Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
User Settings
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:

Regularly scheduled events

User information for Daniel

Real Name Daniel   
Search for:
Sort results:   Ascending Descending
Limit results:
Nickname CJ_Parker
Email Concealed by request - Send Mail
ICQ None given.
Homepage http://
Signed On Feb 11, 2006, 23:49
Total Comments 3399 (Veteran)
User ID 24408
User comment history
< Newer [ 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 ] Older >

News Comments > German Fallout 3 Ban Lifted
8. Re: German Fallout 3 Ban Lifted Feb 17, 2016, 05:49 CJ_Parker
eRe4s3r wrote on Feb 17, 2016, 03:31:
This is the kind of situation we are in in Germany. The problem isn't crime from refugees or illegals or the housing or the jobs, or even the costs, it's that feeling that as German you are slowly losing what makes Germany German. Now there is a chance nobody around you speaks German anymore

Yep. This is very true, but to be fair, at least here in Southern Germany I have felt like this for a few years already, i.e. even before the refugee invasion.
When you are walking through the streets here, it has become rare to hear someone speak in actual German.
We have many, many Russian (or CIS folks), Romanian, generally Eastern European, Yugoslavian, Italians, Spaniards (Spain has ~50% youth unemployment so lots of young Spanish people came here in the last couple of years) and so on and so on around here.

The refugee invasion is only exacerbating the effect of feeling like a foreigner in your own country. It is only a matter of time until they will take over. More than 16 million "Germans" have a migration background already and this number does not include the second generation, i.e. people who are counted as "true" Germans (like Turks born and raised in Germany). If you include those people as much as 50% of the population are estimated to have a migration background.

And then there is the simple truth that women with a migration background give birth to 3.x children on average while German women give birth to 1.x children on average. The writing is on the wall. In huge letters.

Merkel is completely fucking batshit crazy. That dumb bitch is flushing our country down the toilet (even faster than it already did) with her retarded dumbass politics. Irreversible damage has already been done. We can only hope that someone is going to be able to somewhat contain it, but realistically speaking, Germany is fucking doomed.

A downwards spiral that will only accelerate the more refugees get here (still over 2K every single day and it's winter!) and the more the problems inside the EU are ignored like the above mentioned youth unemployment in countries like Spain, Italy and France.

Instead of inviting millions of refugees, Merkel should have taken care of Germans first, EU citizens second, European citizens (EU aspirants) third and then, only then, maybe consider accepting a certain contingency of Syrian refugees with a very clear TEMPORARY shelter policy. Instead she invited them all and promised them that they could stay if they want to. The more, the merrier etc. ... as I said... BATFUCKINGSHIT.
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > Evening Interviews
20. Re: Evening Interviews Feb 16, 2016, 15:27 CJ_Parker
OK but who says that a BG3 would have to be 5E? You doubted that Beamdog would ever get the license for BG3 (you did not specify that you meant 5E in your original post). But I would say that it is entirely possible if they deliver good work with Siege of Dragonspear. They are the only developer who has worked on BG since 2002 so why shouldn't they possibly be the ones to make a sequel (5E or not)? One could even argue that SoD kind of *is* Baldur's Gate 3.  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > New GeForce Drivers
9. Re: New GeForce Drivers Feb 16, 2016, 14:54 CJ_Parker
descender wrote on Feb 16, 2016, 13:52:
You seemingly want to (have to?) believe that what you bought was necessary to justify the amount of money you spent on hardware that will be outclassed within a year by DX12 hardware. Really not a brilliant purchasing decision there... LOL ;p

Uuuhh what the hell are you even talking about? I bought my GTX 980 in January 2015 and it has already lasted a lot longer than I thought. I replace my graphics card just about every generation (depending on the performance boost).

I will replace it as soon as the first Pascal boards are out. It's a scheduled upgrade for me already. I'm not a retard who buys a GPU and hangs on to it like a tard for three, four, five years until its value has dropped to zero or it breaks.

I paid about 560 for my GTX 980. When I sell it for Pascal, I will probably make about 250 to 300 (it's a nice and silent MSI so good value) and then buy a new Pascal for about the same 500 to 600 (less would always be welcome, of course).

If you upgrade frequently, resell and do it smart, you will actually spend less than a tard who buys a $1K Titan for five years plus on top of it you will always have current hardware instead of hanging on to ancient tech just to "justify" something as you put it. That's how morons do it but not me.

You can spend a few hundred dollars every year for the difference from high to ultra (and like 10FPS), that's what you decide to do with your money.

It's not about FPS for me. It's about a quality experience. I have a pretty huge 32" display, 1440p and "only" 60Hz. It's all about graphical quality for me and I'm sorry if you're a blind mole but I can actually tell the difference between low, mid, high and ultra settings.
I don't really give a shit about performance as long as the game runs smooth and looks spectacular. You're making all kinds of wrong assumptions.

You are also sounding like one of those oppressed dudes who would get his dick cut off by his wifey if he spent money on his PC hobby. Or where is all that envy coming from?
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > Evening Interviews
18. Re: Evening Interviews Feb 16, 2016, 13:21 CJ_Parker
Well, that 2013 stuff is apparently obsolete because Beamdog is releasing the new Siege of Dragonspear expansion soon. If they were "stopped from touching D&D materials at all in June 2013" then that seems to have been of short effect. They obviously did resolve the "contractual issues" in the meantime or there wouldn't be a BG2EE and also no all new SoD expansion.  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > New GeForce Drivers
6. Re: New GeForce Drivers Feb 16, 2016, 13:09 CJ_Parker
descender wrote on Feb 16, 2016, 12:02:
A 3GB GTX580 still runs every game at or near high settings.

Don't pretend that the hundreds of dollars you wasted on diminishing performance returns means that others have low standards. Most games run just fine without the GTX970 you were hyped into buying by poorly optimized PC ports like GTA5.

Again: You also have very low standards.

If you crank up the graphics all the way in modern games even if it's "only" 1080p then even a GTX 980Ti is not enough in many cases.
Proper AA modes (not garbage FXAA), tesselation, HBAO+, DSR downscaling, ultra textures, and all the bells and whistles can easily push a 980Ti to its limits, even more so if you play at 1440p, 2160p or maybe have a nice G-Sync display with up to 144/165Hz refresh rates.

There is a reason many enthusiasts, myself included, can not wait until we finally get out of this long ass 28nm planar silicon stagnation and nVidia delivers 16nm FinFET Pascal and AMD their 14nm FinFET Polaris GPUs. We will put that power to good use.
You plebeians go ahead and play everything at low settings with Xbone "quality" graphics, no problem, but please... stop pretending like you are even getting anywhere near the same experience .

P.S.: I, for one, still do not own GTA V, of course, because I have a spine and actual principles. I have kept my word not to reward those Rockstar fuckers with a purchase for their exclusivity bullshit and I intend on doing so until GTA V drops below $10 including all DLC. Finally, I have a GTX 980, not 970.
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > Evening Interviews
16. Re: Evening Interviews Feb 16, 2016, 10:44 CJ_Parker
rudra wrote on Feb 16, 2016, 07:58:
CJ_Parker wrote on Feb 15, 2016, 23:31:
How exactly is it "far out of reach" for them?

because Hasbro owns the D&D license.. im not talking about Obsidian or Black Isle here

maybe Im wrong, who knows.. Id figure its not easy to get, but maybe they are ready to whore it out to whoever

Not sure what you are talking about because Beamdog are knee deep in working on the Baldur's Gate license and working with D&D. As I said, they did both Enhanced Editions of BG1 and 2 and will be bringing out a new BG expansion (Siege of Dragonspear) in the near future.

You don't really get more hands-on with the license than these guys so I don't understand how you can say that the license is "far out of reach" for them when in reality they gotz their fucking paws right on top of it!
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > New GeForce Drivers
2. Re: New GeForce Drivers Feb 16, 2016, 10:39 CJ_Parker
Only if you have *very* low standards... like those console peasants!  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > OVERLOAD Multiplayer Plans
1. Re: OVERLOAD Multiplayer Plans Feb 16, 2016, 10:35 CJ_Parker
Hahaha this is becoming very reminiscent of the Descent Underground campaign except the other way around. Descent Underground had its focus on multiplayer and when the campaign ran kind of lackluster they started promising a single player campaign. These guys start off with single player and now add multiplayer in hopes to give the campaign some new momentum.

I have a really cool idea for the next Descent remake project: Why not promise single and multiplayer from the start next time? What a concept! I demand a Nobel prize for this revolutionary idea!
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > Evening Interviews
8. Re: Evening Interviews Feb 15, 2016, 23:31 CJ_Parker
rudra wrote on Feb 15, 2016, 22:46:
also im willing to bet the license is far out of reach for "beamdog" lol

Why? Baldur's Gate Siege of Dragonspear is a brand new expansion for Baldur's Gate in addition to the work Beamdog has done on both Enhanced Editions of Baldur's Gate 1 + 2.

So they have basically worked (or are still working with regard to SoD) on two legacy games of the "license" and one all new entry.

How exactly is it "far out of reach" for them?
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > Morning Safety Dance
1. Re: Morning Safety Dance Feb 15, 2016, 10:33 CJ_Parker
Wow. That Samsung shit is in-fucking-sane. Welcome to 1984.  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > On DOOM's Campaign Length
31. Re: On DOOM's Campaign Length Feb 15, 2016, 04:12 CJ_Parker
Slick wrote on Feb 15, 2016, 01:21:
Fantaz wrote on Feb 15, 2016, 01:06:
when is iD going to get back to making Quake games?

I honestly found out that there was a Quake 4 like last year... apparently it was 2009 or some shit?

Quake 4 is much older, dude. 2005.

And we're talking about comparing the new DooM to a 14 year old game. You really so full of spite to hold a grudge 14 years? You don't think that they could (and seem to have delivered on, according to gameplay videos) pull out a win?

2002 was a long time ago champ.

I'm beginning to get the impression that you live in some alternate timeline, dude . Doom 3 is not 14 years old. It's a 2004 game.
2002 was the leak of the alpha (three levels that never made it into the game in that form, just segments of it).

And, yeah, I'm going to call a spade a spade. The game was garbage and id Software should have started to rethink the kind of games they want to make a long time ago.

Their early games were spectacular because Carmack is a fucking genius and wrote very impressive engines that worked magic for the whole 3D revolution.
id licensed their engines a lot, especially Q3A and many people, myself included, just bought their latest games because we wanted to see the latest spectacle (Q3A as a pure multiplayer game never interested me all that much but I bought it for the visuals).

That time has long gone. Doom 3 was decent looking for its time but it was no longer the fireworks as previous entries in id's line-up. It was generally a time when we started to get more open games instead of id's typical corridor levels.
It was also a time when story-driven shooters made id games look even more older. HL2 came out later in 2004 and ran circles around Doom 3's gameplay and plot.

Seriously, id needs to drop their old franchises or reboot them properly with actual story-driven campaigns. The pure crazy shooting has been done miles better by games like Serious Sam or Bulletstorm in the meantime. A game like Doom 3 is archaic and really has no place anymore since it is neither a competent run&gun game by today's standards nor a good story-driven experience.

Or id need to do what Epic did. They haven't released a new Unreal in centuries (with good reason because that franchise is in the same place as Doom or Quake, i.e. archaic and not necessarily worthy of a same-y sequel) but have turned their engine into a huge success. But with Carmack gone, I don't think that id has the brain power for that anymore.

TL;DR id Software need to reinvent themselves. Drop Doom. Drop Quake. They are archaic and have been left in the dust by better shooters with better stories and even better engines. Reboot everything.

This comment was edited on Feb 15, 2016, 04:30.
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > On DOOM's Campaign Length
3. Re: On DOOM's Campaign Length Feb 14, 2016, 13:20 CJ_Parker
Thanks but no thanks. Doom 3 BFG was boring and repetitive as fuck. It was fucking annoying, too, with its backtracking and constant spawning out of thin air aliens in areas you had "cleared" before.

I'll (very) maybe grab this when I'm drunk during a Steam sale for 4.99 but otherwise not a snowball's chance in hell as long as I'm sober and got my senses somewhat together...
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > Order of Battle: US Marines Beta
4. Re: Order of Battle: US Marines Beta Feb 13, 2016, 15:23 CJ_Parker
Unknown Soldier wrote on Feb 13, 2016, 14:24:
the next expansion is paying tribute to one of the most famous branches of the US Army: the Marines!

I really hope, for their sake, that was a joke. Otherwise I fear for the safety of the dev team.

Hahahahaha well noted
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > Star Citizen's Discount Package for Backers
25. Re: Star Citizen's Discount Package for Backers Feb 13, 2016, 01:18 CJ_Parker
Again: That discount package is for existing backers. If you are not a backer yet and if you want a last chance to get both, Squadron 42 and Star Citizen, for $45 then today is the last day you can buy a package and get both games for $45. You just need to pay attention that the package says "Star Citizen Digital Download" and "Squadron 42 Digital Download".

They will split packages tomorrow and from then on you will only be able to buy either a Squadron 42 or a Star Citizen starter package for $45. You will, however, always have the option to buy either Squadron 42 or Star Citizen as a $15 add-on depending on which $45 package you bought.
These packages will likely be subject to sales and promos in the future so there is no real need to rush anything. This is the typical CIG "OMG last chance BUY BUY BUY BUUUUYYYY NOW OR NEVER!!!!111" scam.

Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > Evening Safety Dance
1. Re: Evening Safety Dance Feb 12, 2016, 20:51 CJ_Parker
What a bunch of fuckers.  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > Star Citizen's Discount Package for Backers
23. Re: Star Citizen's Discount Package for Backers Feb 12, 2016, 18:40 CJ_Parker
BIGtrouble77 wrote on Feb 12, 2016, 17:17:
Where is the $40 package? The cheapest I see are a few $45 ones.

Are you an existing backer? As the news says, this is a backer exclusive offer obviously and you should be looking at this package ... and what country are you in?

The $40 price is before VAT. For me in the EU that $40 package is actually $47.60 ($40 + 19% EU VAT) or if I'd pay in local currency I'd come out at 43.32.
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > Quantum Break PC Plans; Xbox Players Unhappy
31. Re: Quantum Break PC Plans; Xbox Players Unhappy Feb 12, 2016, 18:21 CJ_Parker
DangerDog wrote on Feb 12, 2016, 15:19:
Hilarious, and PC gamers will complain about the Windows 10 exclusivity and that it'll only be available through the MS Store.

Microsoft just can't win.

Of course they can't. They are not a customer friendly company by any stretch of the imagination.

The only reason they are bringing Quantum Break to Windows 10 is to further force people into upgrading and to promote their Windows 10 store. The sole purpose of giving away the free Win 10 key for preordering the Shitbox version except to score Shitbox preorders is to get people to create accounts and claim their PC versions from the Windows store.

Absolutely none of this is customer friendly. What would be customer friendly would be a DirectX 11 release with optional DirectX 12 support for Windows 10 and distribution of the PC game via all available channels from retail to the Windows store, to Steam, uPlay, Origin, everything.

But that is not how the assholes at Microsoft operate. The way Microsoft has been operating for a long, long time now is they do what's best for Microsoft, not for the consumer. They do clearly not give a shit about the consumer and that is exactly why these fucking losers have fallen so far behind other competitors (no, I'm not saying that everything is perfect in Google and Apple land but those companies at least give HALF a shit about consumers compared to Microsoft's ZERO flatline).

People can be upset when you say that it's an xbox exclusive only to change your mind. Let's say someone bought xbox for Quantum Break. They could justifiably think they were shafted thinking that's the only way they could play it

I have zero sympathy for impatient dumbfucks who buy a Shitbox on the loose promise of a SINGLE (or even a couple, say less than a handful) exclusives. They fully deserve to be screwed in the a like this. Makes me LOL big time just thinking about their dumb faces at the sight of these news.
Preordering a console for an alleged exclusive is even dumber than preordering games. Anyone who is that mouthbreathing dumb is simply asking for it...
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > Quantum Break PC Plans; Xbox Players Unhappy
21. Re: Quantum Break PC Plans; Xbox Players Unhappy Feb 12, 2016, 12:48 CJ_Parker
MacLeod wrote on Feb 12, 2016, 11:09:
I'm confused. What exactly are people complaining about? The game was originally Xbox One only, then they announced they'll release a PC version (with cross save compatibility no less), and giving it to every preorder for free... What is there to complain about??

It's only the Shitbox kiddies complaining that it is no longer a Shitbox exclusive. No PC gamer is complaining (or if they are only about the steep system reqs).
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > Star Citizen's Discount Package for Backers
7. Re: Star Citizen's Discount Package for Backers Feb 12, 2016, 10:59 CJ_Parker
CrimsonPaw wrote on Feb 12, 2016, 09:44:
Will this project ever come out of beta

Beta? According to the cultists it is still in pre-pre-pre alpha. Beta is far, far away...
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > Quantum Break PC Plans; Xbox Players Unhappy
9. Re: Quantum Break PC Plans; Xbox Players Unhappy Feb 12, 2016, 10:54 CJ_Parker
eRe4s3r wrote on Feb 12, 2016, 09:21:
And there is no 4GHZ Intel Core i7-4790 either, that thing has 3.6GHZ

Uh what? The i7-4790K absolutely has a base frequency of 4GHz and a turbo boost frequency of 4.4GHz and the non-K variant has a turbo clock of 4GHz so it will run at 4GHz, too, as soon as some load is on the CPU.

Did total nooblets make that listing with zero clue about hardware???

Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
3399 Comments. 170 pages. Viewing page 31.
< Newer [ 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 ] Older >


Blue's News logo