User information for Alexander

Real Name
Alexander
Nickname
instant
Email
Concealed by request - Send Mail
Description
Signed On
June 19, 2003
Supporter
-
Total Posts
189 (Novice)
User ID
17529
Search For:
Sort Results:
Ascending
Descending
Limit Results:
 
189 Comments. 10 pages. Viewing page 1.
Newer [  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  ] Older
62.
 
Re: No no no and no.
Aug 29, 2008, 21:33
62.
Re: No no no and no. Aug 29, 2008, 21:33
Aug 29, 2008, 21:33
 
50. No no no and no. Aug 29, 17:15 Jack9
Good thing I don't visit Stardock (because they are fuckwads) or GPG (they associate with fuckwads), ever.

--

Derek S, is that you?

61.
 
Hear Hear!
Aug 29, 2008, 21:31
61.
Hear Hear! Aug 29, 2008, 21:31
Aug 29, 2008, 21:31
 
At least some companies got it right!

Now go buy their games!

241.
 
BS.
Aug 29, 2008, 21:24
BS. Aug 29, 2008, 21:24
Aug 29, 2008, 21:24
 
Blame piracy all you want, the fact is that most PCs could'nt even run the damn game at an acceptable framerate, and I would guess the a lot of those downloading the patches or trying out the game are just benchmarking their pc and should not be counted as a lost sale. Some of them might even want to see if there is some magical patch that suddenly makes the game playable on a normal-level pc so they can go out an buy it.. assuming the game got rid of any copy restriction technologies infecting the title..

Anyone who still believes in Digital RESTRICTION Management technologies should be put in an lunatic asylum, or in the very least called a fucking moron and put in the corner of shame, with the funny hat on for good measure.



Edit:
If they wanted to make a benchmarking tool for PCs they should'nt have slapped a 70$ price tag on it and infected it with copy restriction malware.

In addition, a few probably bought a lot of new hardware to run the damn game, including some pirates.. so maybe Nvidia and AtI, whoever you partnered with to create this monstrosity should give them a little 'cut' of their profits for helping them sell 3D Toasters.
This comment was edited on Aug 29, 21:28.
20.
 
GFW ...
Aug 7, 2008, 14:23
20.
GFW ... Aug 7, 2008, 14:23
Aug 7, 2008, 14:23
 
Well, I think i'll just stick to GTA4 on the console, even though GTA's on the PC been fun, the multiplayer component on the PC version will undoubtedly suck because the people making/in charge of it are bastards.

Outcome a: Its made to work with console, this guarantees a large pool of players, but it will be marred with lots of problems connecting, browsing servers and hosting your own.

Outcome b: It does not work with the console version, which means very few servers since everyone is playing it on the console, the ingame browser will probably still suck (especially if its Gayspy), and.. well, its just bad.

In short: The end is nigh.


14.
 
well
Aug 7, 2008, 14:15
14.
well Aug 7, 2008, 14:15
Aug 7, 2008, 14:15
 
"Must be heartening to be a musician and hear a label refer to your music as "content we own and control."


How many musicians do you think will actually hear this? The people they talk to are in the biz, and they wont tell their gold egg laying ducks the truth now, will they.

1.
 
yay!
Aug 2, 2008, 00:29
1.
yay! Aug 2, 2008, 00:29
Aug 2, 2008, 00:29
 
Looking forward to this one!

1.
 
Beyond Divinity
Apr 19, 2005, 05:30
1.
Beyond Divinity Apr 19, 2005, 05:30
Apr 19, 2005, 05:30
 
= Starforce


14.
 
Re: bah
Feb 9, 2005, 10:38
14.
Re: bah Feb 9, 2005, 10:38
Feb 9, 2005, 10:38
 
Game over man.. game over..

8.
 
Re: And so I pray...
Dec 15, 2004, 07:07
8.
Re: And so I pray... Dec 15, 2004, 07:07
Dec 15, 2004, 07:07
 
What will happen to ASE now?!?!

Edit: I also bought ASE.. argh!

This comment was edited on Dec 15, 07:11.
23.
 
Chrome = Good
Dec 9, 2004, 08:07
23.
Chrome = Good Dec 9, 2004, 08:07
Dec 9, 2004, 08:07
 
Chrome is really good.


6.
 
Re: Cheaters are going to ruin this game
Dec 9, 2004, 08:06
6.
Re: Cheaters are going to ruin this game Dec 9, 2004, 08:06
Dec 9, 2004, 08:06
 
Well, there was a lot of promising aspects of the game..
unfortunately it looked like shit.. and had a few other lacking areas as well..

like the sleep inducing long treks into nowhere to get to elsewhere.. .. I have never fallen asleep while playing a game so many times as I did with Shadowbane.

I'd actually recomend it to people who have problem falling asleep.. no problem, play Shadowbane.. Zzzzz

17.
 
Re: No subject
Dec 9, 2004, 08:01
17.
Re: No subject Dec 9, 2004, 08:01
Dec 9, 2004, 08:01
 
Nothing wrong with bots or ebays.

The biggest problem with MMORPGS are pathetic Whiners [Why did he get!!.. *grief**whine*].. and most of them are American. :-)

5.
 
No subject
Dec 9, 2004, 07:59
5.
No subject Dec 9, 2004, 07:59
Dec 9, 2004, 07:59
 
I feel sorry for Wings.

But more sorry for us.. who never got to play the Söldner we wanted to play..

4.
 
Re: Add-on?
Dec 7, 2004, 05:51
4.
Re: Add-on? Dec 7, 2004, 05:51
Dec 7, 2004, 05:51
 
they stopped calling it patches and named it add-on instead?

Sorry Wings.. but you fucked up so much with Söldner I wont even look at the add-on.

And I am sure that this goes for many others.. when you ask "why wont you look at our fabulous add-on"..

You ruined Söldner! A game which we had so high hopes for and wanted to play so much. You destroyed all that was good in the world and replaced it with filthy publisher slop. You blackened our sun and salted our lands - lands that were full of hope for Söldner and the fun we would share.

Bastards!

11.
 
No subject
Dec 1, 2004, 09:20
11.
No subject Dec 1, 2004, 09:20
Dec 1, 2004, 09:20
 
Dumbing down titles is in a way like this:

A restaurant with 4 stars in the Micheleng guide will perhaps have 12.000 visitors a year, and be regarded as one of the best restaurants in the world.

THe local McDonalds will serve 45.000 vistors, and worldwide many millions.

Will people say that McDonalds serve better food than the 4 star restaurant?


--
Rainbow 6 is the 4 star restaurant
RAinbow 6 Four is the McDonalds

1.
 
No subject
Dec 1, 2004, 06:36
1.
No subject Dec 1, 2004, 06:36
Dec 1, 2004, 06:36
 
Still requires cd-in-drive.

Still no purchase.

7.
 
yuck
Dec 1, 2004, 04:31
7.
yuck Dec 1, 2004, 04:31
Dec 1, 2004, 04:31
 
That movie was so bad i had to stop it after a short while...

Another PC title ruined by consoleism.

43.
 
Re: No subject
Dec 1, 2004, 04:08
43.
Re: No subject Dec 1, 2004, 04:08
Dec 1, 2004, 04:08
 
#8 Malakai

So how come you are not playing Operation Flashpoint.

All these arcadey kiddy shooters with friggin' laser beams are bull.

60.
 
No subject
Nov 26, 2004, 20:06
60.
No subject Nov 26, 2004, 20:06
Nov 26, 2004, 20:06
 
#59 Creston:
Actually, Zurra posted the following
"EQ2 is the superior game"

And the rest is posted as a 'run-through' of the games appearing to be factual comparison although in reality it is a poor attempt at camuflaging a heavily slated 'EQ2 is better than WoW and here is why' posting.

56.
 
Re: No subject
Nov 26, 2004, 09:26
56.
Re: No subject Nov 26, 2004, 09:26
Nov 26, 2004, 09:26
 
1. Read all the threads
2. Think
3. ?????
4. Edit your posting (or profit).

189 Comments. 10 pages. Viewing page 1.
Newer [  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  ] Older