Kxmode wrote on Aug 27, 2018, 16:39:
Mainly video games for people who can't afford the system. So now we have three tiers of gamers. The PC Master Race, the console peasants, and the gamer dregs consisting of Xbox One X renters, casual Phone apps, and Microsoft Solitaire. Ironically that last segment is probably more profitable than the prior two.

I'm already in all three of those categories. There is good stuff happening everywhere, and some indie stuff is better on Switch depending on your lifestyle. Sure PC is the best, but to play the laterst stuff at least at QHD it would cost as much as buying every single console. Shit, even my mid range 2016 video card cost more than any console currently on the market at the time.

Probably going to crack and get an S if it takes much longer for this deal to reach AU, or if it gets here and is even more ridiculously overpriced. Sure it is just Sea of Thieves MP with the kid and Master Chief collection I want, but the backwards compat isn't bad, and the X is currently the best place to play Read Dead Redemption.

That said for the price of an S I could get Track IR so I can have less excuses for being rubbish in DCS... god this hobby is a money sink. I kind of wish I was just a narrow minded single platform supremacist sometimes.

Just Ban them for all but a few reasons, and put enough tax, checks and paperwork between the punters and the deathsticks and it will be much better.

Existing ones are fine, though a buyback scheme can help thin the herd. Once they are worth 10x as much to purchase legally, the black market will follow and impulse murder/suicide will drop dramatically. You'll still be able to hunt, use on the farm, target shoot and even collect them but you wont be able to go buy one for a weeks pay at the mall. See ALMOST EVERYWHERE ELSE for examples.

But I know you wont do anything, yanks will invade other countries for less than what plentiful cheap firearms do to your populace in a week and and most your leaders are in the pocket of the MiC.

And whats this fix mental health thing? Yes it's underfunded and people need more help then they are getting but you are not gonna prevent this kind of lunacy. Most mentally ill people are not murderers. You want to round up the crazies? Really? I'm pretty sure that ignores even more parts of the original constitution and amendments, most of which are far more useful than the one there to prevent slave rebellions in the late 18th century.

I thought you needed your guns for freedom but the answer you gun nuts go to first is locking people up for pre-crime because they seem a bit unstable. What a joke.

Any outrage over inclusivity in games is so bleeding stupid. Made up fantasy war? That describes EVERY Battlefield. Even the first one. It's a reality themed nonsense game. We've had jetpacks and guns that don't jam and can be used in/after being immersed in water and being teleported into active vehicles that never suffer mechanical failures and which you can drive/fly with almost zero training for over a decade and a half. Some of us enjoy it.

BF1 actually did a pretty good job of giving the player some sense of what the last months of WW1 looked like, in a way that no other AAA game has ever tried, so give it some props. Maybe BFV will do the same for some lesser known parts of WW Deuce. But it was also ridiculous, fun nonsense like the screenshot I got of my Dad standing on the turret of a small tank in the streets of Amien mowing down Germans in 1918 like an avenging angel of Mons back for action.

Plenty of games go for more realism, but even then it's all just a pretend fantasy war. Short of 1hr server bans for player death which nobody is going to do it's all nonsense.

I mean, I know no ladyfolk have viewed or posted openly on Blues in living memory but it stinks of the privilege of a bunch of babies who are used to being able to identify with the vast majority of game avatars by default that a bit of creative anachronism has them decrying the fall of civilization, whilst they continue to swallow a huge bag of unhistorical garbage in all but the most grognard of hex based strategy games. Get a grip.

I for one would trade the 30 trumptarded sexist monsters in every BF game for the ability of my daughter to play dress ups before squad ups. God if they boycott it permanently I'd preorder every BF game from here till the end of time.

MoreLuckThanSkill wrote on Aug 22, 2018, 22:03:
Well, I'm interested, because MoW:AS2 is an amazing game, but this smells a bit cash grabby, since MoW:AS2 is what, 4-5 years old now, and the company theoretically moved on to a new franchise, Call to Arms?

I'll have to check it out though most likely; Assault Squad 2 is awesome.

Fantastic game, but a lot of the post release stuff has fallen flat for me. My old man and I love the co-op though so are always up for more of it. I wish more strategy games let individual soldiers do their own thing. It's not quite close combat but watching some survivor go rambo in a trench unbidden, or a lost grenadier assassinating a tiger stupid enough to be caught without infantry screening is always amazing.

Interesting! But yeah, the series is far more miss than hit at this stage. But it's been a while. Maybe they can make something good.

Remaking Settlers II wouldn't cut it, but it would make a good starting point.

The Colonists is my current hopeful heir to that throne. Lets see how it turns out.

DangerDog wrote on Aug 14, 2018, 20:02:
Depends on how detailed the simulator is, it's crazy the amount of detail DCS A10 has in just the startup procedure.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a4VuDetuPmA

It's not like there's never been a case where people in the tower have been able to walk people through the procedure of landing a plane with little experience.

At any rate I feel 100% qualified to fly X-Wings, Tie Fighters and a assortment of other spaceships.

Yeah, DCS is insane. After the last few weeks of practicing I feel like I could start up from cold, take off and land an F18 on a ground airstrip, and maybe make the carrier 1/8th of the time (I'm working on it). Of course military jets are defended by guys with guns and carriers have PDW's to stop people getting close.

If the commercial simulators have planes with an accurate virtual cockpit like DCS you could probably learn it pretty quickly, this guy didn't seem to pay too much attention as he didn't know the autopilot, oxygen controls or fuel by the sounds of things. I've worked ground crew and security isn't all that, if you want minimum wage workers to do all the work then you need to let them in, on, under and around aircraft that are worth up to hundreds of millions of dollars.

It's actually amazing that hundreds of thousands of groundcrew employees all over the world are dedicated to making sure your flight leaves on time instead of blowing up or having doors that were not closed properly pop off in flight or planes running off the edge of runways because the weight on the paperwork wasn't logged properly or the toilets emptying out. I mean, there are sensors that are meant to check all this stuff but they go out of service as well.

In an ideal world, yes, but the refund policy is mostly about meeting some jurisdiction's regulatory requirements for the game to be functional as opposed to "I played for 5 hours and decided I don't like it", something that should be clear within 2 hours.

If stores like Steam thought refunding products because their customer decided they just didn't enjoy it then a lot more of them would let you get refunds, or at least trade your keys, long after purchase. It seems to me that there would be a niche for such a store if publishers themselves thought such a policy was useful. DRM free is working out for GOG so maybe it's not so far fetched that such a policy might be considered in the future by someone.

I can see why they are going for the streaming thing. Lots of kids and people in poorer countries (or even people in rich countries suffering from under employment) would take blurry, laggy games over no games or watching them on twitch.

Will it affect us nerds who spend thousands to get the good stuff? Probably. Some designs might get compromised in order to run as a stream, like cross platform stuff today is made with consoles in mind. Might also help. If hundreds of millions more customers suddenly open up it becomes easier to justify insane expenditures like The Witcher 3, a game that would never have happened if it wasn't for console install base to help ameliorate the risk.

Hells yes. Seems like more of the same but refined, made more insane and with online play which is exactly what it needed. One of my favorite local co-op games of the last few years.

Wonder how that Steam decline stacks up against fortnite's popularity.

Could epic use it to launch their own store? Valve just needed Halflife 2 and Counterstrike. Gotta be someone there thinking how to leverage those numbers.

Cutter wrote on Jul 8, 2018, 11:38:

HoSpanky wrote on Jul 7, 2018, 13:06:
At least the article finally mentions ina short per that people who have jobs that are relevant are finding a booming economy, but they immediately turn away from that. Instead they focus on people who very much seem to think someone else needs to take care of them. It isn’t someone else’s job to make sure your skills are something that’s still relevant.

Actually it is. A plethora of broke, hungry, angry people are what cause bloody revolutions. There's more than enough to go around and at least keep the masses pacified with an UBI.

This seems like common sense but so many people seem religiously committed to turning the clock back to the times where we just let people die in the street, forgetting the causes of the revolutions that brought autocracy to many parts of the world that the New Deal and Western socialism evolved to prevent in our own countries.

But if you elect someone with the corrupt real estate acumen of Crassus and the pathetic need for public adoration of Pompey then maybe you want the republic to fail and arise anew as something more orderly and undemocratic. Not seeing how that makes things better myself.

This is one of those games that is obviously amazing, well supported and beloved by those that try it. I can't get into it. Tried 4 times on different platforms.

Everything they add seems like "Oh, that is what Destiny should add!" but when I play it I hate it. Maybe it's the UI overload, or the bleak post-human art style (That is looking a little more mainstream every time I look at it) or maybe the 3rd person shooting thing, though there are plenty of 3rd person games I love so probably not. Oh man I feel like I'm missing out. It's not like Fortnite where the very concept doesn't appeal to me even if I can see it's executed superbly.

Great, now I'm one of those assholes that post to a thread just to say I hate something. Good work Bluesnews, it only took a few decades but you got me!

Slick wrote on Jul 1, 2018, 19:54:
Nice to see FFXV on the list, maybe it's on sale?

I really liked that game, the first RPG I got the wife to ever play through with a controller on the console, and it was her first JRPG too.

She just started Nier: Automata, which got great reviews, I'm next in line to play And I'll say this, from someone who didn't grow up with games, and who's new to using a controller you'd think she'd have a hard time with the Platinum Games style of action, but I wanted to push her a bit, and she's really taken to it, we're on day 2 and she's about 7 hours in and not giving up the controller.

Apparently, it takes 20 hours to beat, but then there are 4 more endings you should play through, and the fifth one "route E" is supposed to me genuinely amazing in a mindfuckery kind of way. One major review outlet said something like: "The night I beat Nier: Automata, I slept well. The night I REALLY finished Nier: Automata I couldn't get a wink"

For the reference, time to beat average says 20 hours for first playthrough, 6-7 for each other one, but can go faster by skipping everything but main quests. 60 hours for a completionist run.

Man, really wanted to get on the Nier train as it sounds amazing but the game runs and looks like rubbish on my PC and I had multiple showstopper bugs (No crash, just mission triggers didn't hit or something). I was expecting PS3 era graphics but it feels somehow worse.

Dragons Dogma: Dark Arisen was a little rough but at least it was sharp and fluid. Maybe I'll get it on console when I see it cheap.

It's hard to be mad at them. I'm not smart enough to make these idiots/kids send me billions of dollars for digital art assets.

I prefer PUBG, my years with ARMA make the clunky but slightly less horrible PUBG movement seem amazing. Someone needs a game that does PUBG ranged combat with battlfield/cod close range stuff and BF1 graphics/detail at PUBG map sizes and then we are golden.

I play a lot of games with my 9yo, who is still deep in the Minecraft phase of drawing plans for buildings she will make when the weekend rolls around but she said Fortnite is what all the kids at school are playing. If it's a fad it's a massive one.

Suppa7 wrote on Jun 23, 2018, 10:04:
The reality is many of the dubbed anime from the past have been superpassed. Mobile Suit gundam 00 is probably one of the best mech animes ever made. The old Macross is stale, they really have had a hard time not fucking up macross, I wasn't a fan of frontier or macross delta.

I'd rate gundam seed / Gundam 00 greater than macross at this point in anime history.

There is so much anime now that old classics aren't talked about much anymore like Evangelion or Ghost in the shell.

It's too bad GITS got worse, the first version being the best gits. They took Ghost in the shell in odd directions after the first movie. Especially with stand alone complex.

I mean, yeah? I fell off the Anime train in the late 90's because a lot of the older series just went to shit (Like Macross, gundam seemed to shit the bed as well for a while there) and the newer stuff was mostly about Anime girl tits for some reason. Even if the new stuff is good (I wouldn't know) it doesn't detract from how fucking mind blowing that old 70's/80's stuff was compared to the domestic offerings at the time, and how lucky some of us were to get the heavily edited versions of them in the west snuck into state programing before and after school. I mean, they couldn't hide the fact the earth was all but wiped clean of life in half of them! (Whoever was responsible for those early cuts of Nausica should be arraigned for crimes against humanity in the Hague though).

0083 and earlier Gundams, most Captain Harlock films and older Macross and heaps of stuff I've forgotten were pretty phenomenal when I caught up with them in the mid 90's. I still watch the more recent dubs of the early Ghibli movies multiple times a year with my daughter and some are amazing, like Laputa, Lupin III and Nausica and so much more interesting and nuanced than the drek they think kids should be watching these days. A lot were well ahead of their time in having awesome, complex girl protagonists with agency, personality and flaws which I really appreciate and never realised how rare that was in media aimed at kids until I started to raise a kid myself.

Cutter wrote on Jun 23, 2018, 23:05:

Creston wrote on Jun 23, 2018, 22:56:
It sounds to me like you guys are just trying to scam people out of two million dollars.

That's probably it. Can't imagine the property is worth anything remotely close to that. Or ever would be even if they won it all and got a game made. And even if they raised the money and won how the hell could they afford to make a game anyway? Yeah, sounds pretty scammy all around.

It's personal though. This IP meant something to them, something they poured years of work into. Something others have attempted to emulate (Star Control 3) and failed at miserably.

It seems petty but SC2 is one of the earlier games where there is a real sense of authorship, with writing and humor that mostly nails the landings.

The Stardock project has a lot to prove, after their MOO came out and was competent yet missing that spark that makes those early 90's PC games still amazing experiences today. Not that Paul and Fred seemed likely to live up to the previous title either but I can appreciate how they may feel protective over their legacy. Their Activision projects made millions but I imagine Star Control was professionally more fulfilling and important to them than kids/toys to life games.

Mordecai Walfish wrote on Jun 22, 2018, 20:59:

Cutter wrote on Jun 22, 2018, 20:18:
I don't recall this Robotech cartoon but I did watch a lot of Battle of the Planets.

Robotech was pretty awesome. Not many cartoons willing to kill off the entire cast in an episode or two and then just continue on with their descendants and a new story/cast in the following episode.

It was amazing back then, but it's a butchered version of Macross whose transforming space fighter plane robots, whilst not retconned out of BATTLETECH, are effectively extinct in the lore and most BATTLETECH products to avoid legal issues with the licensing nightmare.

I think Astroboy has aged well but a lot of the early attempts to make early anime palatable to western audiences sucks. Still compared to what kids today get, Robotech (Macross), Star Blazers (Space Battleship Yamato), Battle of the Planets (Science Ninja Team Gatchaman) and Astroboy (Mighty Atom) are fucking amazing. The villian/ally of the week almost certainly died in every Astroboy episode. I pity the generation after mine that only knows episode length advertisements for toys that can never kill anyone because gotta sell those toys (Transformers, Pokemon).

In Australia all this shit was shown before and after school on State media. I assume it was psyops to try and raise a generation of sci-fi nerds who would then get into science. Which worked but then we defunded science and they all went to work in the US which sells technology back to us for massive profits. Or maybe it was to help us love Japanese culture and forget about all the great uncles that died fighting the empire in South East Asian jungles.

Surprised Cutter didn't know Robotech, I thought most this stuff was dubbed in Canada. I know a lot of it didn't make it to the US.

Oh, and fucking THIS https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ev1aBt-_Zs4

Prez wrote on Jun 18, 2018, 12:50:
No, PUBG is not an asset flip. It is a complete, skillfully designed game that happens to use Unreal assets. That said, fuck them right up their Blue Hole for being so arrogant as to sue people who made a vastly more unique-looking and visibly recognizable game than their generic-looking eye sore. Nothing in PUBG can remotely be called original in the least. It looks like any number of amatuer Arma mods.

I kind of like the generic quasi-realistic graphics and ARMA-esque movement of PUBG over Fortnite. Sure it appeals to kids (Mostly through being free) but sometimes less kids is a good thing.

But the lawsuit is pretty stupid. They could have used an engine made by someone who doesn't make games if they were that worried about conflict of interest.

I think the cartoon look (And physics) the series was known and loved for just started to look too stupid as they got higher definition.

They should probably add a bouncy mode for old times sake, but I wouldn't call the new costumes unsexy, just less impossible to fight in. I mean, form fitting ninja outfits are pretty hot.

Cutter wrote on Jun 19, 2018, 21:40:
It's going P2W? How sad.

How is it PTW Cutter? I think the different vehicle meshes can affect the ball slightly differently but none of the existing ones are considered more powerful than any others. Just different. They have already have hundreds of different cosmetic things that unlock in the game, with more coming for free. This just gives people a way to get extra pretty shit by sending the devs money.

But I assume you misread the announcement because you are sad it is going P2W, which I imagine you wouldn't be if you hadn't played and liked it.

I'm not even sure how you would make rocket league P2W short of giving you slow mo or goals for dollars or cars that go faster or have more boost or fly better or something. I think it's only as popular as it is because everyone is always on an even footing with only lag, skill and platform performance/display tech the difference.