User comment history
< Newer [ 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 ] Older >
| News Comments > Morning Metaverse |
 |
| 35. |
Re: Morning Metaverse |
Sep 20, 2012, 11:05 |
mch |
|
|
RailWizard wrote on Sep 20, 2012, 01:08:
lol you care to refute? Go ahead.
Refute what? You offered zero evidence. Extra credit for not just making up a number, though. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Game Reviews |
|
| 11. |
Re: Game Reviews |
Sep 20, 2012, 10:42 |
mch |
|
|
First make sure to download the Source SDK 2007 (under tools).
Then, while Black Mesa actually got accepted under Steam's Greenlight, I don't think it's available there yet. You'll need to download it (torrent is probably fastest) from release.blackmesasource.com/
Once it installs, it'll be available in your Steam library. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Out of the Blue |
|
| 15. |
Re: Out of the Blue |
Sep 17, 2012, 21:06 |
mch |
|
|
Cutter wrote on Sep 17, 2012, 18:17:
"Godwin's law" is a meme and nothing more. That sort of reductionism is for uneducated simpletons.
Well you're no fun.  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Out of the Blue |
|
| 8. |
Re: Out of the Blue |
Sep 17, 2012, 16:18 |
mch |
|
|
| Oh come on, we were so close to Godwin's law with that last post. Go the extra mile! Sheesh. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Path of Exile Free Weekend |
|
| 9. |
Re: Path of Exile Free Weekend |
Sep 11, 2012, 13:08 |
mch |
|
|
| It's really not that hard to get into the beta even without paying the $10. I signed up and was let in less than a week later. A friend signed up and was accepted the same day. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Steam Greenlight Adding Listing Fee |
|
| 20. |
Re: Steam Greenlight Adding Listing Fee |
Sep 5, 2012, 16:52 |
mch |
|
|
I'm completely fine with the $100 fee, and good for them to donate it Child's Play.
I was surprised by an op-ed I read earlier ("The $100 fee for Steam Greenlight submissions is exclusionary, and wrong"). I enjoy Ben's reviews (moreso when he was with Ars), but I can't agree with him here.
Sure, maybe the fee might still serve its purpose if it was slightly lower (personally I think the $10 number thrown around is too low), but $100 isn't too high. I certainly wouldn't call it 'exclusionary' or 'wrong'. Like I've seen some others say, isn't $100 just a tiny Kickstarter away? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Spec Ops: The Line MP Knocked By Dev |
|
| 20. |
Re: Spec Ops: The Line MP Knocked By Dev |
Aug 29, 2012, 17:22 |
mch |
|
|
007Bistromath wrote on Aug 29, 2012, 15:50:
InBlack wrote on Aug 29, 2012, 10:58:
One word: Skyrim
nuff said...
No, actually, that is not enough said. What on Earth does Skyrim have to do with this?
Hahaha I was going to say the exact same thing. Whaaaa? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Out of the Blue |
|
| 19. |
Re: Out of the Blue |
Aug 28, 2012, 15:15 |
mch |
|
|
eRe4s3r wrote on Aug 28, 2012, 15:04:
Not really, the "in focus" part is blurry, it is not 100% in focus even if you have it focus on that point. Seems to me, whatever lense they use is either crap, or the lightfield is not resolving in a high enough depth.
Sidenote: As someone who does macro photo's, I would love a lightfield camera that actually gets close to the quality of a good macro lense
Ah, apologies. In that case I misunderstood your original post  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Out of the Blue |
|
| 12. |
Re: Out of the Blue |
Aug 28, 2012, 12:12 |
mch |
|
|
eRe4s3r wrote on Aug 28, 2012, 12:03:
I want one when they don't produce blurry images. Or is it a design limitation?
I think you are completely missing the point. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Dark Souls Resolution Hack |
|
| 6. |
Re: Dark Souls Resolution Hack |
Aug 24, 2012, 13:14 |
mch |
|
|
Heh that's the point I'm stuck at. I'm sure I'll pick it back up and get through it, but man did that place piss me off.
I sort of did the same thing with Demons Souls (in the Swamp). I'll get back to it eventually and play the hell out of it...but apparently not on PC.
This comment was edited on Aug 24, 2012, 13:19. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Dark Souls Resolution Hack |
|
| 4. |
Re: Dark Souls Resolution Hack |
Aug 24, 2012, 12:40 |
mch |
|
|
I read that the original problems with fps in Blighttown was due to enemy pathing issues. I thought they actually improved it on consoles with a patch?
Blighttown was a little slow for me, but not as horrible as some of the stories I heard. Maybe I didn't aggro the enemies on lower levels as much, and have to deal with them trying to find a way up to me.
PS fuck Sen's Fortress  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Steamships Ahoy - Dark Souls: Prepare To Die Edition |
|
| 40. |
Re: Steamships Ahoy - Dark Souls: Prepare To Die Edition |
Aug 24, 2012, 12:07 |
mch |
|
|
Not unexpected but what a shame 
I hit a wall in the console version, and might have considered picking this up eventually to continue, but if they don't fix things then nevermind. They being the developers, not community fixes. Make an effort, christ. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
648 Comments. 33 pages. Viewing page 14.
< Newer [ 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 ] Older > |
|
|
|
|
|
Blue's News is a participant in Amazon Associates programs
and earns advertising fees by linking to Amazon.
|
|
|
|
Twitter 
