Quboid wrote on Mar 29, 2012, 12:49:Exactly. Origin is by no means my preference, but I'm certainly not going to boycott it and not play games that I'm interested in, yet are exclusive to it.Verno wrote on Mar 29, 2012, 12:41:Amusingly, it's probably the highest compliment you can currently pay Origin.True. I have Origin running and functional is about as good as it gets. It's fine, it doesn't get in the way much which is the main thing (and what Steam does well) but I'd rather not have it running at all. FIFA12 is the only Origin game I currently play, although when I finish ME2 I'll probably get ME3.
Tanto Edge wrote on Mar 29, 2012, 12:24:If you don't like their games, then what do you care?Elessar wrote on Mar 29, 2012, 11:58:No, we're really not.Paketep wrote on Mar 29, 2012, 09:57:Boo freaking hoo. While Origin is no Steam, it's functional. You're just depriving yourself of good games.
And no, I'm not going to buy a single player game that requires Origin and has online DRM, even if it's not all the time.
I get to be disappointed by the ME3 ending just fine, and I didn't pay a dime, install origin or accept any of EA's other draconian retard moves.
necrosis wrote on Mar 29, 2012, 12:25:That's required by the game, not the platform it's purchased/ran from.Elessar wrote on Mar 29, 2012, 11:58:You call requiring a online connection to play a game that really does not need it functional? Wow.Paketep wrote on Mar 29, 2012, 09:57:Boo freaking hoo. While Origin is no Steam, it's functional. You're just depriving yourself of good games.
And no, I'm not going to buy a single player game that requires Origin and has online DRM, even if it's not all the time.
Paketep wrote on Mar 29, 2012, 09:57:Boo freaking hoo. While Origin is no Steam, it's functional. You're just depriving yourself of good games.
And no, I'm not going to buy a single player game that requires Origin and has online DRM, even if it's not all the time.
Techie714 © wrote on Mar 16, 2012, 11:00:This. Notable and creative PC Devs working directly with the fans. Let's support this.
It's 15.00 I mean seriously even if you dont like his previous work at least put in to show you support this new model.
![]()
Dmitri_M wrote on Mar 13, 2012, 14:12:I'm not even that interested in Wasteland 2, but I want to support this sort of anti-publisher, pro-creativity movement. So I'll chip in.
Damn I wish I had a kickstarter to give money to. Not into RPGs or adventure games.
Either way this is a very positive development for PC gamers.
Sepharo wrote on Mar 8, 2012, 21:00:Awesome. I particularly like how traffic seems vastly improved. Thanks for sharing.
Early in game footage from GDC
It's looking like a pretty traditional SimCity so far. They also mentioned coal deposits in one of the videos... So adding complexity instead of removing it? I'm exicted.
Halo wrote on Mar 7, 2012, 20:07:I don't see anything wrong with having an opinion with substance. But the senseless pessimism just gets old. Doesn't happen all the time, but it's annoying when it does. Take this WoW thread for example. Generally a negative vibe, but people explain their viewpoint which causes, you know, an actual discussion. What I quoted earlier was just useless.Elessar wrote on Mar 7, 2012, 17:37:
LOL Isn't this just the perfect example of the typical pessimistic circle jerk you find here every so often. Lack of solid information, speculation ensues and then the sky falls.
Thanks Reddit, I can't go one place now where more than 5 people talk about bad about something that it's called a circle jerk. Then more than 5 people say something great about it and they're all companyX employees... It's an opinion based forum deal with it! complaining about people complaining(which i'm doing)is pointless. At least everybody here is forming their snap judgments based on previous games. I think just about every announcement of a game by EA everybody knows is going to be DLC driven, have a collectors edition that costs at least 80 bucks, have a HUGE marketing budget, be simplified to help make it easier for anybody to play (No more game-over you went bankrupt you get a bailout!) have a GOTY edition, and get 91+ scores on metacritic.
panbient wrote on Mar 7, 2012, 15:23:LOL Isn't this just the perfect example of the typical pessimistic circle jerk you find here every so often. Lack of solid information, speculation ensues and then the sky falls.ASeven wrote on Mar 7, 2012, 14:49:gilly775 wrote on Mar 7, 2012, 14:31:
Did I read/watch this right? Only a MP game?
Apparently so, reminds me of the first version of CitiesXL. Not good at all.
Maxis: From innovators to imitators![]()
Ripperjack wrote on Mar 7, 2012, 10:02:You're sadly mistaken if you think swtor is simply WoW with glow sticks. It has it's issues no doubt, but that simplified of a comparison is absurd.
A friends trial offer, so soon after release? This game WILL go F2P within 6 months, if this keeps up. Then you can play your WoW with glow sticks for free, each month.
Fantaz wrote on Feb 23, 2012, 23:58:Dude this is so tired. I'm an avid PC gamer like many here, but you'd think people would just accept shit for what it is at this point. Consoles are where the money is. All we can do is hope that the PC rendition will be good. That's just the way it is and has been for awhile now (ie Max Payne was released 11 years ago).
Max Payne 1 -> developed for PC
Max Payne 2 -> developed for PC (yes, there was PS2 port also and it sucked...)
Max Payne 3 -> developed for console...
having "special graphics hardware support and enhancements" is not the same as actually developing this firstly as a PC title rather than a console port.
Cutter wrote on Feb 22, 2012, 12:08:He specifically said that calling it a gamechanger was a bit extreme. But also not to discount what happened either. So not sure where you're getting that from.
Let's not get ahead of ourselves, Tim. Gamechanger? Doubtfull. More like a one off - or several off. Like everything else it all depends on the end product. After people have done a few of these and been burned a few tims it'll peter out PDQ.
Dades wrote on Feb 15, 2012, 06:59:Do you honestly believe he doesn't view this as a potential investment for a return? Just because all you see are secondhand snipits of a conversation, doesn't mean he's tossing money around without care or consideration of risk. Don't be so quick to judge. We have no idea how he's handling his money, aside from investing in a few projects that he probably intends to make profit off of. All the while enjoying himself.Creston wrote on Feb 14, 2012, 22:39:
While I think Notch is an awesome guy for being willing to fork over 13 million dollars, I also think he's going to burn through all his cash in a real fucking hurry if he starts doing things like that...
Creston
You know how it is when you're young, no appreciation for the value of a dollar. It's how so many people end up with 30k in credit card debt before age 25. Notch will learn the hard way if he keeps throwing money around to satisfy flights of fancy and to hear reddit speak well of him.
jdreyer wrote on Feb 9, 2012, 14:29:This expiriment reminds me of what Louis CK did with his recent show. I think it was a lot more successful than he anticipated and that seems to be the case here with Double Fine. I'm more than happy to contribute and prove this model works, cutting out the some of bloated and greedy publishers.
This will be an interesting experiment. Didn't Love try something like this a couple of years ago? Whatever happened to that? With MC, at least Notch had a fairly workable alpha available for people to play around with before they started paying him cash.
With this people are donating based solely on the strength of Tim Schafer and Double Fine's previous work. I'll be watching this to see how things progress. Now, maybe I can use this an excuse to actually go and play Psychonauts which has been sitting in my Steam queue for a year undownloaded and unplayed.![]()