 2014, 09:26 Endo
Muscular Beaver wrote on Aug 6, 2014, 03:49:
PropheT wrote on Aug 6, 2014, 02:49:
Endo wrote on Aug 6, 2014, 01:50:
It'll go up, but not all that much. WoW is on its long slow way out.

The real problem keeping old-school players (like myself) from ever coming back is that they've just changed it too much. All the old WoW we'd want to experience again is long since gone. They'd probably get more re-subscribers if they just re-released vanilla or TBC WoW than with a new expansion.

It's not the game that most old players are missing, it's the people and guilds and everything that made the game what they thought it was back then. The game itself is better now than it was during vanilla or BC... people pining for the old days need to realize that their nostalgia for that period wasn't the game itself but the experiences they had during it, and those aren't just going to re-materialize if that game came back.

Speak for yourself. I and all of the people I know who stopped playing dont like the new mechanics since Cata, how classes got changed, lost many abilities that were there for a long time and dont want something like that happen again. Quests have become boring, because they are all in one place, etc.
When looking at the game after Cataclysm, it felt like a completely new development team got assigned to it (and that basically was indeed the case). That wasnt WoW anymore, it felt like a clone all of the sudden.

The game has been dumbed down a lot, so I dont know how you can say its better now than ever before.

Did you ever take a look at the private servers that try to recreate WoW only up to WotLK and how many players they have?

Precisely. Those things along with the way they changed the gameworld itself completely killed any chance anyone would ever come back due to nostalgia.

I myself played through vanilla, TBC, Wrath, and started Cata. For me, vanilla was good, TBC was the high point, and it was just downhill from there. Wrath was just too much catering to casual players, while Cata was just one giant ball of fuck-up. And since Cata completely wiped away the old WoW I originally came to love, I never had any reason to go back. The WoW I miss no longer exists.

I think the real beginning of the end for me was when they put in LFG queues for dungeons, effectively killing off whatever community the game still had. Virtually overnight, world zones emptied out as players started just sitting in town waiting on queues, and instead of running dungeons with players on your server that you might know by reputation, you started running them with random players you'd never seen or heard of before and never would again.
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > SimCity Trial Version
7. Re: SimCity Trial Version Aug 6, 2014, 01:54 Endo
Or you could just load up the old classic 2K version for free (or dirt cheap, if for some inexplicable reason you don't have an old copy lying around somewhere) and have a much better game for a lot longer than 4 hours.  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > Blizzard Financials; WoW Down to 6.8M Subs
20. Re: Blizzard Financials; WoW Down to 6.8M Subs Aug 6, 2014, 01:50 Endo
Omni wrote on Aug 5, 2014, 20:25:
6.8 is still a lot and I will go up again once warlords of draenor go live.
The only thing that can kill WoW is WoW.

It'll go up, but not all that much. WoW is on its long slow way out.

The real problem keeping old-school players (like myself) from ever coming back is that they've just changed it too much. All the old WoW we'd want to experience again is long since gone. They'd probably get more re-subscribers if they just re-released vanilla or TBC WoW than with a new expansion.
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > Firefall Launches
14. Re: Firefall Launches Jul 30, 2014, 00:44 Endo
jacobvandy wrote on Jul 30, 2014, 00:01:
To have any argument for P2W, it would have to be true that you could ONLY get high-quality gear by paying real money, etc.
I disagree. A lot of games have started using a new trick. You can get premium stuff with in-game currency... it just takes so much of it that the average player cannot possibly do it. You either have to spend about 100+ hours a week grinding, or buy it with real money. Or, in the case of premium consumables, a free player has to make do with less of them than paying players. This is no big deal in PvE, but I very much consider it pay-to-win in PvP.
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > No Stained Steam Keys for Bundle Buyers
10. Re: No Stained Steam Keys for Bundle Buyers Jul 28, 2014, 23:14 Endo
No sympathy from me. The video game industry was built by people making games in their spare time and giving them away for free. Only once you've established yourself should you expect to be able to make a living doing this. Until then, don't quit your day job. That's how entertainment works. ESPECIALLY now with a billion and one games available and more being released every day.  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > Screencheat Embraces Screencheating
12. Re: Screencheat Embraces Screencheating Jul 25, 2014, 13:19 Endo
siapnar wrote on Jul 25, 2014, 09:43:
Points for originality, but there's no way in hell I'd want to play this
My thoughts exactly. Don't think anyone will want to play this for very long.
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > Evening Patches
2. Re: Evening Patches Jul 22, 2014, 23:43 Endo
And DE continues the trend of launching garbage no one wants while fixing nothing. Yes, why don't we shoehorn PvP into a game that is spectacularly unsuited for it, because of a few vocal whiners. Great idea. My only regret is that I ever spent money on it.  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > Guild Wars 2 Entanglement Trailer
5. Re: Guild Wars 2 Entanglement Trailer Jul 8, 2014, 20:35 Endo
Maybe if they got rid of the vertical progression grind I could give a fuck about this game again. I'm not holding my breath.  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > Guild Wars 2 April 2014 Feature Pack
10. Re: Guild Wars 2 April 2014 Feature Pack Mar 21, 2014, 15:41 Endo
Keilun wrote on Mar 21, 2014, 00:32:
Creston wrote on Mar 20, 2014, 21:22:
Oh well, we'll see what happens. I wish Anet had guys as good at developing systems as they have guys who are good at developing content.

Completely agreed. My gf and I have stopped playing GW2 lately because of the poor systems. For me, I have the biggest beef with their living world, skill system, ascended gear and skins.

Living world has been pretty much a grind fest of achievements. It's okay the first time (if you manage a bug free experience, QA?), but after that, they want you to grind the same events at least 5 times over to receive your participation award. Most events ultimately wind up being the same zerg fest you see with the rest of the game, it's pretty uninspiring. I'll admit that the closest they've come to something entertaining was the clockwork puppet boss event in Lornar's Pass.

I've never been a fan of the same restrictive 5 skills per weapon. I'd like a bit more customization than having an offhand weapon set to swap to to open up new weapon skills. Some weapons are plain garbage which exacerbates the problem. Their proposed solution in dev right now? Open up class restriction on weapons... Not exactly the right solution...

Ascended gear has a huge problem too. With gear is so directly tied with your build and the sheer amount of grinding you need to do to get a full set of ascended, by the time you're able to purchase the gear you're left wondering "but what if I want to try this other build"? They have the solution sitting right in front of them (allow them to change stats on the fly), but they're intent on making that a Legendary only capability. They've already said that Legendaries should be purely cosmetic, but apparently that's thrown out of the window.

Lastly, skins. Jebus. I haven't bought a single skin because of this, but I have collected so many from events and such and I still haven't used a single one. Why? Because it's one-time use. If you want to apply it to another item, you have to use GEMS to remove the skin and apply it to another item. Skins should just simply unlock account wide. There's a reason skins aren't selling like hotcakes and I suspect that this is one of them.

The game could be so good it makes me so angry. Grrr. Here's to hoping Wildstar is what we've been looking for.


WTF, did you read my mind?

Coming from GW1, I have been quite disappointed with the skill system from the start, particularly the skills being tied to weapons. And then ascended gear really put the nail in the coffin for me. A few months ago I found the web interview again where they specifically stated the gear system was intended so players would have best stats possible by level 80. Yeah, right.

I gave it another go, trying to get back into the game a couple months ago. That lasted about a month, before I got fed up with the grind for ascended gear again and the fact that all combat encounters have devolved to nothing but DPS spam-fests.

It all makes me sad because we know how great this game could have been if they'd just included more of what made GW1 great.
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > MechWarrior Online's $500 Gold Mechs
62. Re: MechWarrior Online's $500 Gold Mechs Dec 16, 2013, 09:24 Endo
Spaceherpes wrote on Dec 16, 2013, 00:11:
Flatline wrote on Dec 15, 2013, 18:48:
Oh pay2win, where paying real world money gives you a distinct in-game advantage.

Last time I checked, there were premium coolant tanks that let you attack more, longer, that you could only purchase with money. At that point, my P2W flag went off and I quit playing.

You can upgrade the 9 shot to be equal to the 18 shot (the pay version) if you spend GXP. I've only purchased mech slots for this game and I've never felt like I was at a disadvantage.

I don't really see the gold mechs or tiered packages as a problem with the game. Their presentation and timing sucks, but their existence does not. I dislike their pricing model, but that's a different argument. I do see the lack of real updates or content as a problem. Their inability to balance the game is a problem and that makes the upcoming Clan release really frightening. Rumor has it that some long awaited features will be released in January, but, at this point, I'll believe it when I see it.

And the last time I checked the 9 shot still cost enough credits that no one can make enough money to cover its cost every game. And something like that, there's generally no reason NOT to use it to get an early advantage every game. And that's only one consumable out of three you can carry.

Pay2win doesn't mean "if I spend enough money I'm guaranteed to win". It can simply mean that by spending money you will get an advantage that lets you win more often than you would otherwise.
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
352 Comments. 18 pages. Viewing page 4.
< Newer [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ] Older >


Blue's News logo