User information for Veggie

Real Name
Veggie
Nickname
None given.
Email
Concealed by request
Description
Homepage
None given.

Supporter

Signed On
July 1, 2003
Total Posts
20 (Suspect)
User ID
17613
Search For:
Sort Results:
Ascending
Descending
Limit Results:
 
20 Comments. 1 pages. Viewing page 1.
Newer [  1  ] Older
35.
 
No subject
May 6, 2007, 10:45
35.
No subject May 6, 2007, 10:45
May 6, 2007, 10:45
 
This release better have more than 4 hours of content this time around or its my last source purchase. They haven't released anything with major content yet.They made afew fun game's waaaaaaaay back in 1995 or sumthing, cant remember the dates but Day of defeat before it got bought out was a blast now it suffers from lack of content aswell. You can only play the same game for so long. And no multiplayer content what so ever from them. Deathmatch is not content people. Its total crap! get it through your heads Valve.

15.
 
Re: No subject
Jun 1, 2006, 19:39
15.
Re: No subject Jun 1, 2006, 19:39
Jun 1, 2006, 19:39
 
Took me longer to download then it did to beat it. But was fun while it lasted hehe. Seriously too short.

This comment was edited on Jun 1, 19:40.
19.
 
Re: Meh..
May 7, 2006, 09:47
19.
Re: Meh.. May 7, 2006, 09:47
May 7, 2006, 09:47
 
Can't see me paying almost 30cdn a month on this. Especially with SOE involved. Once they get there grubby fingers on your game, its just a matter of time b4 they kill it. Probly kill it b4 the release lmao. But the game has made up a huge following, hope it doe's well. But also hope it die's just to throw another nail in sony's coffin.

21.
 
Re: How'd I miss this?
Nov 25, 2005, 11:38
21.
Re: How'd I miss this? Nov 25, 2005, 11:38
Nov 25, 2005, 11:38
 
Advent Rising — (2005) GlyphX Inc. ................CRAP
America's Army — (2002) U.S. Army (The MOVES Institute)...CRAP
Brothers In Arms: Road to Hill 30 — (2005) Gearbox Software..not bad
Combat: Task Force 121 — (2005) Direct Action Games....crap
Dead Man's Hand — (2004) Human Head Studios...uttercrap
Desert Thunder — (2003) Brainbox Games....uttercrap
Deus Ex: Invisible War — (2003) Ion Storm.....not even gonna try, holy did this game suck
Devastation — (2003) Digitalo Studios.....garbage
Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban — (2004) KnowWonder Digital Mediaworks...wasnt bad but its a KIDS game
Lineage II — (2004) NCsoft....not bad too, but a bargain bin filler
Magic: The Gathering Battlegrounds — (2003) Atari......crap
Marine Heavy Gunner: Vietnam — (2004) Brainbox Games...oh man did this one suck
Men of Valor — (2004) 2015, Inc.....not too bad really
Pariah — (2005) Digital Extremes.....waste of time
Postal² — (2003) Running With Scissors, Inc....fun for a run and gun
Ragnarok Online 2 — (2006) Gravity Corporation....Ragnawho?
Sephiroth — Imazic Entertainment...another noone played for more than 2 minutes
Shadow Ops: Red Mercury — (2004) Zombie.....not to bad in some places
Star Wars: Republic Commando — (2005) LucasArts....crap
SWAT 4 — (2005) Irrational Games.....ubercrap
Thief: Deadly Shadows — (2004) Ion Storm.....not to bad, best UT engine game i tried i think.
The Chronicles of Spellborn — (2006) Spellborn International....not sure
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six 3: Raven Shield — (2003) Ubisoft...belongs in books, when i saw a haertbeat monitor in this game i was like wow an official cheat already in the game, nice......uttergarbage
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six 3: Athena Sword — (2004) Ubisoft
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six 3: Iron Wrath — (2005) Ubisoft
Tom Clancy's Splinter Cell — (2003) Ubisoft..great for a CONSOLE
Tom Clancy's Splinter Cell: Pandora Tomorrow — (2004 Ubisoft...crap
Tom Clancy's Splinter Cell: Chaos Theory — (2005) Ubisoft...crap
So anything else to add the wonderfull world of UT? hehe sorry man i just hate the engine sooo much, its like polished turd, all nice and shiny, but its still a turd

18.
 
Re: How'd I miss this?
Nov 24, 2005, 22:30
18.
Re: How'd I miss this? Nov 24, 2005, 22:30
Nov 24, 2005, 22:30
 
Ok my mistake, i thought they were porting it to Source, jeez.....still using UT engine. Another reason not to buy. I played the original releases of RO, though well done for the engine,UT looks pretty sometimes, but i dont like the feal of the engine, so much effort on UT engine is waste of time if u ask me.Makes a good DM game but add to much to it and wow does it suck.

9.
 
Re: How'd I miss this?
Nov 24, 2005, 16:16
9.
Re: How'd I miss this? Nov 24, 2005, 16:16
Nov 24, 2005, 16:16
 
Lets see, pay for R.O? uuuum no......What happened to all the free mods everyone was gonna make with the source code that was gona be soo user and mod friendly and easy to use that we should be swamped with source mods? All im seeing is a purchase to play half done, buggy, awfull multiplayer experience so far with source not to mention they gakked everything over 32 players. R.O. my thoughts is keep it free or it will die. Garranteed.

This comment was edited on Nov 24, 16:19.
1.
 
Greed
Aug 24, 2005, 11:10
1.
Greed Aug 24, 2005, 11:10
Aug 24, 2005, 11:10
 
Myself personnaly i think musicians should be paid for concerts and live performances ONLY! Making millions off of cd sales is rediculous.it cost's 12cents to make a cd and ship it to a store yet i pay near 20$ per album. So the artist takes a year to make and produce and album yet they rake in millions for 1 years work.All i can say is FUCK OFF. work for your money like everyone else.

8.
 
Re: *yawn*
Jul 25, 2005, 13:00
8.
Re: *yawn* Jul 25, 2005, 13:00
Jul 25, 2005, 13:00
 
The engine for the 1st one was ok,biggest gripe was the buildings and structures and that they were fixed locations,not allowing you to construct good defendable bases,scale of units was one of those games where the guys are too big for the houses,and looks retarded if you ask me.Gave the 1st one a 3 outa 10 for those huge flaws.

32.
 
Re: No subject
Jul 22, 2005, 18:59
32.
Re: No subject Jul 22, 2005, 18:59
Jul 22, 2005, 18:59
 
Ea gets there foot in the door,altho its the left foot it wont be long man,trust me.And HL2 game of the year,by who?gamespy? lmao the game sucked,story sucks,but ohh the physics i forgot.There a cooked turkey,just a matter of time.The HL2 source engine sucks bigtime,great for singleplayer but multiplayer its a joke.U'll never ever ever see HL2 source push more than 36 players online.And it took Valve 5 years to make what it is and that aint too impressive other than the physics.Rest is a rehash of HL1.Just doesnt take much to impress people these days i think.

This comment was edited on Jul 22, 19:04.
30.
 
Re: bottom line...
Jul 22, 2005, 10:14
30.
Re: bottom line... Jul 22, 2005, 10:14
Jul 22, 2005, 10:14
 
Valve fell asleep on the release of this game,CSS that is.Its like 2 years to late valve,wake up u smucks.As a huge fan of day of defeat,which still makes CSS look like it was built for retards.By the time any mods or good games come outa the source engine,the engine will be old and very rusty,infact ill be surprised if it makes any more mods.I mean this is what 7years later since HL1 was released and CSS still has the exact same laggy ass netcode that u cant enter an open area or room bigger than a gymnasium without everyone doing skip lag everywhere.Games junk,so far i'v seen "1" mod for it called Plan of Attack,not to shabby but lags like hell making it unplayable,thus why noone will make mods for Source!!!EVER! And if that isnt bad enough EA is gonna buy it up,lmfao then u'll get great customer service and help building your source mods...........not!Infact now that im on the EA thing,i think EA will make HL2 dry up like an old tumbleweed,thus making all you CS fanboys play BF2.Mark my word's it will happen.EA will hire and fire Valve,best way to knock your competition off aint it?Ea so far has ruined every game maker they set there greedy eye's on.Valve is no different than Westwood or Blizzard.I feal the nail's being pounded into Valve's coffin.

This comment was edited on Jul 22, 10:59.
25.
 
Re: No subject
Jul 1, 2005, 11:58
25.
Re: No subject Jul 1, 2005, 11:58
Jul 1, 2005, 11:58
 
Id like to see a warning on the flags when there being capped,or make them slower cap times.Nothing worse than playing leapfrog the whole map,i mean we cap a flag and get 30ft away and next thing its back to the enemy again.Dumb i think.Game runs great for me on a AMD 2500 @ 3200 FX5900 1gig ram

This comment was edited on Jul 1, 12:00.
23.
 
No subject
Jun 24, 2005, 10:57
23.
No subject Jun 24, 2005, 10:57
Jun 24, 2005, 10:57
 
As if we the people dont have enough monthly bills,hope somone mods the crap outa this and we can all avoid the stats crap.Stats are nice but as a person for the people i think they can shove them in their ass.There charging way too much for stats per month anyway!!!All this pay to play crap is adding up for gamers lately.Better boycott em quick or this is gonna overflow into mainstream gaming in a hurry!Nothing worse than having corp hands in your pocket all the time,trust me.FUCK YOU EA! Also like to add that the only quality servers ever were not EA's,infact EA's sucked so much ass that i refused to play on them for BFV.They only servers that are fun 90% of the time are owned by private guys.So i see most of these guys wont be paying the amount sony wants,thus sony has nuked alot of its core fans already.Nice job

This comment was edited on Jun 24, 11:02.
11.
 
No subject
Sep 16, 2004, 19:09
11.
No subject Sep 16, 2004, 19:09
Sep 16, 2004, 19:09
 
After my recent purchase of Soldiers Heroes of WW2,which use's starforce.I will never buy another starforce game agian.Random crashes,random reboots,not to mention how bad it mess's windows up.Any game that needs such hardcore protection cant be very good.Or people would buy it.Therefore not needing this crap protection.

This comment was edited on Sep 16, 19:11.
18.
 
No subject
Feb 20, 2004, 14:07
18.
No subject Feb 20, 2004, 14:07
Feb 20, 2004, 14:07
 
They just released a new video,must say nice graphics on the sales pitch.Well put together video.One thing i dont understand tho about Phantom,says Intel motherboard,and AMD processor.hmm and up too 300gb harddrive,add all that together and its alot more than $300us which is what i guess there saying this box will cost?another Hmmmm

5.
 
No subject
Feb 19, 2004, 20:02
5.
No subject Feb 19, 2004, 20:02
Feb 19, 2004, 20:02
 
Wow what a scam,maybe that's why its called the Phantom?Cause it doesn't exist.Good thinking on the name there Timmy hehehe

102.
 
Re: WTG Valve!
Sep 24, 2003, 09:43
Re: WTG Valve! Sep 24, 2003, 09:43
Sep 24, 2003, 09:43
 
Naive??no just pissed at everygame release we gotta go through this crap.Getting real tired of it,no what i mean?If i manufacture something and it's said to be released to the PUBLIC on such an such a date,then by jeezus it should be released.I know people that have paid alot of cash just upgrading there comp's for this game.And with pc gear price's the way they are they could have waited and saved more money.Cause it was supposed to be sept 30,alot of pissed off people.God where is call of duty when u need it

This comment was edited on Sep 24, 09:50.
95.
 
Re: WTG Valve!
Sep 24, 2003, 09:14
95.
Re: WTG Valve! Sep 24, 2003, 09:14
Sep 24, 2003, 09:14
 
I dont care if you ban me or not,Valve you guy's should be shot with a bucket of your own shit!I'm not going to get in a big swearing scene but how in the hell can you idiot's take pre-order money from people when you dont even have the product to release???OMG,if i was rich i would take all gamedeveloper's that pull this bullshit to court,then maybe for once a gamedeveloper might actually be held acountable for there misleading's and lie's.You know what really piss's me off is that we all knew this was gonna happen too.And sure enough.............it did!Thank you Valve...assholes.I for one don't like being lied too.

11.
 
Re: No subject
Sep 21, 2003, 13:29
11.
Re: No subject Sep 21, 2003, 13:29
Sep 21, 2003, 13:29
 
I can't believe there still making these old PS1 engine games,what i mean by that is 1 camera per room is kinda lame these days.And the 3 button madness for controls were not what i was expecting from this release.I think my faith in EA has been tarnished.They gotta start getting some control over there release's or less for that matter.Ever since they started buying up developer's projects i think the games themselves have suffered.

33.
 
Re: Any good?
Sep 10, 2003, 19:39
33.
Re: Any good? Sep 10, 2003, 19:39
Sep 10, 2003, 19:39
 
Well i just played it,was like most people,thought it was gonna be something really good,Well it runs like utter crap,goddamn slideshow,my system specs are waaaay over the minimum,G3 Ti500,AMD 2100,512 Dualchannel DDR,still i get huge choppyness,even with shadows and lighting off and textures on medium,32 man servers are physically unplayable waaay to much lag!

17.
 
Re: I hope it is a fun demo!
Jun 30, 2003, 20:48
17.
Re: I hope it is a fun demo! Jun 30, 2003, 20:48
Jun 30, 2003, 20:48
 
Well i wasn't really impressed,graphics are ok,but the gameplay is kinda lame,run around and throw your disc thingy at CS jumping mad men:(

20 Comments. 1 pages. Viewing page 1.
Newer [  1  ] Older