Good:
http://jaguarusf.blogspot.com/2006/05/puresim-baseball-2007-review.html
But not as good as Out of the Park:
http://jaguarusf.blogspot.com/2009/06/out-of-park-baseball-10-review.html

There's no reason to boycott a game that nobody is buying anyway. Doesn't really need to be said, but here's my review from three months ago:
http://jaguarusf.blogspot.com/2009/03/fear-2-project-origin-review.html

They get an AP story for a damn fake protest?!?

EA acquired the AP in a hostile takeover late last year.

Still can't save it.
http://jaguarusf.blogspot.com/2009/05/stalin-vs-martians-review.html

Boom:
http://jaguarusf.blogspot.com/2009/04/elven-legacy-review.html
and related boom:
http://jaguarusf.blogspot.com/2007/12/fantasy-wars-review.html

Good for them. There needs to be more concentrated digital distribution for Mac. Justin Long wants to get his game on, too!

Contrast this with the way CD Projekt is treating their 'Witcher' customers

Here's the difference:
Left 4 Dead: console game.
The Witcher: PC game.

Enough said.

At least when we get a fighting game on the PC, it's a good one.

Two months too late.

Review of Rome (although, in hindsight, I rated it a point or two too high).
Review of Expansion

The magic of the Internet deleted the link on its way to Blue, but here is the Out of Eight review of Plants vs. Zombies.

"Misinformation campaign," that's what they are blaming it on? My ass. Left Behind was a crappy RTS. Read for yourself.
I mean, look at all the bad things I list about it:
Difficult and frustrating until you discover pray-spamming (and even then the game does not play fair), no skirmish games against the AI (mostly due to the lack of a competent computer opponent), first few missions are boring with lots of running from location to location, tons of micromanagement, outdated graphics, horrible voice acting, New York City setting becomes repetitive quickly, unit pathfinding needs work, friendly units often block other friendly units, game does not graphically differentiate between primary and secondary objective locations, units have unrealistically small sight ranges, oodles of in-game advertising
Do I once mention the religious aspects of the game? No.

Weird, because Atari was Infogrames, a French publishing company that simply bought the rights to the name. I guess they were slowly pulling out of Europe all together.

Is that true?

Yes. You can use half of them, as described here in my review:
http://jaguarusf.blogspot.com/2008/01/universe-at-war-earth-assault-review.html
I think I almost understand what I was trying to say about the techs.

This comment was edited on May 8, 2009, 20:56.

Is the game completely linear, or is there some freedom in the mission structure? What kinds of things does the game let you do? I have just started playing it and I am stuck in the tutorial (ha!) as are a lot of people, gauging from the message boards.
It seems the Gamer's Gate version is identical to the bugged release version: a lot of audio files are missing and translation errors abound.

This comment was edited on May 6, 2009, 12:25.

I want to see what the single-player game is all about

It's the multiplayer game with bots. That's all.

they plan on releasing the patch in early May

Of which year?

SimBin = good.

A true simulation? Need for Speed?
Are we talking console simulation (like Gran Turismo) or a true PC simulation (like GTR/Live for Speed/rFactor)?

$15 for Men of War is teh awesome.