I'm way off topic now into Cyberpunk, remember how they did Mass Effect 1 to Mass Effect 2? In the intro ME2 your character basically "dies" but is revived/reconstructed with magic. Basically I could see them doing that in Cyberpunk sequels, allowing the player to either import their old look/decisions or make your look different if you wish, V is "revived" with high-tech Ghost in The Shell level magic, but are you the REAL "V" or a Ghost In The Shell, just a fragment of the original consciousness, dun dun dun!

Two things:

1. This franchise is cursed isn't it.

2. The 'good' (sad) endings for Cyberpunk seemed ambiguous as to what happens to V, it almost seemed like they made it that way either for an expansion or sequels in the future. Basically the way I see it, the 'secret' ending may end being canon, but then there are only two possibilities: A. Either he/she survived with some new advanced tech or B. V is loose in Cyberspace pretty much exactly like Ghost in The Shell.

I could see them re-adding stuff that clearly got cut before the deadline in a Director's Cut; i.e. apartments, cutscenes, the original default FemV. I'm not so sure they would be able to change story stuff.

I think people will refer to Cyberpunk 1 like Witcher 1, a cult hit. And down the line people will reference Cyberpunk 2 or 3 as the 'goat' or whatev.

Oh neat that blizzard collection is on switch and pc too.

I don't play cods anymore, no matter what they all look and play like the Michael Bay of video games, but that's not say there isn't a market for that. But really it's not like they have a huge swath of 'huge' real modernish tech wars to choose from.

I agree. Truthfully, I fell for some Veritas thing in the 2016 time frame.

Nice, I'm slowly going through the new campaigns in DE as-is.

It doesn't exactly say the 'why' she did it.

That's neat. IO did the recent Hitman trilogy so I wonder if it would be a mix of that (spycraft, stealth, etc.) plus the actiony bits of 007.

The Half Elf wrote on Jan 22, 2021, 22:50:

jacobvandy wrote on Jan 22, 2021, 20:33:
Nice, it says they not only fixed the bloated save game issue, but trimmed excess from existing saves as well. Not that that will help you if your save was already too far gone and unusable before now.

Problem I had was I had to invest 20 points into crafting and I've amassed 1000's of crafting parts and it's been bogging down my game pretty bad.


So can you actually pick things up now by aiming at them?

If you have that much just pick your favorite outfit or weapon and upgrade it in your crafting screen.

The Sphere Hunter and GManLives reviews are worth a watch.

Some people just don't know when to quit and admit they are wrong.

I like the concept, interesting.

Where does it say it is a Shooter though? Is that assumption only based on Machine Games Studio pedigree?

When I think "Indiana Jones" as a game, certainly "shooter" doesn't even come to mind. I would imagine either Action Adventure Cinematic /w Occasional Shooty/Whip elements (like Uncharted-style games) or a classic Point-Click Style Mystery/Puzzle game (which would be amazing if it were VR, exploring ancient lost places to recover artifacts).

U.S. Democracy would have collapsed with or without social media, you can't have a Democracy and an Imperialist Empire at the same time, history shows it invariably fails but that doesn't stop collective groups from trying. And the rise of that along with the tech to use it is a human culture and biological/evolutionary problem at large (check out the "the social dilemma" documentary), .

Assange should be freed.

For me it's a Deus Ex with cars. They even have the same non lethal baton. The character interaction moments are what keeps me from loading my save back up.

Even so I can tell the game was released too soon and many of their immersion bits were cut from previews. They definitely cornered themselves by trying to create a brand new type of game (for them).

They have 3d radar and targeting computers so the whole cockpits in star wars is a moot point.

Anyways the game is fun, but I wish they wouldn't have adopted the slow speed for everything but interceptors.

In the old games everything felt slow then too but that was a limitation of the perspective/engine (might have made it harder to hit things). Unfortunately you can't live out the fantasy of flying fast in other ships like the Y-Wing aces in RoTJ that you see literally bouncing and destroying tie interceptors. And enemy player ships including your self feel lake laser sponges to compensate for the slow evasion and overall speed.

Imagine if they implemented speed in the way Ace Combat 7 feels for a example, dog fights would be real knuckle clenchers.

They did add a zoom to the revamped AoE 2, more so than AoE 1. I haven't tried their revamped AoE III yet. Anyways, I don't see why they wouldn't add it to the latest installment.

I really hope CD Red can get back on track. A post-launch lessons learned internally and to do better for their employees.

Neat! Although at what point will adding more civs become too much. They could probably just release new history campaigns with existing civ assets, which is what I'm hoping for.