WTF kind of crazy nutbag honeypot place has blues become? Are you people certifiably insane? Defending Derek Smart? WTF? Are you not aware that he's the biggest joke in the gaming industry? Basically the Uwe Boll of gaming except even Uwe actually finished some projects.

Comparing him to Chris Roberts? Chris' least critically acclaimed game was still a 100x more complete and well received than anything Derek produced.

Have you not seen this letter where Derek got owned to hell and back due to his bullshit attempt to gather press for another of his failed projects by dissing on SC?
Owned

Seriously, you people are beyond idiots if you think of derek smart in any kind of positive way.

Ugh, again with Blue posting this SJW propaganda bullshit? Is he not aware of what a lying, thieving, morally bankrupt person this bitch is?

I'm done with BluesNews.. time to find another site that doesn't propagate this drivel.

Krovven wrote on Mar 10, 2015, 12:41:

Bosanac wrote on Mar 10, 2015, 12:36:
Nothing they say should ever be given any amount of credit or thought towards.

Just like your post and the majority of user comments here.

So with you two idiots thinking you are too cool...what exactly is wrong about the article? Nothing. Everything is correct.

Grow the fuck up.

Lol @ internet tough guy. Nice to resort to insults immediatelly. Did I insult your favorite little white knighting SJW site? Ohh poor baby. Blow me.

Wallshadows wrote on Mar 10, 2015, 11:27:
I'd rather be wrong about a Kotaku article than give them any sort of traffic though.

I really wish Blue would stop linking to those clickbait idiots that belong to gawker. Nothing they say should ever be given any amount of credit or thought towards.

They only need 10k to be successful. They have 40% more. Dedicated fans who, at a minimum, will support it for a year. Not counting those who will flock to it if its great.

Your negative predictions are wrong.

Ant wrote on Apr 27, 2013, 18:21:

dj LiTh wrote on Apr 27, 2013, 18:15:

Julio wrote on Apr 27, 2013, 18:00:
I'm going to pass, MMORPG no thanks.

I hear ya, i just dont have the time anymore (who does?). Let alone the longing to grind up 50+ levels just to try pvp/rvr

Same here. Even don't have time for quick Flash games these days!

See, this is what happens when people make up their opinions and judge things without knowing anything about it. There is no PvE. You don't level to get to it, you start it right away.

And some idiot after you two yaps about how there's no content update to justify monthly fees because its RvR and he wants his pve raids. I mean really? There' no way to improve an RvR game over time? Add new objectives, mechanics, abilities to the raw engine. You can already build your own keeps.. did minecraft not have any reason for updates because it had no PvE raids?

Come on people. Grow the fuck up.

Okay. what do you have about me to try and discredit me? I've already said that GW2 is a pale shadow of DAoC. Let's hear your GW2 fanboyism.

Man, there sure are a lot of angry nerds here.

Yes DAoC is that beloved. Yes many still consider DAoC to be the best PvP MMO. No, GW2 doesn't have a 'hold' on 3 realm RvR. Its a half assed, poorly executed, no metagame ripoff of DAoC. They overpromised and under delivered on that. And they focus too much on PvE and making it a gear grindfest to dedicate the proper time to a PvP end game.

EA sweet talks a lot of people with money. He learned his lesson there. Games Workshop is probably in the top 3 biggest POS companies in gaming and their deadline and lack of any understanding of MMO's forced Mythic to release WAR over a year before they wanted to.

Not had any issues with Workshop either. Like the integration better though download speeds seem pitiful, but that only comes into play on really big mods.

But Nexus has more mods since it has bigger file allowance. And yeah it's ugly, but also more customizable so I guess you can't have both?

So each has it's pluses and minuses. Let's not get into a stupid war over which is better.

Instead use this to share your opinion of the DLC, what cool things you've found, etc.

OH YOUR GOD

OHH YOUURRR GOODDDD

OH YOUR GOD OH YOUR GOD OH YOUR GOD OH YOUR GOD OH YOUR GOD OH YOUR GOD OH YOUR GOD OH YOUR GOD OH YOUR GOD OH YOUR GOD OH YOUR GOD OH YOUR GOD

I CAME!

This'll be a day 1 download for sure

Okay well never going to read the Examiner again. Read that review on te Phoenix.

"Although the Intel i7 3770 quad core is arguably a bit of overkill (there are very few if any games that can take advantage of even a dual core CPU)"

uhh... IF ANY? a dual core? Are you fucking brain dead?

Really fun game. Love it on my iphone. Can't wait for the new DLC and all it brings. Will be fun on windows too.

You are an idiot beyond measure Axis.

I don't get it.. Blizzard is a cash cow.. COD is a cash cow. Why call it liability?

I don't get this game. Why is everyone so excited about it?

Is it turn based?

I haven't gotten to any monsters, mostly because I can't figure out how the mage works with his spells.

If its real time, how do I command 4 characters to do something without it being turn based?

I'm so very confused about this game.

Irregardless is not a word. I hate you.

Alamar wrote on Feb 16, 2012, 20:45:
Irregardless of all the 'cashing in on the kick starter hype', this could be the week the world of PC gaming takes a huge turn...

On the one hand, I won't support big companies like DF/etc, because I think it's wasted dollars that would be better off helping 'start ups', but on the other, a few great successes can make this a feasible alternative, and hopefully come up with some neat new genres, or additions to. And who better to pay for classics updating than a bunch of cranky BluesNewsian curmudgeons : )

I am highly doubtful this will turn out to be a grand success; big (and little) devs will continue to go over budget, and in this case, no one will be around to extend times available or bail them out. I know a lot of people feel that's no different than the publisher backed model, but I do : )

-Alamar

xXBatmanXx wrote on Dec 19, 2011, 14:33:

Fibrocyte wrote on Dec 19, 2011, 13:20:

xXBatmanXx wrote on Dec 19, 2011, 10:39:
What you see is what you are going to get.....

Would you cite your reference, please?

Their sales figures.

Bookmark this page.

BF3 is an extension of BFBC2 - and it sold huge. Why would they change?

So earlier you bitch that you won't be buying anymore BF because their direction is consoles and now that BF3 is just an extension of BFBC2

And you play Modern Warfare 3.

Are you really that fucking stupid?

Joy. So DX9 graphics in 2013 with a plot where the bad guys are actually right. I definitely want to play this

$15? Suck my dick. I'm pirating your shit you greedy cock mongers.