User information for Constantin

Real Name
Constantin
Nickname
None given.
Email
Concealed by request
Description
Homepage
None given.

Supporter

Signed On
August 21, 2006
Total Posts
99 (Suspect)
User ID
26272
Search For:
Sort Results:
Ascending
Descending
Limit Results:
 
99 Comments. 5 pages. Viewing page 1.
Newer [  1  2  3  4  5  ] Older
43.
 
No subject
Nov 24, 2006, 15:47
43.
No subject Nov 24, 2006, 15:47
Nov 24, 2006, 15:47
 
http://newsbusters.org/node/9241

once again proving the NRA and gun owners are crazy bastards. hint= no real reason to own a gun.

"ooh, there's only been one death by a permitted gun owner." yeah asshole, but how many gang bangers out there have them? outlaw them all get these fuckin' things out of circulation. what? 'that is the price of living in a free society' fuck that. europe doesn't have ht problem with guns we do, why should anyone be given the chance to off me because they have acces to guns. it's stupid.

42.
 
Re: No subject
Nov 24, 2006, 15:26
42.
Re: No subject Nov 24, 2006, 15:26
Nov 24, 2006, 15:26
 
honestly, who can't NOT like Borat?


This comment was edited on Nov 24, 15:26.
41.
 
Re: No subject
Nov 24, 2006, 15:23
41.
Re: No subject Nov 24, 2006, 15:23
Nov 24, 2006, 15:23
 
I need to find some way to get 90 minutes of my life back.

Borat fuckin' rocked asshole. u need to open your eyes and quit protecting these people, borat shows the peoples he interviews for who they are.

36.
 
No subject
Nov 24, 2006, 15:21
36.
No subject Nov 24, 2006, 15:21
Nov 24, 2006, 15:21
 
lol@beamer&PJHF

56.
 
Re: No subject
Sep 2, 2006, 00:37
56.
Re: No subject Sep 2, 2006, 00:37
Sep 2, 2006, 00:37
 
People should be able to make and sell whatever the hell they want. It's up to us to decide whether to play it or not, the more choice the better I think.

lol...god. stfu. you believe in letting the average person making and selling explosives? starts getting a little threatening and you'd probably run away from that thought.

what about the second amendment? are you one of those silly NRA evangelists who believe in giving guns to everyone for "defence" and "personal protection" and the "God-given right to bear arms"? let the gun companies make their shit so you can feel good about being american? stfu you silly little boy.

This comment was edited on Sep 2, 00:42.
55.
 
Re: No subject
Sep 2, 2006, 00:33
55.
Re: No subject Sep 2, 2006, 00:33
Sep 2, 2006, 00:33
 
That's gotta be the quote of the century. Nazis = Roman Catholic? WTF are you smoking, dude? Do you even have a brain? Or did that just come out your ass?
Please educate yourself about the Nazi attitude towards religion (and Roman Catholics in particular) before making up shit or spreading stupid lies based on your retarded world view. Thanks.

uh, hate to break it to you, but the nazi party (hitler in particular) had the blessing of the catholic church to exterminate the jews. a blind eye, so to speak. history has laid down a bed of lies for your ignorant mind. you accept in blind faith what has been presented before you. quit playing ww2 shooters and study some real history.

54.
 
Re: No subject
Sep 2, 2006, 00:30
54.
Re: No subject Sep 2, 2006, 00:30
Sep 2, 2006, 00:30
 
And what are the consequences for the rest of the world when a religion dictates that unbelievers should be put to the sword (which both Judaism and Christianity advocate, as well as Islam)?

While we're speaking about evidence, I'd love to see some backing up this statement.


LOL!!! the crusades? spanish conquests in s. america? brit colonial interests in the caribean/africa? good god, just break out a world history book and you'll find plenty of examples.

53.
 
Re: No subject
Sep 2, 2006, 00:27
53.
Re: No subject Sep 2, 2006, 00:27
Sep 2, 2006, 00:27
 
People with strong religious leaning tend to look for evidence that supports their beliefs, rather than searching for evidence that best explains something.

are you serious? the very nature of research is finding evidence that supports your hypothesis.

you just received the "no shit" award for the day.

By confining yourself to religion, you close your mind to new possibilities.

evidentally you've never heard of the great scientists who were also devout christians.

Just imagine, what if religion didn't exist? We'd probably have warp drive and fucking transporters and be exploring the damn delta quadrant by now.

history of theology as spouted by a high schooler, with either/or arguments included. stfu

religion is nothing more than man projecting his image upon himself. thus it acted as a societal glue that kept civilizations together and allow man to reach a point of advancement that allowed science to take a more socially accepted branch of study.

what's hillarious is you're trying to reason that humans are wholly rational creatures. they aren't. hell, we can't reason ourselves into existing peacefully on the earth, so what makes you think we'd jump from basic hominids searching for food to running around blasting shit in the stars? again, you live up to your handle.

Just look at the Dark Ages; 800 years where scientific intellectualism was considered blasphemy and scores of brilliant minds were most likely put to death.

as if the beloved science didn't? engineer a slingshot, before too long you're onto machined weapons, firearms, all that jazz. there's no difference in your reasoning for an either/or argument other than you're attempting to substitute one for the other and failing to realize the human element.

I can't even fathom what 800 years of scientific, medical and technological advancement at the rate we've reached today could have done for our society.

what society? american? chinese? lol, european? such advancemnets typically only benefit those who live within your "society".

STFU


52.
 
Re: No subject
Sep 2, 2006, 00:13
52.
Re: No subject Sep 2, 2006, 00:13
Sep 2, 2006, 00:13
 
The thing about science is that to adhere to the scientific method your theory must be able to be proveable or disproveable.

did they teach you that when you worked beta-tested at EA? too bad the theory didn't carry over to the game. lol.

It is the nature of science that we use the best information we have to explain why something is what it is or does what it does.

or you just call it quantifying an answer to a question with verifiable fact.

This is why there is a huge difference between what is considered scientific fact and everything else: scientific theory. Some things truly are scientific facts; they have been proven under the guidelines of the scientific method and these facts have persisted after hundreds of years.

well, no shit sherlock holmes, these are what are called the fundementals of science.

Other things, like Einstein's theory of relativity, have not yet been proven or disproved, and of course there's "bad science" -- people who claim fact without appropriately testing their hypotheses.

*lolz at random.thought attempting to group einstein with campy "bad scientists"*

there's a degree of seperation between guys who sit in their basements and claim to make cold fusion and a guy who mathematically proved the theory of relativity.

But it is science's constant re-evaluation of itself that makes it easy to believe in -- it is a culture that is constantly trying to prove itself wrong, through the introduction of new ideas, rather than proving itself right by reinforcing old ideas. The reverse of this is religion.

i imagine a theologian or two could run your ass around that statement.

This comment was edited on Sep 2, 00:13.
51.
 
Re: No subject
Sep 2, 2006, 00:04
51.
Re: No subject Sep 2, 2006, 00:04
Sep 2, 2006, 00:04
 
The reverse of this is religion.

lol, you are saying spirituality isn't quantifiable? tell that to the fuckers blowing themselves up in the name of allah.

random.thought lives up to his name yet again.

58.
 
Re: I'm just waiting...
Sep 2, 2006, 00:02
58.
Re: I'm just waiting... Sep 2, 2006, 00:02
Sep 2, 2006, 00:02
 
I'd say Valve surpasses them.

if HL Ep1 was any indication, that won't stand to be true much longer.

I'd say Firaxis surpasses them.

lol, Firaxis doesn't even make the same kind of games. stfu

Microprose definitely did,

the lenses on those rose colored goggles must be an inch thick

Irrational probably even surpasses them.

Well no shit. The first true statement you've made. Irrational only made System Shock 2 and SWAT 4 afterall.

Still, even id surpasses them. Quake, Quake 2, Quake 3, then one stinker.

their storylines always suck though.

Duke Nukem alone gave me more hours of entertainment than all of those games combined.

it was good back in the day. sounds like you've gotten jaded though.

61.
 
Re: Spelling nazi
Sep 1, 2006, 23:55
61.
Re: Spelling nazi Sep 1, 2006, 23:55
Sep 1, 2006, 23:55
 
There really isn't a fine line between in-your-face out-of-context advertising and subversive unobstructive advertising;

yeah, there is.

60.
 
Re: Spelling nazi
Sep 1, 2006, 23:54
60.
Re: Spelling nazi Sep 1, 2006, 23:54
Sep 1, 2006, 23:54
 
Unless EA gets a hold of it. Now we're gonna have in-advertisment games to play.

good lord. what is so different about EA doing this than any other company in some other industry?

the US is capitalistic, so of course they will want to make money.

59.
 
Re: ...
Sep 1, 2006, 23:51
59.
Re: ... Sep 1, 2006, 23:51
Sep 1, 2006, 23:51
 

If you weren't so obtuse, you would see that it was more than just a joke.

which you put too much stock in its relevance. sliding around all silly like bashing valve and ea like it matters any.

51.
 
Re: Not True
Sep 1, 2006, 23:49
51.
Re: Not True Sep 1, 2006, 23:49
Sep 1, 2006, 23:49
 
Trust me they have a lot of sell through in FPS games and the public server player information backs that up.

so? the endgame is to get you to buy the game at retail and load it, they don't care how much you play it afterwards.

57.
 
Re: PHANTOM!
Sep 1, 2006, 23:47
57.
Re: PHANTOM! Sep 1, 2006, 23:47
Sep 1, 2006, 23:47
 
The return, after 9 years of time with one significant other, would be a child.

Clever

yeah, if you're at the Shack. or /.

8.
 
Re: No subject
Aug 27, 2006, 21:10
8.
Re: No subject Aug 27, 2006, 21:10
Aug 27, 2006, 21:10
 
he was trying to ues the handle.

77.
 
Re: Interesting morning
Aug 23, 2006, 21:02
77.
Re: Interesting morning Aug 23, 2006, 21:02
Aug 23, 2006, 21:02
 
hell you guys aren't even worth it.
This comment was edited on Aug 23, 21:02.
32.
 
Re: Logitech
Aug 22, 2006, 21:58
32.
Re: Logitech Aug 22, 2006, 21:58
Aug 22, 2006, 21:58
 
Frederickson die like a monkey.


This comment was edited on Aug 22, 21:58.
15.
 
Re: No subject
Aug 22, 2006, 18:04
15.
Re: No subject Aug 22, 2006, 18:04
Aug 22, 2006, 18:04
 
No venomhed, you can't fuck me. Please stop asking.

can i fuck you? please?

and frederickson too, he's so damn fine with that plastic bag over his head.

This comment was edited on Aug 22, 18:05.
99 Comments. 5 pages. Viewing page 1.
Newer [  1  2  3  4  5  ] Older