User information for wakeup

Real Name
wakeup
Nickname
wakeup
Email
Concealed by request
Description
not a cheerleader
Homepage
Signed On
February 10, 2006
Supporter
-
Total Posts
34 (Suspect)
User ID
24397
Search For:
Sort Results:
Ascending
Descending
Limit Results:
 
34 Comments. 2 pages. Viewing page 1.
Newer [  1  2  ] Older
6.
 
Re: Fair Game
Oct 1, 2006, 23:48
6.
Re: Fair Game Oct 1, 2006, 23:48
Oct 1, 2006, 23:48
 
Yeah, like the US invading Iraq for no good reason, right?

4.
 
Fair Game
Oct 1, 2006, 04:14
4.
Fair Game Oct 1, 2006, 04:14
Oct 1, 2006, 04:14
 
US games have, since the dawn of gaming, allowed players to play at killing the citizens of many other countries, not to mention blowing their s**t up .. so ..

9.
 
No subject
Jul 8, 2006, 15:27
9.
No subject Jul 8, 2006, 15:27
Jul 8, 2006, 15:27
 

Looks like they are running over themselves - LOL!

F'EM!

21.
 
No subject
Jun 23, 2006, 19:56
21.
No subject Jun 23, 2006, 19:56
Jun 23, 2006, 19:56
 
INEVITABLE! Given the backwards a**ed bible-thumping anti-science idiots on the right, and the mindless masses that support them. Together they are endangering the future of mankind, by ignoring what most everyone else sees is clearly on the horizon.

If the "business as usual" crowd doesn't turn to pro-active problem-solving and REAL long-term investment within 10 years, then Americans should .. for the love of God .. kill eachother.

5.
 
No subject
May 28, 2006, 18:56
5.
No subject May 28, 2006, 18:56
May 28, 2006, 18:56
 
He's not a dictator, fool. He won a two-thirds majority in 2000, and survived a referendum in 2004. In-between, the people themselves prevented the coup from succeeding, in 2002, as they took to the streets.

Hugo Chavez, in comparison with George W Bush, is far more legitimate a leader!! Less than 30% of Americans approve od Dubya ... does that make him a fascist dictator?

And how do you equate policies that benefit the impoverished majority with fascism?

Educate yourself. Don't be such a freakin parrot.

This comment was edited on May 28, 18:57.
2.
 
No subject
May 28, 2006, 18:30
2.
No subject May 28, 2006, 18:30
May 28, 2006, 18:30
 
I think the letter serves to expose the hypocrisy quite nicely, and if it gets Bono to pull some strings to kill that game, all the better. It's a sick concept for a game, especially when the US administration was behind the attempted coup a couple of years ago, and their support for the neo-liberal gangsters that were in power before Chavez, and hostility toward him now all indicate that such a scenario is not beyond the realm of possibility. Such an invasion would be a crime against humanity - and although some thoughtless punks out there think that's fair game for a pos game, those of us who are not as dumb as s**t do not.

5.
 
No subject
May 22, 2006, 08:00
5.
No subject May 22, 2006, 08:00
May 22, 2006, 08:00
 
You're over-rated Koster.

6.
 
No subject
May 19, 2006, 16:44
6.
No subject May 19, 2006, 16:44
May 19, 2006, 16:44
 
Yes, a ton of shit on there.

1.
 
No subject
May 19, 2006, 05:15
1.
No subject May 19, 2006, 05:15
May 19, 2006, 05:15
 
BWAHAHA PSP, that POS .. they can't give it away! I regret the day I purchased mine. I feel the same way that every PSP purchaser should feel - like a *ing idiot!

DIE SONY, DIE!

20.
 
No subject
May 8, 2006, 16:40
20.
No subject May 8, 2006, 16:40
May 8, 2006, 16:40
 
I wrote a series of emails to Bioware begging them to do it a few years back. I played many hours of the PnP and it is by far the best setting for a very large, PC-based RPG, as well as having the makings of the ultimate MMO.

Whoever does it should have a mature audience in mind, and put a little Fallout spirit into it.

I played the old console versions, and they were fun, but no way a console can do it justice. It has to be a real RPG, with THICK PERSISTENCE.

Most of all, it's long overdue!

18.
 
No subject
May 8, 2006, 16:32
18.
No subject May 8, 2006, 16:32
May 8, 2006, 16:32
 
Fan-f*king-tastic.

You punks don't deserve it, BUT I DO!


13.
 
No subject
May 8, 2006, 06:52
13.
No subject May 8, 2006, 06:52
May 8, 2006, 06:52
 
"Gore never invented, or came up with anything to his credit regarding the internet, plain and simple."

UHHHH.. F THAT, AND FU, YOU CLUELESS PUNK!

http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue5_10/wiggins/

"Any fair review of the legislative record makes it clear that Senator Gore was an early and forceful advocate for high-speed national networks, and that he understood how this vision could lead to widespread benefits for the citizenry and for commerce in the United States.

No doubt that record is what he sought to convey in his answer to Blitzer. If Al Gore had chosen a slightly different formulation for his extemporaneous statement, none of this discussion would have ensued. For instance, this statement might have avoided the repetition and ridicule:

While I was serving in the Senate, I took the initiative in supporting the basic research necessary to create the Internet as we know it today."

5.
 
No subject
May 7, 2006, 00:00
5.
No subject May 7, 2006, 00:00
May 7, 2006, 00:00
 
wtf is a gbore?

2.
 
No subject
May 6, 2006, 18:24
2.
No subject May 6, 2006, 18:24
May 6, 2006, 18:24
 
Enough with the Gore/Internet jokes!! It has always been f*king ridiculous to attack that man over that misquote/minor stumble!

THE FACTS ARE .. Gore played an instrumental role opening the Internet up for public/commercial use, through legislation. He championed the cause before anyone outside of the scientfic/hacker community even knew wtf it was!! I remember watching an interview with him back in the Reagan-era pushing for it, and he wrote a great foreword to one of the first for-public consumption guide books.

So enough Gore bashing, if it wasn't for him you'd be stuck simulating sex between GI Joe and your little sister's Barbie, punk.


25.
 
No subject
Apr 26, 2006, 15:26
25.
No subject Apr 26, 2006, 15:26
Apr 26, 2006, 15:26
 
dickhead of the day!?

OH NOOOOOOOO, SAAAAYYYYYY IT ISN'T SOOOOOOOO!!!!!!

LOL! punkass, you're so weak your cat can do you in. Hopefully it gets tired of you trying to shag it, and does just that.

18.
 
No subject
Apr 26, 2006, 06:45
18.
No subject Apr 26, 2006, 06:45
Apr 26, 2006, 06:45
 
Every time I hear of an animal attack on a human, especially one ended in death of said human, I am very pleased.

The more the merrier - especially North Americans, and people on vacation.

14.
 
No subject
Apr 7, 2006, 05:56
14.
No subject Apr 7, 2006, 05:56
Apr 7, 2006, 05:56
 
I don't mind D&D Online ..

.. as long as all the idiots who subscribed stay there and the hell away from any MMO I decide to play.

18.
 
No subject
Mar 25, 2006, 01:32
18.
No subject Mar 25, 2006, 01:32
Mar 25, 2006, 01:32
 
Koster was/is waaaaaayyyyyy over-rated

31.
 
No subject
Mar 15, 2006, 14:27
31.
No subject Mar 15, 2006, 14:27
Mar 15, 2006, 14:27
 
Any other game other than NWN, which has infintie replayability.

D&D Online is a SCAM!! They created an extremely limited sandbox which will require little or no management, where players are forced down repetitive paths like rats in a very dull maze.

14.
 
HIT!? MY AZZ!
Mar 14, 2006, 14:21
14.
HIT!? MY AZZ! Mar 14, 2006, 14:21
Mar 14, 2006, 14:21
 
Any game that announces add-ons or expansions literally days after initial release, is more likely doing so to refuel the media-hype machine so it continues working for them, because they see a rapid fall-off in new subscriptions.

D&D Online does not deserve subscription fees because NeverWinter Nights 2 will be a vastly superior alternative. In the end all you are doing in D&D Online is getting together with a small group of people and running pre-made modules which are no where near as complex, or compelling as those made possible by the NWN tools.

Furthermore, D&D Online does not allow for exploration or encounters outside of the canned little "adventures" (yawn). It is the ability to go-a-wandering, and get killed somewhere that no one can find you, which makes an MMO game "massive" in my book - not the number of idiots running around.

And finally, D&D Online is not an RPG.. because there is absolutely no reason to be "in-character". By that measure, a true MMORPG has yet to be made, but nevertheless, don't be sucked in by that non-existent aspect. All the people do in D&D Online is stand around in pubs pretending to attack eachother advertising their character type and level, or recruiting a type & level. Then it's back to the grind... YAY! (yawn).


34 Comments. 2 pages. Viewing page 1.
Newer [  1  2  ] Older