User information for Justin

Real Name
Justin
Nickname
Cabezone
Email
Concealed by request - Send Mail
Description
Homepage
Signed On
February 3, 2004
Supporter
-
Total Posts
1091 (Pro)
User ID
20076
Search For:
Sort Results:
Ascending
Descending
Limit Results:
 
1091 Comments. 55 pages. Viewing page 1.
Newer [  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16    55  ] Older
2.
 
Re: Evening Tech Bits
Mar 2, 2016, 23:22
2.
Re: Evening Tech Bits Mar 2, 2016, 23:22
Mar 2, 2016, 23:22
 
That number doesn't include SSD...which seems like it makes those numbers meaningless except to people who own HDD factories.
"Pants! Pants! Pants!"
13.
 
Re: Mass Effect Andromeda Delayed
Mar 2, 2016, 11:59
13.
Re: Mass Effect Andromeda Delayed Mar 2, 2016, 11:59
Mar 2, 2016, 11:59
 
The shit ending of 3 doesn't change the fact that for 99.9% of the trilogy it was telling great stories. It did suck all the wind out of me wanting to play again but I'm not much on replaying games anyway. The entire 3rd game was wrapping up the stories and it did them all incredibly well. I do get why it's what people remember most tho.

If the last bite of pie has poo in it, you ain't gonna remember how awesome the rest was.
"Pants! Pants! Pants!"
3.
 
Re: Into the Black
Feb 18, 2016, 22:10
3.
Re: Into the Black Feb 18, 2016, 22:10
Feb 18, 2016, 22:10
 
That's not the actual use for that portion of the chopsticks, it's just where they are clamped when getting milled.
"Pants! Pants! Pants!"
28.
 
Re: PC Rise of the Tomb Raider Rises
Jan 28, 2016, 18:05
28.
Re: PC Rise of the Tomb Raider Rises Jan 28, 2016, 18:05
Jan 28, 2016, 18:05
 
I tested it at 1080 and very high pegs my card at max VRAM usage, 4gb with stutter, high drops it to 3gb.

I dunno what those sites were doing to get such low VRAM usage.

This comment was edited on Jan 28, 2016, 18:18.
"Pants! Pants! Pants!"
24.
 
Re: PC Rise of the Tomb Raider Rises
Jan 28, 2016, 17:08
24.
Re: PC Rise of the Tomb Raider Rises Jan 28, 2016, 17:08
Jan 28, 2016, 17:08
 
A quick FYI, very high textures requires 6gb vram.
"Pants! Pants! Pants!"
19.
 
Re: PC Rise of the Tomb Raider Rises
Jan 28, 2016, 15:34
19.
Re: PC Rise of the Tomb Raider Rises Jan 28, 2016, 15:34
Jan 28, 2016, 15:34
 
This is the best Tomb Raider yet. They left in the annoying QTEs but this time the buttons are not random, they always make sense for what the button does outside of the events.

It's also an excellent port, it runs great and has all the graphics options I want to be able to mess with.

Well worth the 40 bucks I payed on G2A.
"Pants! Pants! Pants!"
9.
 
Re: Into the Black
Jan 27, 2016, 23:47
9.
Re: Into the Black Jan 27, 2016, 23:47
Jan 27, 2016, 23:47
 
Bodolza wrote on Jan 27, 2016, 15:27:
Cabezone wrote on Jan 27, 2016, 04:55:
It was not. Everything the actors handled and used was a real prop.
Everything? JJ had working lightsabers?

"Pants! Pants! Pants!"
5.
 
Re: Into the Black
Jan 27, 2016, 04:55
5.
Re: Into the Black Jan 27, 2016, 04:55
Jan 27, 2016, 04:55
 
DangerDog wrote on Jan 26, 2016, 21:56:
No big surprise that all that talk about using "practical models" was complete B.S.

It was not. Everything the actors handled and used was a real prop. They didnt' mean they would be using claymation instead of computer special effects.

http://petapixel.com/assets/uploads/2015/12/lightsabergreenscreen.jpg

This bullshit never happens. A bunch of people waving their swords around pretending to fight something not there.

http://www.adorama.com/alc/sites/default/files/uploads/Force-Awakens.jpg

This stuff did happen. They almost never shot outside of a studio in the prequels. I think only tatooine on episode 1 had any significant real life outdoor shots, episode 3 had zero.

This comment was edited on Jan 27, 2016, 05:01.
"Pants! Pants! Pants!"
11.
 
Re: Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen Released
Jan 17, 2016, 11:45
11.
Re: Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen Released Jan 17, 2016, 11:45
Jan 17, 2016, 11:45
 
The game is complicated and has a steep learning curve, but since it's 4 years old the wiki is completely filled out.

This comment was edited on Jan 17, 2016, 22:49.
"Pants! Pants! Pants!"
2.
 
Re: Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen Released
Jan 15, 2016, 21:25
2.
Re: Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen Released Jan 15, 2016, 21:25
Jan 15, 2016, 21:25
 
This is a pretty good port.
"Pants! Pants! Pants!"
1.
 
Re: The Division Beta This Month
Jan 15, 2016, 12:27
1.
Re: The Division Beta This Month Jan 15, 2016, 12:27
Jan 15, 2016, 12:27
 
That's not a beta that's a demo of the release candidate.
"Pants! Pants! Pants!"
23.
 
Re: Amazon Prime Discounting Game Preorders
Jan 13, 2016, 04:56
23.
Re: Amazon Prime Discounting Game Preorders Jan 13, 2016, 04:56
Jan 13, 2016, 04:56
 
Kajetan wrote on Jan 13, 2016, 03:42:
But isnt pre-ordering bad? Dont pre-order! Angel

Dont listen to him. Pre-order is great!! 20% off great!! Devil

You don't have to pre order, the discount lasts until 2 weeks after release.
"Pants! Pants! Pants!"
21.
 
Re: Amazon Prime Discounting Game Preorders
Jan 13, 2016, 03:21
21.
Re: Amazon Prime Discounting Game Preorders Jan 13, 2016, 03:21
Jan 13, 2016, 03:21
 
Jerykk wrote on Jan 12, 2016, 23:20:
Cabezone wrote on Jan 12, 2016, 23:18:
You can't just compare this to the 100 dollar price of prime vs other game discounts. It's just part of the prime package.

If you only care about discounts, then Prime is a bad deal. Paying for discounts is always a bad deal. Now, if you're interested in streaming a limited selection of music, movies and TV shows, Prime might be more worthwhile and the discounts would just be a bonus.

I agree, purchasing a hamburger is a bad way to get cheese.

This comment was edited on Jan 13, 2016, 04:57.
"Pants! Pants! Pants!"
13.
 
Re: Amazon Prime Discounting Game Preorders
Jan 12, 2016, 23:18
13.
Re: Amazon Prime Discounting Game Preorders Jan 12, 2016, 23:18
Jan 12, 2016, 23:18
 
You can't just compare this to the 100 dollar price of prime vs other game discounts. It's just part of the prime package.
"Pants! Pants! Pants!"
38.
 
Re: Out of the Blue
Dec 19, 2015, 05:05
38.
Re: Out of the Blue Dec 19, 2015, 05:05
Dec 19, 2015, 05:05
 
jdreyer wrote on Dec 19, 2015, 03:49:
1badmf wrote on Dec 19, 2015, 01:31:
Lots of stuff

Plan on seeing it soon, but a few questions.

So you're saying they should have bagged an Hamill, Fisher, & Ford and just run with an all new cast? That was my original contention. It will be interesting to see how they're integrated.

Also, you weren't impressed by the music? Isn't the music from this mashup from The Force Awakens? It gave me chills.

Plot holes, unfortunately, are a hallmark of Abrams movies. Hope they're not Prometheus or Into Darkness level ruinous.

As for too much homage to the original, this is why I despised Jurassic world earlier this year. Hopefully it's not too bad.

Remember, Disney bought this franchise from a desire to do good. But through them it wields a power too great and terrible to imagine...

Oh, wait. Wrong franchise reference. Never mind.

I enjoyed the film but I'm a fan of Abram's movies, Star Trek 09 is one of my favorite movies. This movie isn't as good as that one but it's pretty good. If you're an Abrams hater, yeah he made this movie in his style, so there won't be any pleasing you.

It's essentially a retelling of A New Hope. I like it in spite of that but it's a real mark against it in my book. However, I've always been a character over story guy and this has great characters.

The music in that trailer is mostly rehashed original scores. Williams hasn't produced anything memorable since the 90's and it's no different here. The only good parts of the score are when he's remixing his old stuff. It's not a bad score, like most Zimmer crap, it's just not memorable.

I like the originals but don't consider them great like so many fans do.
"Pants! Pants! Pants!"
25.
 
Re: Out of the Blue
Dec 18, 2015, 19:01
25.
Re: Out of the Blue Dec 18, 2015, 19:01
Dec 18, 2015, 19:01
 
I love how Cutter thought we didn't understand his point and tried to explain himself.
"Pants! Pants! Pants!"
5.
 
Re: Into the Black
Dec 16, 2015, 20:24
5.
Re: Into the Black Dec 16, 2015, 20:24
Dec 16, 2015, 20:24
 
jdreyer wrote on Dec 16, 2015, 19:26:
Cutter wrote on Dec 16, 2015, 17:16:
I'd be much more interested to see who could kill him first to prevent him from ever making anymore movies.
Who would be you preferred director for Star Wars? Just curious.

I hated Into Darkness but I think that was less his direction and more the script. I'd love to see a Star Wars movie directed by Rian Johnson or Alphonse Cuaron.

You know Rian Johnson is signed on to direct 8 yes?
"Pants! Pants! Pants!"
19.
 
Re: Into the Black
Dec 10, 2015, 01:58
19.
Re: Into the Black Dec 10, 2015, 01:58
Dec 10, 2015, 01:58
 
Simon Says wrote on Dec 9, 2015, 12:24:
Meanwhile, the US military budget still gobbles up half of the entire federal budget ( probably a LOT more if you include the black projects ).

Why do people say this? It's usually between 15-20% of the budget. Discretionary spending is only some of the Federal budget.
"Pants! Pants! Pants!"
12.
 
Re: Into the Black
Dec 9, 2015, 08:30
12.
Re: Into the Black Dec 9, 2015, 08:30
Dec 9, 2015, 08:30
 
edit:NM
"Pants! Pants! Pants!"
10.
 
Re: Into the Black
Dec 9, 2015, 04:46
10.
Re: Into the Black Dec 9, 2015, 04:46
Dec 9, 2015, 04:46
 
Creston wrote on Dec 8, 2015, 23:50:
This is that same fucking piece of shit that literally DISSOLVES IN SALT WATER

We bitch a lot at the F-35 fiasco, deservedly, but what the Navy is doing is 100% as retarded. Littoral combat ships that have little to no shred of self defense, concurrency shit on our carriers which has caused us to be short on carriers, etc.

You'd think there'd be SOMEONE with half a brain cell in the military SOMEWHERE?

That's why you prototype equipment, to find flaws. The cathodic protection was not installed for some reason. It's an easy fix. That editorial you linked is from some jackass who couldn't spend a few minutes researching this type of corrosion.
"Pants! Pants! Pants!"
1091 Comments. 55 pages. Viewing page 1.
Newer [  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16    55  ] Older