Wait a minute. What was your brilliant response again?
My response was that you don't understand. I did say sorry, too, because you typed out a big long paragraph and the "sorry" was because you wasted all that time.
edit: Ok, I'll actually explain what's wrong:
So I point out that they knew that what they were doing was wrong AT THE TIME, therefore "hindsight" aint got shit to do with it,
Who's hindsight do you think I'm talking about? Ok, so President Bush knew everything when he made whatever decisions he made. What the hell does that have anything to do with what I said? You think I was talking about President Bush's hindsight? That doesn't make any sense! You are clueless as to what I meant (fine, I'll concede that it's because my post was vague), so I performed the following steps when I read your response:
1) I opened your posting history.
2) I determined that you weren't anyone I wanted to sustain a conversation with.
3) I posted a terse reply because I don't have time nor inclination to explain something to a nobody on the internet with whom I don't even want to be having a conversation!
Now I'm replying to this because it's just silly that you make a point that has nothing to do with what I meant (hey, I'll even take the blame and say that I should have posted more than a 1-liner) and think that you're some kind of bad ass. Completely rediculous.This comment was edited on Jul 3, 02:35.