User information for famished

Real Name
famished
Nickname
famished
Email
Concealed by request
Description
Homepage
Signed On
May 21, 2003
Supporter
-
Total Posts
704 (Apprentice)
User ID
17145
Search For:
Sort Results:
Ascending
Descending
Limit Results:
 
704 Comments. 36 pages. Viewing page 15.
Newer [  1    10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25    36  ] Older
105.
 
Re: Well
Jul 26, 2005, 17:02
Re: Well Jul 26, 2005, 17:02
Jul 26, 2005, 17:02
 
Thanks, but I'm the type of person who would rather just bitch about it.

Ah! So you're English?

20.
 
Re: Well
Jul 26, 2005, 12:50
20.
Re: Well Jul 26, 2005, 12:50
Jul 26, 2005, 12:50
 
Rick, get Firefox. Actually I think even IE has a built in popup blocker now.

3.
 
Re: garbage
Jul 26, 2005, 11:59
3.
Re: garbage Jul 26, 2005, 11:59
Jul 26, 2005, 11:59
 
Is this a mod for Dawn of War or an official product?

5.
 
Re: Well
Jul 26, 2005, 11:55
5.
Re: Well Jul 26, 2005, 11:55
Jul 26, 2005, 11:55
 
So other than making themselves look important to concerned parents everywhere (HA!), what's the point?

Because it's a requirement of localisation perhaps? Or do you mean a federal inquiry is useless? I think any boost in sales probably hasn't turned the loss they incurred in stock trading. At least from what I heard.

This comment was edited on Jul 26, 11:58.
4.
 
Re: No subject
Jul 21, 2005, 17:45
4.
Re: No subject Jul 21, 2005, 17:45
Jul 21, 2005, 17:45
 
Hey dont knock cricket

14.
 
Re: looks cool
Jul 19, 2005, 15:37
14.
Re: looks cool Jul 19, 2005, 15:37
Jul 19, 2005, 15:37
 
Wow, 10 posts before someone dissed the English, that must be a new record

I read the first paragraph, then headed to this forum only to be disappointed with praise for the game instead of ridicule for the press release.

14.
 
Re: Spelling
Jul 19, 2005, 08:01
14.
Re: Spelling Jul 19, 2005, 08:01
Jul 19, 2005, 08:01
 
Awesome. For a moment there I thought it'd be all about loosing.
or "losing"

At least the subject is fitting.

25.
 
Re: No subject
Jul 18, 2005, 17:41
25.
Re: No subject Jul 18, 2005, 17:41
Jul 18, 2005, 17:41
 
*chokes on his coffee in hysterics*

Yeah - I have a few Oil tunes floating around the place


This comment was edited on Jul 18, 17:46.
23.
 
Re: No subject
Jul 18, 2005, 17:39
23.
Re: No subject Jul 18, 2005, 17:39
Jul 18, 2005, 17:39
 
"...the publisher that needs every one of its titles warezed"
"Edit: Bunch of fuckin' morons. You know who you are."

http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=thief

19.
 
Re: No subject
Jul 18, 2005, 17:35
19.
Re: No subject Jul 18, 2005, 17:35
Jul 18, 2005, 17:35
 
...and if I work all day on the blue sky mine
There'll be pay in your pocket tonight.

1.
 
ns
Jul 15, 2005, 08:19
1.
ns Jul 15, 2005, 08:19
Jul 15, 2005, 08:19
 
*tumbleweed*

6.
 
Re: cricket
Jul 2, 2005, 05:33
6.
Re: cricket Jul 2, 2005, 05:33
Jul 2, 2005, 05:33
 
I hope so. This demo had some major issues.

23.
 
Re: Cricket
Jun 30, 2005, 18:58
23.
Re: Cricket Jun 30, 2005, 18:58
Jun 30, 2005, 18:58
 
Speaking as an american, cricket seems like a cool sport. I don't see why the other posters have to be so critical. Boston needs a circket team so we can get yet another world championship!

? Boston? Cricket? World Championship? Please educate me.

22.
 
Re: Actually
Jun 30, 2005, 18:56
22.
Re: Actually Jun 30, 2005, 18:56
Jun 30, 2005, 18:56
 
Lets hope this blows that crap EA Cricket 2005 demo out of the water.
Yeah that demo was very bad. I'm looking forward to test this. All 900Mb of it

9.
 
Re: No subject
Jun 30, 2005, 09:48
9.
Re: No subject Jun 30, 2005, 09:48
Jun 30, 2005, 09:48
 
This has got to be better than the EA sports version right?

37.
 
No subject
Jun 28, 2005, 16:50
37.
No subject Jun 28, 2005, 16:50
Jun 28, 2005, 16:50
 
Let me be the first to say King Kong looks awful. Why on earth would Peter Jackson do a remake of this? Too may themes together in one film - it's doomed to fail. Wait a minute, I know why he did this...

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0103873/

This comment was edited on Jun 28, 17:08.
30.
 
Re: No subject
Jun 27, 2005, 14:38
30.
Re: No subject Jun 27, 2005, 14:38
Jun 27, 2005, 14:38
 
I saw a "bbc" article recently (on humans) which was nothing more than a hoax story. Wouldn't be surprised about this one either.

[edit] um, being a hoax that is.

This comment was edited on Jun 27, 14:39.
7.
 
Re: Clouds & cell phones
Jun 26, 2005, 17:22
7.
Re: Clouds & cell phones Jun 26, 2005, 17:22
Jun 26, 2005, 17:22
 
Those clouds are amazing. They look fake.

2.
 
Re: No subject
Jun 25, 2005, 08:22
2.
Re: No subject Jun 25, 2005, 08:22
Jun 25, 2005, 08:22
 
This game would be better if it didnt randomly go back to desktop whenever it felt like it

This comment was edited on Jun 25, 08:25.
34.
 
Re: No subject
Jun 25, 2005, 07:31
34.
Re: No subject Jun 25, 2005, 07:31
Jun 25, 2005, 07:31
 
I still remember System Shock 1 supporting stereoscope glasses

So did Quake 1. Back in the day when I earned obscene amounts of money for my age and had no idea what to do with it at the time, I bought a VFX 1. Playing Quake in full 3d was a very different experience. In the end I sold it as it was an impractical piece of hardware with such a small viewing area, low resolution (at the time 3d accelerators had just started to move in) and latency.

I think playing an FPS with one of these things in the future would drastically change gameplay, slowing it down a lot. I agree with StreetPreacher. At the very least the range of view needs to be increased.

704 Comments. 36 pages. Viewing page 15.
Newer [  1    10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25    36  ] Older