Timmeh wrote on Nov 4, 2016, 09:55:
I didn't recall stating that I read the article... I in fact only read the highlights for lack of time...

but I pointed out that I could be wrong...

Its really to bad you guys cant react accurately with such enthusiasm about games and other news here instead of demonstrating you have your heads up your ass most of the time..

but bravo on this one!

Not so fast. This is what you said below. Don't act like you're some really nice person and enthusiastic about games when you curse and write in all caps:

can we get some freaking FINANCIAL data in your FINANCIAL report and not bullshit numbers of how many people have played your online game?

Kxmode wrote on Oct 6, 2016, 13:04:
The Bible's view and the belief of millions are that humans have the capacity to live much longer than 115 years. The Bible states we have the capacity to live forever and were designed to do just that. It even says in Ecclesiastes 3:11 that God "has even put eternity in their heart," which explains why so many people believe they can live forever today. Unfortunately, inherited Adamic sin mars our ability to do so. (Romans 5:12) The good news is this miserable condition will soon be expunged. (Romans 6:23; Revelation 21:4) After that, age, cellular degradation, and a multitude of other infirmities will no longer have a stranglehold on our lives. We will, in effect, have perpetual lifespans.

I know many of you don't hold these views. I would kindly ask that you be tolerant of a point of view you don't have.

First thing I thought when I saw that article link was that after Moses man's days were numbered 120 years.

Acronyms in fiction are stupid. Especially long ones.

rudra wrote on Apr 19, 2016, 07:57:

Redmask wrote on Apr 19, 2016, 05:44:
Between that and Star Citizen I'm starting to think kxmode is a Professional Victim.

isnt that the status of all devout christians? btw you didnt mention him being victimized by the minimum wage increase in CA, so just thought id throw that in for consideration

Talk about random...

Wowbagger_TIP wrote on Nov 27, 2015, 11:33:
Ok, according to their support, if you have Steam, the game may not show up in your Free Games list in UPlay. But you can go to the Steam page for the game and down that page a little ways there is a banner that says "Click here to play the open beta". Use that instead.

Thanks. It started showing up in Uplay today. Now, if only a match would come up. This thing seems like it needs more time to bake.

Thanks, but don't think that's it. I wasn't in the closed beta.

It says its supposed to be in your games list when you use the uplay app but I dont see it. What gives?

It goes to show you, it doesn't matter how you spell Kris Roberts, it's still Chris Roberts.

I imagine they expect ppl to use mouse and keyboard on the PC. Who has 2 mice connected? Doesn't seem practical.

Armengar wrote on Jul 2, 2015, 11:08:
thing is, grinding 2500 games to get a tier X is a good thing. The number of poor players who shot up the tiers rather than learn the game shows. If people played the game properly and played the tiers with experience then it would be better for everyone.

I for one hope it does have a similar curve to WOT (for the record I have a single IS-7 at t10 and about 6k games. I have spent about £30 in the game and don't run premium)

I don't find WOT particularly grindy. sure if you WANT to rush then you will need to spend money, if you don't mind playing your garage then I find it is quite fine doing the "grindy" bits on x2 or x5 days.

Agree with all of this. I don't mind the grind because it is a skill-based multiplayer game and the grind is actually fun unlike a lot of MMOs. Its just like playing BF and getting new guns, scopes, etc.

Lego Worlds is dead? I missed that bit of news

Wow $20 for an ipad app. That's crazy

Right there with you guys. I loved the hybrid RTS/action game.

My kids play a lot of minecraft, saw this and wanted to try it. Given the family sharing, I just needed to buy one license so it's a pretty good deal.

Their machines which run minecraft well, run this well too. I expected to see some performance issues given that this is really an alpha but I didn't see any. Anyway, they enjoy it. The missing flying equipment is really as not a big a deal as the multiplayer component isn't there yet. It's pretty promising.

Although the console Travellers Tales games have been quite good, Lego doesn't have a good track record of online PC games. They have been duds in my book so it will be interesting to see if this one takes off.

How is this game? I like that its turn based. Surprised based on the graphics that this is $40 tho.

You guys are so busy trying to look smart you're missing Matt Watkins hilarious response.

My hope is that every other word isn't the F word like it is in Wolf. Not a fan.

I'm pretty positive I'm in the minority on this, but I really don't want a WH RTS game. I'd rather have a turn-based version that's a pretty faithful conversion of the miniatures game.

I like:
* Building an army under a certain number of points and having to decide my strategy before the battle ever starts
* Not getting new units and having to work with what I got
* Going through the different types of turns (move, attack, magic)
* Formations, flanking
* Using structures defensively (as opposed to something in my way)
* Gambling on distance to strike or retreat

Why can't they make a game like this?

Loved Heavy Gear, both the minatures game and the computer game. Not sure why it thudded the way it did.

I can't put my finger on it, but enjoyed Batman 2 more than 3 or the Marvel game.