User information for Rilcon

Real Name
Rilcon
Nickname
Rilcon
Email
Concealed by request - Send Mail
Description
Homepage
None given.

Supporter
Silver – Founding
Duration
Since February 24, 2020

Signed On
December 2, 2005
Total Posts
661 (Apprentice)
User ID
24143
Search For:
Sort Results:
Ascending
Descending
Limit Results:
 
661 Comments. 34 pages. Viewing page 33.
Newer [  1    19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  ] Older
3.
 
Re: No subject
May 13, 2006, 11:27
Rilcon
 
3.
Re: No subject May 13, 2006, 11:27
May 13, 2006, 11:27
 Rilcon
 
It's various shades of green. Every once in a while it rains paper.

38.
 
Re: No subject
May 10, 2006, 03:40
Rilcon
 
38.
Re: No subject May 10, 2006, 03:40
May 10, 2006, 03:40
 Rilcon
 
The Q&A about UT2007 talked about two different versions of the game, one for PS3 and the other for PC. The Interview said nothing about interconnectivity between the two, or ones features (controller support) affecting the other.

As for this Live thing, given the state PC gaming is in today, I think it's a good thing. Now-a-days all we get are dozens of MMO and RTS games, sprinkled with a few FPS games. If this means that just a few publishers consider ports of their 360 games, it's a win in my eyes.

By the next generation, I'm guessing we'll get some sort of Microsoft Gaming Platform, where the same game disc will play on your brand new MS OS, or your MS console. When that happens, publishers might start to consider "old style" PC games without being afraid of the small market or the PCs compatibilty issues.

And since I don't have this odd visceral hate for MS, and I do make money developing games, I'm all for it.

4.
 
Re: No subject
May 9, 2006, 19:22
Rilcon
 
4.
Re: No subject May 9, 2006, 19:22
May 9, 2006, 19:22
 Rilcon
 
"The Zone" ?

Damn thing never worked for me, stupid DirectPlay needing thousands of ports, stupid router only letting me map 64, grr...

13.
 
Re: No subject
Apr 24, 2006, 17:40
Rilcon
 
13.
Re: No subject Apr 24, 2006, 17:40
Apr 24, 2006, 17:40
 Rilcon
 
Looks very interesting.

11.
 
Re: Homepage & demo
Apr 8, 2006, 10:58
Rilcon
 
11.
Re: Homepage & demo Apr 8, 2006, 10:58
Apr 8, 2006, 10:58
 Rilcon
 
I play more indie games than I do big name ones, so it's all good for me.

In regards to the game, I might get it if I like the artistic style, don't really like the ones with lot's of colors or weird organic looking ships.

4.
 
Re: Wow....
Mar 29, 2006, 13:13
Rilcon
 
4.
Re: Wow.... Mar 29, 2006, 13:13
Mar 29, 2006, 13:13
 Rilcon
 
This is why game designers shouldn't take drugs. Must've been one way out trip.

23.
 
Re: No subject
Mar 23, 2006, 03:59
Rilcon
 
23.
Re: No subject Mar 23, 2006, 03:59
Mar 23, 2006, 03:59
 Rilcon
 
You know you need a SLI system to get that GPU enhanced Havok physiscs, right? And that that GPU is going to be doing enough physiscs as to not notice much of an increment in graphics, as you would expect from a SLI system, right?

Soo, you'd rather pay $350 for a GPU that does physics, instead of $200 for a PPU that does physics?

7.
 
Re: No subject
Mar 22, 2006, 23:22
Rilcon
 
7.
Re: No subject Mar 22, 2006, 23:22
Mar 22, 2006, 23:22
 Rilcon
 
The most stupid part of the whole thing is that their's a rating for 17+ and another for 18+.

I'm sorry, but that's just so retarded it hurts.

Of course, I'm still amazed that the whole fuss is directed towards some rather lame sex scenes, and not towards the bloody massacres, but oh well.

19.
 
No subject
Mar 22, 2006, 20:25
Rilcon
 
19.
No subject Mar 22, 2006, 20:25
Mar 22, 2006, 20:25
 Rilcon
 
The video of Cell Factor on their vido site seemed rather nice.

http://physx.ageia.com/footage.html

I'll probably get one of the things whenever UT2007 or some really outstanding title comes out. Been a sucker for physics in games since a Space Wars clone on my C64.

27.
 
No subject
Mar 14, 2006, 08:36
Rilcon
 
27.
No subject Mar 14, 2006, 08:36
Mar 14, 2006, 08:36
 Rilcon
 
Yes folks, believe it ir not, russians used and still use green tracer rounds.

But god forbid such a thing interfere with making a funny post.

22.
 
No subject
Mar 13, 2006, 20:09
Rilcon
 
22.
No subject Mar 13, 2006, 20:09
Mar 13, 2006, 20:09
 Rilcon
 
The mod gave me more hours of fun than any retail game ever has, and the beta has assured me the full game will deliver even more.

9.
 
Cursed
Mar 13, 2006, 12:48
Rilcon
 
9.
Cursed Mar 13, 2006, 12:48
Mar 13, 2006, 12:48
 Rilcon
 
Digital Reality is a cursed studio, they such awesome games, only to have their publisher go under or give the IP to someone else.

At first glance it looks a bit like Soldiers, but with a better direct control. Which is good.

68.
 
Re: Gold
Mar 8, 2006, 14:54
Rilcon
 
68.
Re: Gold Mar 8, 2006, 14:54
Mar 8, 2006, 14:54
 Rilcon
 
Arrgg, go disinformation

First, a big hearty thanks to blues for saying "gold" when nothing was ever said about the game being gold. Good one there. The only information given at that time was about the release date, which, as any programmer knows, has nothing to do with when a product going gold.

OK, I'm in the beta, so I'll clear up a few things. 1 shot kills are the rule, for most any weapon. Only exceptions are grazing shots, or gettig hit on the end of you limbs. The damage indicator is new, a lot better, and tells you where exactley you've been hit.

The game is FUN. Some people might not like the idea of 1-shot-kills, but it's hella fun to advance through the map like one should, instead of ramboing arround. If you think it wouldn't work back in WW2, it probably won't work in RO.

Next thing... this is a new game, it has very little to do with the old mod. Mainly, the idea and setting behind the game. Everything else is different, even the maps that carried into the game have been seriously revamped.

Ending statement, if you're tired of arcade FPS, RO is for you. If you liked SWAT 4 or R6, you should try the demo when it comes out

21.
 
No subject
Mar 6, 2006, 02:17
Rilcon
 
21.
No subject Mar 6, 2006, 02:17
Mar 6, 2006, 02:17
 Rilcon
 
If it's only half as good as Soldiers, it'll be awesome.

3.
 
Re: No subject
Feb 28, 2006, 01:38
Rilcon
 
3.
Re: No subject Feb 28, 2006, 01:38
Feb 28, 2006, 01:38
 Rilcon
 
Sounds like a different one, don't remember any rescuing going on, a third evironment, or the stg44.

7.
 
No subject
Feb 24, 2006, 02:15
Rilcon
 
7.
No subject Feb 24, 2006, 02:15
Feb 24, 2006, 02:15
 Rilcon
 
SiN 1 was nice, and 2's art syle looks good, but the game play video kind of killed my expectation for it. Five minutes of shooting explosive barrels and watching some poor sods scream in agony for half a minute didn't correspond to my idea of fun. And that monster sequence at the end was quite unimpressive.

Probably a great run'n'gun arcade shooter, but I expected something different.

All IMO, of course.

20.
 
Re: Not the WWII game your looking for
Feb 19, 2006, 02:44
Rilcon
 
20.
Re: Not the WWII game your looking for Feb 19, 2006, 02:44
Feb 19, 2006, 02:44
 Rilcon
 
When I saw Red Orchestra turning into a full-fledged game, I almost cried in joy. My, the hours the mod sucked out of my life... I fear what horrors Ostfront will do to my non-gaming life.

Seriously, if you want a WW2 game where tactics and patience mean something, RO is for you. Plus it's way beyond fun.

Rilcon

29.
 
Re: No subject
Dec 19, 2005, 22:44
Rilcon
 
29.
Re: No subject Dec 19, 2005, 22:44
Dec 19, 2005, 22:44
 Rilcon
 
I remember a good many games back in the day that required a 3DFX card to run, back when Voodoo 1 cards were just being introduced. And man, that card was well worth it.

9.
 
Avoider
Dec 17, 2005, 10:50
Rilcon
 
9.
Avoider Dec 17, 2005, 10:50
Dec 17, 2005, 10:50
 Rilcon
 
lol, having no clue at all at what the game was about, my first reaction was a big old WTF!

2.
 
America at the dawn of color
Dec 13, 2005, 23:21
Rilcon
 
2.
America at the dawn of color Dec 13, 2005, 23:21
Dec 13, 2005, 23:21
 Rilcon
 
Those photos actually kind of freaked me out.

661 Comments. 34 pages. Viewing page 33.
Newer [  1    19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  ] Older