User comment history
< Newer [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ] Older >
| News Comments > Morning Previews |
 |
| 2. |
Re: ATID |
May 26, 2006, 20:21 |
WarPig |
|
|
I tried the beta for about 30 seconds, it was so laggy with about 6 FPS framerate. They need a new engine I think
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Televised Pro Gaming |
|
| 38. |
........ |
Apr 17, 2006, 23:10 |
WarPig |
|
|
And staying true to all previous Gaming TV attempts, they will pick the most nerdy dorks as the Announcers and Commentators. Have you see the videos at Gamespot, it's like we're being made fun of.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Galactic Civilizations II Beta Patch |
|
| 18. |
blah blah blah blah blah |
Mar 26, 2006, 18:05 |
WarPig |
|
|
You all must be blind fanboys cause this game shipped with some GLARING bugs, that other companies would take a lot of heat for if they did the same thing. Bugs with making and using fleets, bugs with disappearing ships, inconsistencies in navigating the interface.
And everyone caught up in the starforce debate saying
"OMG How can starforce promote piracy like that???? I'm gonna buy this game just for that reason!"
Stardock is a big company but they're always going on like they're still small time, well if they want me to buy their game they're gonna have to make it the way I want *EDIT* (which also happens to be the right way)
This comment was edited on Mar 26, 18:39. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Galactic Civilizations II Beta Patch |
|
| 12. |
Re: ........... |
Mar 26, 2006, 03:43 |
WarPig |
|
|
Well they didn't put out a demo and I wanted to play it and I don't have 45 bucks to waste.
So instead I downloaded what was essentially a BETA and helped BUGTEST it for them for free. They've probably used about 2 of my suggetions so far.
I'll buy the patched version later if it's good enough and in the meantime I don't even feel like playing the unpatched game , why? cause of the bugs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Galactic Civilizations II Beta Patch |
|
| 9. |
Re: ........... |
Mar 25, 2006, 22:57 |
WarPig |
|
|
wow i thought i said:
"Maybe they've fixed these things I dont know I can't use the patch if you know what I mean"
And I don't really feel like reading that novel length change log for a patch i can't use.
I think wrapping the map around would be ok as an OPTION. I like the idea because it would give extra dimension to the map. And the universe isn't exactly flat like it is in GalCiv, so whats your point.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Galactic Civilizations II Beta Patch |
|
| 6. |
........... |
Mar 25, 2006, 21:22 |
WarPig |
|
|
Huh what. What was my point? Oh yea new features arn't as important as fixing bugs/annoying interface things. Like when clicking "done" after building a ship from the planet view dumps you back into space. Also clicking a ship centers the camera on the ship which is annoying cause i didn't need the camera to move in the first place. Maybe they've fixed these things I dont know I can't use the patch if you know what I mean, hahaha.
But if they can fix the bugs AND do new features hey that's cool. At least they took my suggestion to remove the useless clutter in the ship design window.
Uhh what else oh yea a awesome feature to have would be able to play on maps that WRAP around. I suggested it to them but they said it would be unrealistic...uhhhh ok.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Galactic Civilizations II Beta Patch |
|
| 3. |
Uhh |
Mar 25, 2006, 19:02 |
WarPig |
|
|
I would hope there is more then just enhancements. Because there's really a lot of bugs in this game that are holding it back. It's still an awesome game but you have to acknowledge the bugs because at this point basically the customers are doing the beta testing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
190 Comments. 10 pages. Viewing page 1.
< Newer [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ] Older > |
|
|
|
|
|
Blue's News is a participant in Amazon Associates programs
and earns advertising fees by linking to Amazon.
|
|
|
|
Twitter 
