So what now were comparing BF192 to HL2?
Putting aside the fact that Battlefield 1942 is about 3 years old now. Which in the PC game world is quite alot.
CS:Source does one thing really well, in a confined area.
Battlefield 1942 does a number of things well, in a expansive area.
And the things you gripe about, more then likely are going to be resolved in Battlefield 2; the only battlefield game that would make an ounce of sence to compare to CS:source.
Ok, let's put aside the comparison to CS:Source then. BF1942 still feels like you're playing two feet of mud, still has skipping animations and still take 15 minutes to get to the menu after hitting ESC. Saying the game is 3 years old is no excuse. It should run even better on my PC then since it's well above spec for the game.
I wasn't comparing the gameplay of the two, I was commenting on how polished one is and the other isn't.
I like them both.