Did you even look at the links you cited? That's what the hell I'm talking about. If you want to embarass yourself with such stupidity, by all means continue. It's amusing, but sad.
Uhh, hello? No, I didn't look at all the links I cited--I just looked at their google summary. How can I make this any more clear? Conservatives are using this issue to mudsling Edwards, so of course
the first links on google are going to be right wing. Do you think you're being brilliant here or something? They all cite the original New York Times article, however, but I'm not going to be anyone's personal research assistant when the whole point of my post was that all it took was 2 seconds using google to find out what Josh was talking about.
Let me repeat this so that even your thick skull can understand: Someone dismissed what Josh said without even doing a simple search, so I did a simple search to show them that it was easy to do, and that the article originated from the New York Times. Wow, I sure started a controversy.
By the way, to others reading this horrendously pointless exchange, the original person who posted that "do you have proof? no" comment has demonstrated in the past that he has very strong technical knowledge, and I thought it was unfortunate and somewhat out of character (i.e., clouded by politics) that he didn't make an attempt to find a source before posting that comment. That was my motivation for the original post, if you were wondering.This comment was edited on Jul 30, 19:25.