Xero wrote on May 9, 2018, 12:38:
Daayum, 970gtx is no longer a viable minimum spec. graphic card. Now I feel old. lol.

Damn you miners! I want my 1080ti already but I'm not paying more than it's already not worth!

MrBone wrote on Jan 3, 2018, 17:15:
PUBG wasn't the problem. The game was garbage.

Frijoles wrote on Oct 12, 2017, 23:43:
Jumped on. Can't find this new shit. Quit. These MMOs need to learn from WoW. When a player logs in to a new major update, fucking put something on the screen. I haven't played Warframe for several months. I can't remember anything. I don't know what's new and what I just haven't done.

Edit: Think I found it. It's a place (Cetus) on Earth.

Angrius Maximis wrote on Oct 13, 2017, 07:37:
Poor man's Destiny. Pass

aka_STEVE wrote on Aug 23, 2017, 08:36:
so,.. Free to play - but we are going to charge for every character , good gun, colors and possibly every new map that comes out that we can think of later ???

Kajetan wrote on Aug 22, 2017, 08:59:

Theo wrote on Aug 22, 2017, 08:29:
...

I do not have technical problems with UWP. I have a problem with the lack of choice:

You HAVE to use W10. Not because of technical reasons, but because MS wants to force everyone on W10.

You HAVE to use the W10 Store. Instead of other clients like Steam or uPlay or Origin or even DRM-free on GOG.

The lack of choice is what disappoints me. MS can keep their exclusives and they clearly do not need my money. I am irrelevant to them as paying customer. Which is fine. There are other ways. And other games of course

PacoTaco wrote on Aug 18, 2017, 04:56:
former ranked Quake 3 player, played id products since wolf 3d, halo was a pile of shit for console weenies that didn't know better. id took so long to ship doom3 that people already had better tech on the xbox those products made more money then doom3 did, now doom3 was a good single player game that could make you jump a few times but if you measure what happened with EA and Activision using the Quake 3 engine and what id did with their own code it a fucking joke how far they fell behind so fast when they were in first place they fell down and down. IW kicked ass, EA's MOH wrecked them, EA Bond AUF team wrecked them, all using Carmacks code. id failed to grow into a modern developer, they had very talented developers but no modern development methods, not enough bodies to generate content before the tech became passed by others in the case of Doom3. Trust me I know this all first hand.

Wash Washburne wrote on Aug 12, 2017, 10:45:
I'm glad that this game is still going strong, it's quite fascinating how it actually evolved from being a WoW clone that broke the subscription chains.

Creston wrote on Jul 28, 2017, 09:22:

our team has worked diligently to identify and correct issues that were not apparent with our testing and live phases

Your shitty multiplayer infrastructure was not apparent with your testing? Methinks you should rephrase that sentence to "correct issues that were not apparent with a cursory glance, as we did no testing whatsoever."

eRe4s3r wrote on Jul 28, 2017, 06:55:

Theo wrote on Jul 28, 2017, 06:22:

eRe4s3r wrote on Jul 28, 2017, 01:05:
The real problem of "for honor" is and remains the fact that I could be playing Mount and Blade instead.... and command armies, do quests, become king.

For Honor is like 10% of Mount and Blade, very polished, very smooth combat, but also very formulaic and stone-beats-paper style combat.. I didn't like it at all. The combat is basically a fancy quicktime event.

I dont get the comparison.

one of these games is a multiplayer object game with medieval combat. The other one is a single player action rpg type game with medival combat.

its like saying that Injustice is the same as Batman: Arkham Knight.

But even so I can easily compare the combat between the 2... 1v1 combat in Mount and Blade MP (a thing since Warband AFAIK) is pretty intense, and a lot less quicktime event feeling than For Honor.

eRe4s3r wrote on Jul 28, 2017, 01:05:
The real problem of "for honor" is and remains the fact that I could be playing Mount and Blade instead.... and command armies, do quests, become king.

For Honor is like 10% of Mount and Blade, very polished, very smooth combat, but also very formulaic and stone-beats-paper style combat.. I didn't like it at all. The combat is basically a fancy quicktime event.

Creston wrote on Jul 13, 2017, 14:39:

RedEye9 wrote on Jul 13, 2017, 13:03:
Intel is having a hissy fit.

This from a company that launched their Kaby Lake X series not with solder on the die, but with fucking thermal paste, so they could save... what, 40 cents per $1000 processor? Fuck Intel with a boiling hot glue gun.

deqer wrote on Jul 6, 2017, 13:02:
This game isn't even played. I think only roughly 500 people are playing this, right? Why double price, instead of cut in half.

Beamer wrote on May 19, 2017, 08:35:

Tried Anarki last night. I mean, I have like 40,000 favor, but the whole renting for 24 hours thing really bothers me. Were it "rent for 60 in-game minutes" or "5 matches" I'd be down with it, but 24 hours feels like I need to be around to play to get value. Which may be what they want, but for me personally, rather than incentivize me to play more it incentivizes me to rent less. I don't want to feel like not playing one more match means I'm missing out on something.

Also, I hated Anarki. Not being able to open an empty map to get a feel for the character you just rented is dumb.

Sepharo wrote on May 19, 2017, 03:54:
Oh that's super weird, I played in the one two weeks ago and now this one. Never had to rent or unlock though I understand that's how the final game will be.

I started off playing only Slash but the wide health differences between her and the heavies was pretty annoying and un-quake like. Now I'm playing Visor to essentially have the same speed but with a little more health and armor.