Acleacius wrote on Jan 25, 2021, 11:17:
All we can do is hope but it's ea, does anything else really need to be said?

I'm thinking this may not be from ea.

EricFate wrote on Jan 24, 2021, 16:58:
If it ain't Obsidian, then I don't care.

If it is good and made by the Pillsbury Dough Boy, I care.

When I think traditional watch I think someone trying to be fashionable.
When I think smart watch I think someone trying to be healthy.
When I think no watch, I think there are many ways now to tell time without one.

Each has a place and poo poo'ing any of these means we just have a crabby opinion about anything.

I'm confident in saying this franchise is dead in the case of a CP2078. That's what rushing can do. I could be wrong, we'll see.

I just want my GPU's back.

Would have been great if it was a story based space sim.

Beamer wrote on Jan 13, 2021, 22:32:
I was banned from the Donald and conservative on reddit. And libertarian. Seems that conservatives love banning, as well.

This is true and has been going on for years, they don't see their own self imposed wall gardens. They want to be able to say what they want without any rebuttal, control speech. To me that always looked snowflake as fuck. But that said, I never thought legal free speech was in jeopardy with these online places doing that. I understood how and why it happened and it had nothing to do with the 1rst, just ironic that these were the people doing this. I didn't decide I was anti-gov't because they did this. I didn't feel the urge to break things because the did this. I didn't play around with overthrowing the gov't because of their walled gardens.

Nah they are having some upstairs issues. They feel they are so right in all of this and at best both sides have some points and some warts, but there still really is a lot of commonality, I really feel the core is an economical one that if many were doing better they'd be much more content to watch Office reruns on their new TV and furniture. But they won't step back. I'm convinced their world if we were so blessed to live it, it would be at best no better than what we have now, just a minor deviation. Just history repeating itself and then what are they going to do with things they find controversial but are really freedoms we have today? They are going to ban those and once again back to the irony, the freedom yellers really want more restrictions than what we currently have, just a different mix of which.

Beamer wrote on Jan 13, 2021, 22:32:
I was banned from the Donald and conservative on reddit. And libertarian. Seems that conservatives love banning, as well.

Right they spew freedom but it always took cozying up to mods just to post in their sites. I can go to politics, you can, anyone can and start posting without a secret handshake.

Being Massive until we have more details I would think this will be a GaaS and think something like Division. So I would expect online.

I'm enjoying it, but to think they made anything close to perfection on the PC and the last gen consoles unfortunately got shafted. We'll that's a bit too thick for me, there is plenty of "push it out the door" going on with the PC game as well. Just sayin. The best thing is we are talking about a game so whoopi.

theglaze wrote on Jan 12, 2021, 21:56:
4GB more than the 3070, 2GB more than 3080... huh?

It's their new top of the line!

Simon Says wrote on Jan 12, 2021, 16:09:

HorrorScope wrote on Jan 12, 2021, 16:01:

Simon Says wrote on Jan 12, 2021, 12:48:

Cutter wrote on Jan 12, 2021, 11:41:
Is Intel throwing in the towel?

For now they don't really have a choice, they've squeezed all they could out of that 14nm+++++∞ cow and 10nm still isn't ready for prime time...

And they just announced they would manufacture their GPUs on TSMC's 7nm+: https://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSKBN29H0EZ

Well my son couldn't wait any longer, we still went intel because you can't get current gen AMD. 10600K for him, that is still plenty strong. I can assure the audience that was not the plan, this was supposed to be a 5600x.

In sports and now in tech, availability is a great ability.

As for sockets, for a lot of us, does it even matter? Are we really upgrading CPU's all that often? If you are, sure, but it you wait like 5+ I would just expect a whole new bottom end.

To be fair, Intel's 6 core offerings right now, at the right price, are better price/perf than AMD's Ryzen 5 series. The 10400F in particular is pretty sweet under 200$.

Yep my decision was between the 10600K and the 10400F. The 400 is a great bargain, but we have some extra cash to get a notch better.

This comment was edited on Jan 12, 2021, 22:04.

The Flying Penguin wrote on Jan 12, 2021, 13:40:
For the life of me, I don't understand why conservatives want to repeal section 230.

This to, it is just more mix up with Conservative thoughts. That is even more censorship, good or bad depending on what is being censored.

Don't try to topple this or any gov't. At the top isn't Disneyland, it's as serious as terminal cancer.

You try to topple the gov't, you get things taken from you and you should.
You don't have the right to topple the gov't.

To think a gov't would sit bye and do nothing is beyond laughable.
This has nothing to do with California either, they fight for more rights in the states then anyone.

Simon Says wrote on Jan 12, 2021, 12:48:

Cutter wrote on Jan 12, 2021, 11:41:
Is Intel throwing in the towel?

For now they don't really have a choice, they've squeezed all they could out of that 14nm+++++∞ cow and 10nm still isn't ready for prime time...

And they just announced they would manufacture their GPUs on TSMC's 7nm+: https://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSKBN29H0EZ

Well my son couldn't wait any longer, we still went intel because you can't get current gen AMD. 10600K for him, that is still plenty strong. I can assure the audience that was not the plan, this was supposed to be a 5600x.

In sports and now in tech, availability is a great ability.

As for sockets, for a lot of us, does it even matter? Are we really upgrading CPU's all that often? If you are, sure, but it you wait like 5+ I would just expect a whole new bottom end.

This comment was edited on Jan 12, 2021, 22:04.

Mr. Tact wrote on Jan 12, 2021, 12:17:

Mike1233 wrote on Jan 12, 2021, 11:50:
"Anytime I hear someone say the solution to the problem is to 'vote with your wallet', I know that cause is doomed."
- Some guy

Which way am I supposed to take that? It always works or never works? Because clearly neither is correct.

Individually it works, as you voted with your wallet either way, direct.
As a group, its nothing more than a suggestion for others to consider, indirect.

Xero wrote on Jan 12, 2021, 11:11:
What is funny, is when we talk about these "other" groups that become radicalized when they are reading too deep into dark beliefs or ideas and that is when they're willing to perform some act of terror, etc. How about basically this occurring to thousands and thousands? How is it all that much different? You had a legion of drones show up willing to take hostages, kill if necessary, force the flipping of a fair election and then go home and go back to work. Wtf is wrong with this country.

It's the manson's at the highest level in the land.

edaciousx wrote on Jan 12, 2021, 03:49:
Social media needs to be classified and regulated as a public utility. Social media should only restrict speech that posses imminent threat, not hate. You're allowed to speak out against something you aren't happy about, the left had 4 years calling everyone on the right stupid white national Nazis which is hate speech.

With everything the left has done to the right, I only see further escalation. And yes, the right has their faults too but there is significantly more blame on the left for our current situation.

That's fine on being a public utility but that isn't where we are at today. "Posses Imminent Threat", well that is where we are at right now, we have warning of formations at all capitol's. We have a president that wants to be a lifelong dictator, in fact I would make him show up at the inauguration, to me I wouldn't even have one currently in the traditional manner, all those lawmakers and not the president in one place, it's a tactical failure and on top of that we know law enforcement supports the president overall and they can't be trusted as anyone can see at this point from just last week alone. I feel all those are true and imo that is imminent. So then what we are seeing to me seems justified under your definition. You have to error on the side of caution, we are talking about overthrowing the gov't. If not this, then what?

Agreed fujijuice.

I want to add again, of all the places that let people talk politics (on topic or not) and it has people on both sides, I swear and I don't know how or why but this place seems to handle it the best. I know overall it leans a bit one way, but it never goes nuclear like any other place does.

edaciousx wrote on Jan 12, 2021, 03:43:

Agreed... the internet was a better more free place in the 90s and early 2000s.

It was a baby still waiting to grow and be conquered and that is just what happened. It was bound to happen.

I wish we had Polish problems.