MeanJim wrote on May 6, 2018, 04:32:
Cyber cafes are still a thing?

Timmeh wrote on Apr 27, 2018, 14:22:
Our government is overrun with commie leftist bastards who will do anything to destroy america as we know it.

dsmart wrote on Apr 24, 2018, 16:47:
I have said this for THREE YEARS now that not only are backers not going to see a dime in refund, let alone a game of any kind

afka Rossini wrote on Apr 4, 2018, 12:33:
Make Half-Life 3 a SteamOS exclusive. Problem solved.

Bard wrote on Apr 2, 2018, 14:14:
Facebook.

It is silencing activism against the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians.

An example of the things Companies should not have the ability to do.

jdreyer wrote on Mar 31, 2018, 18:53:
Sooo...
Does this Star Citizen update run faster than 5 frames per second? Dare I download 50 GB to find out?

eRe4s3r wrote on Mar 16, 2018, 23:15:
Why the hell do I need a yahoo account to see the full view of screenshots on a playstation blog, that's some fucked up shit right there.

Slick wrote on Mar 16, 2018, 19:47:
I'm more concerned about the fact that they're already advertising the Season Pass content BEFORE THE GAME HAS LAUNCHED.

How is this not a big deal to people? They're openly telling people who haven't even played the game yet that to experience everything they have to plonk down another $50.

Mashiki Amiketo wrote on Feb 25, 2018, 20:57:
So which is it? He's a dictator for supporting gun rights? Or he's a dictator because progressives want him to take guns and he's refusing.

Cutter wrote on Feb 16, 2018, 20:55:

As the budget grew, we began a long series of conversations with potential publishing partners.

So they thought they could pull a Chris Roberts here. Jesus Christ, this isn't rocket surgery.

MrGrosser wrote on Feb 6, 2018, 11:38:
It doesn't allow you to see through walls.. or if it did.. I didn't know how to configure that. For me, I used it to change vibrancy to brighten it up and make players stand out more... still didn't give me an advantage.

Beamer wrote on Feb 4, 2018, 10:44:
She was 15. She did not consent because she was too young. If you disagree, where do you personally draw the line?

panbient wrote on Feb 4, 2018, 05:51:
Holy crap the victim blaming...


There's a pretty simple way to avoid these kind of situations. If you think you need to ask a young woman her age (or proof thereof) then SHE'S TOO YOUNG. Even if she turns out to be "legal".

But when you're looking to pay through a Sugar Daddy / Sugar Baby website for a hookup there are probably other issues going on (with the john). Rather than looking into her background (wtf? blame the victim more). Look into the fact that he was a middle aged man looking to push the edge of the envelope and obviously didn't care about her real age so long as she told him it was ok.

It might not be clinical pedophilia but it was certainly some form of exploitation.

If anything this is another example of why prostitution should be legalized and controlled - for the health and benefit of both parties.

CJ_Parker wrote on Feb 3, 2018, 12:58:
Yeah, including fucking FC3 in their season pass is like a creative declaration of bankruptcy.

I'm generally about as anti-season pass as it gets but if you gotta have a season pass then why not, you know, expand on the game it is related to? What a concept!

Dacron wrote on Jan 31, 2018, 18:24:
You're busy trying to convince me CIG has a case. I DON'T CARE.

Kosumo wrote on Jan 31, 2018, 18:45:
What prof do you have that either the lawsuit was in bad faith (Chris Roberts breaking a contract, like he has in the past is bad faith) or that Crytek is in a dire financial position?

Kosumo wrote on Jan 31, 2018, 18:45:
You have that wrong, the GLA states no such thing, you are seeing it that way so as to defend your view that the lawsuit is fibolous (not good).

The GLA state that CIG should include the CryEngine and Crytek trademarks due to the fact that the contract is for CIG to use the CryEngine EXCUSIVLY .... which CIG as now broken by switching engines. There was never going to be a time where Crytek was hoping to have there logos displayed on an engine that was not theirs as that was never going to happen under the GLA.

It's not a sensible interpretation and is not the way that the contract will be interpreted - it's just the way that Chris Roberts cultist are trying to view it to stop their little minds from going snap.

Kosumo wrote on Jan 31, 2018, 18:45:
I believe that Chris Roberts has set up over 17 diffident companies as part of this games development, and that all of them, due to the same company directors and same business operations will be found to be in effect, one and the same.

If RSI is diffirent than CIG, how has it had the right to be disrupting the game client (the pre-alpha tech demo) without a deal with Crytek since it has included the CryEngine?

Kosumo wrote on Jan 31, 2018, 18:45:

theyarecomingforyou wrote on Jan 31, 2018, 16:27:
You believe that Crytek can claim copyright infringement for its engine when the copyright was only filed a year after CIG had changed engines?

I'm not sure about what this point is about, so will offer nothing on it. I would not thinks so though.

Kosumo wrote on Jan 31, 2018, 18:45:
You are viewing that as though in the contract they where to separate products, which, at the time of the contract, they where both included in the same purchese of SQ42/Star Citizen - CIG as since made them into two separate games - you can buy only one or the other which is diffent than what was laid out in the GLA where they where both only to be sold togeather.

Do you not understand it that way? It says "and" not "or".

Kosumo wrote on Jan 31, 2018, 18:45:
This is the real meat of the whole lawsuit don't you agree?

I do believe that Crytek had the understanding that CIG would make the game using ONLY the CryEngine and this is why Crytek gave CIG a very cheap fee to use it and also why they (Crytek done this, not Chris Roberts) made the original demos and promotional video for Chris Roberts.