User information for Nix

Real Name
Nix
Nickname
Nix
Description
Homepage
Signed On
October 3, 2004
Supporter
-
Total Posts
56 (Suspect)
User ID
21961
Search For:
Sort Results:
Ascending
Descending
Limit Results:
 
56 Comments. 3 pages. Viewing page 1.
Newer [  1  2  3  ] Older
7.
 
Re: Wow...
Dec 2, 2004, 11:23
Nix
7.
Re: Wow... Dec 2, 2004, 11:23
Dec 2, 2004, 11:23
Nix
 
Because WoW did nothing new to any game and their are still developers out there that actually dare to try something different?

Though I have no idea about this game and it'll probably fail, I just had to actually say that WoW did nothing new and is by far not the greatest game ever.

Look kiddies, art direction is nice, but get over it, it doesn't make a perfect game that we played 5 years ago with EverQuest.


No one said the game is perfect, but it is EASILY the absolute best mmorpg available and I see nothing announced which will top it. You're either not an MMORPG fan or just not smart.

Within its first day of release, World of Warcraft sold more than 240,000 copies -- the highest day-one total in PC game history.

1.
 
Wow...
Dec 1, 2004, 15:45
Nix
1.
Wow... Dec 1, 2004, 15:45
Dec 1, 2004, 15:45
Nix
 
With World of Warcraft now released, why would any company continue to develop an MMORPG?

1.
 
I hope they stop before...
Nov 30, 2004, 13:32
Nix
1.
I hope they stop before... Nov 30, 2004, 13:32
Nov 30, 2004, 13:32
Nix
 
...they reach 6. Otherwise "Rainbox Six 6" will sound a little silly.

9.
 
Re: Shipping Delay
Nov 21, 2004, 14:17
Nix
9.
Re: Shipping Delay Nov 21, 2004, 14:17
Nov 21, 2004, 14:17
Nix
 
Oh No! If the game takes too long to reach me, there's a good chance the graphics will end up looking dated

Poor guy needs a new video card.

7.
 
Re: It's spelt Purolator. :)
Nov 21, 2004, 14:15
Nix
7.
Re: It's spelt Purolator. :) Nov 21, 2004, 14:15
Nov 21, 2004, 14:15
Nix
 
I need WoW. Thank god I don't live in Canada or I'd have to move out of that country because of this. :\

37.
 
Re: No subject
Nov 13, 2004, 21:17
Nix
37.
Re: No subject Nov 13, 2004, 21:17
Nov 13, 2004, 21:17
Nix
 
Vivendi is a piece of shit company.

124.
 
Re: Guess what?
Nov 10, 2004, 22:12
Nix
Re: Guess what? Nov 10, 2004, 22:12
Nov 10, 2004, 22:12
Nix
 
I think you will find that the Warriors that are complaining are not mid-level.

Hi Bronco:

Like you said, the players just need to adapt. All warriors can still tank, they just need to change playstyle a bit.

The paladin was the same way... So many people were complaining that they're broken, but after they learn how to play, they love the new changes.

Who knows why the sweeping changes came so late, but they did... It's still a very fun game.

I wonder if they'll let our OB chars carry over... more than likely not, but it'd be kinda nice...

113.
 
Re: Guess what?
Nov 9, 2004, 21:18
Nix
Re: Guess what? Nov 9, 2004, 21:18
Nov 9, 2004, 21:18
Nix
 
"Change" hah. Tell that to all the warriors who can't tank anymore. What's their purpose now?

Warriors can tank fine. I have a mid-level warrior and warriors just need to adapt to the new play style.

The game will be patched constantly, don't be a fucking moron.

104.
 
Re: No subject
Nov 9, 2004, 11:29
Nix
Re: No subject Nov 9, 2004, 11:29
Nov 9, 2004, 11:29
Nix
 
Let me shut this chump up once and for all, how come im playing for like several hours and no one is even griefing?
How come I and everyone else who IS playing is enjoying the new combat system?


Maybe this is because you are the only one actually playing EQ2?

98.
 
Re: Guess what?
Nov 9, 2004, 08:33
Nix
98.
Re: Guess what? Nov 9, 2004, 08:33
Nov 9, 2004, 08:33
Nix
 
#90:

You speak about Guild Wars as if your opinion was fact. I hardly think that 400,000 people would have logged in during the last WPE to play a boring game. Personally i find fun in both games, they're different but enjoyable. I also think that GW was more complete in many aspects even during its E3 alpha phase than WoW is now --- although GW doesn't classify as a normal MMORPG... anyway, i'll be buying both. I admit i'm looking forward to GW more, but that's because the mission-based style appeals greatly to me. Exploring in WoW i generally find more fun than in GW.


Yes, you are completely right. I was sharing my opinion. Isn't that what we are doing here?

Sorry, build Guild Wars seemed too simple for me. WoW is designed to be simple, but still has more depth than GW.

And you can't judge the game by 400,000 who joined a "world event". It's unfair.

Not all of those 400,000 people who tried it actually liked it. Hell, some probably didn't even know what they were trying.

Don't get me wrong, GW was surprisingly stable and ran fairly well but it is just not fun (IMHO(pinion)) (=

90.
 
Re: Guess what?
Nov 9, 2004, 00:29
Nix
90.
Re: Guess what? Nov 9, 2004, 00:29
Nov 9, 2004, 00:29
Nix
 
Who cares if the game is gold? There's a patcher. There will be at least one more patch before Nov 23 and, obviously, constant patches after release.

This MMORPG is more complete at its release than just about any other out there.

Guild wars was beyond boring and lacked a key element: fun.

It's funny that you're one of those kids who scream "nerf" when Blizzard implements a "change".

But what do you care, you won't be playing anyway. (yea, right.)

56.
 
Re: Fileplanet....
Nov 8, 2004, 19:52
Nix
56.
Re: Fileplanet.... Nov 8, 2004, 19:52
Nov 8, 2004, 19:52
Nix
 
Patience. You should be able to make an account on worldofwarcraft.com once the technical difficulties are solved.

This is straight from Blizzard.

49.
 
Re: FP
Nov 8, 2004, 19:25
Nix
49.
Re: FP Nov 8, 2004, 19:25
Nov 8, 2004, 19:25
Nix
 
worldofwarcraft.com is currently being hammered into oblivion as we speak. I really hope I get to try this otherwise I don't think I will buy the game without knowing what it is like.

Go and have yourself an orgasm. That is what it is like.

43.
 
Re: No subject
Nov 8, 2004, 18:52
Nix
43.
Re: No subject Nov 8, 2004, 18:52
Nov 8, 2004, 18:52
Nix
 
...is actually what it says there on Battle.net. And Fileplanet now says you can still get in via WorldOfWarcraft.com, complete with link. Which is down at the moment, but that doesn't make him a dolt.

Errr... he said he remembers those "idiots" saying this will be a real open beta... if he doesn't want to be insulted, maybe he shouldn't insult others...

34.
 
Re: No subject
Nov 8, 2004, 18:14
Nix
34.
Re: No subject Nov 8, 2004, 18:14
Nov 8, 2004, 18:14
Nix
 
AN OPEN BETA IS AVAILABLE TO ANYONE AND EVERYONE... anything else is a CLOSED BETA

Dear dolt,

The beta is not closed. Access to the beta through fileplanet is closed. Be patient and you'll get in via http://www.worldofwarcraft.com.

Sincerely,
Notadolt

37.
 
Re: 80s
Nov 5, 2004, 12:13
Nix
37.
Re: 80s Nov 5, 2004, 12:13
Nov 5, 2004, 12:13
Nix
 
Cheese has no clue what he's talking about.

I think the best statement in this thread is "Graphically EQ2 is better, visually WoW just owns EQ2."

EQ2 might exercise more features of modern day graphics cards, but that isn't always smart.

And, it's not even THAT much better.

Here's a good screenshot of WoW:

http://www.worldofwarcraft.com/screenshots/images/insider/020/interview/ss014.jpg

19.
 
Re: DING!
Nov 4, 2004, 22:59
Nix
19.
Re: DING! Nov 4, 2004, 22:59
Nov 4, 2004, 22:59
Nix
 
WoW is a game where people will have fun, level to 60, and then move on and be done with it. It's a fun game, but the lasting appeal just isn't there.

No, the Wow BETA is a game where people have fun, level to 60, and then move on and be done with it.

Blizzard realizes it will not take people long to reach 60 and are adding plenty of content to keep people interested in the game after you reach the top level.

54.
 
Re: Early Christmas Present for Me
Nov 2, 2004, 12:59
Nix
54.
Re: Early Christmas Present for Me Nov 2, 2004, 12:59
Nov 2, 2004, 12:59
Nix
 
A patcher that is newer than the one used for the last push? Does it use the same method to acquire the data?

I don't know for sure if the new patcher uses the same method, but I seriously doubt it does. It downloaded for me in about 4 seconds. I wasn't around for last push as I was never in closed beta so I'm only assuming this patcher is new.

I guess this means the BT experiment is over?

I dunno. Quite possibly.

49.
 
Re: Early Christmas Present for Me
Nov 2, 2004, 11:44
Nix
49.
Re: Early Christmas Present for Me Nov 2, 2004, 11:44
Nov 2, 2004, 11:44
Nix
 
Hey guys, if I download this, will I have to download the OB all over again? since my current conn count all MB's and I have to pay for them

I seriously doubt you will have to download again to enter open beta...

47.
 
Re: Early Christmas Present for Me
Nov 2, 2004, 09:55
Nix
47.
Re: Early Christmas Present for Me Nov 2, 2004, 09:55
Nov 2, 2004, 09:55
Nix
 
Bronco:

You misunderstood me. There's a new PATCHER. You still need to download the game via blizzards downloader or fileplanet, but patches will no longer be distributed through the blizzard downloader.

So at retail, barely anyone will have these download woes.

56 Comments. 3 pages. Viewing page 1.
Newer [  1  2  3  ] Older