User information for Ulster

Real Name
Ulster
Nickname
None given.
Email
Concealed by request
Description
Homepage
None given.

Supporter

Signed On
February 27, 2003
Total Posts
14 (Suspect)
User ID
16301
Search For:
Sort Results:
Ascending
Descending
Limit Results:
 
14 Comments. 1 pages. Viewing page 1.
Newer [  1  ] Older
1.
 
Re: Morning Metaverse
Jun 26, 2019, 13:22
1.
Re: Morning Metaverse Jun 26, 2019, 13:22
Jun 26, 2019, 13:22
 
Just what everyone wants to see, Bernie Sanders twitching.
65.
 
Re: Oculus Facing Political Backlash [Updated]
Sep 24, 2016, 09:08
65.
Re: Oculus Facing Political Backlash [Updated] Sep 24, 2016, 09:08
Sep 24, 2016, 09:08
 
Slick wrote on Sep 24, 2016, 08:30:
Ulster wrote on Sep 24, 2016, 08:24:
Slick, you are definitely in one side of my 33% statement. You are just as bad as the people that you hurl crap at on the other side.

I see a wall of Blah Blah in your post, that started by passively aggressively calling the other side racists.

Like I said...this shit's gotta stop at some point.

Where did I call people racist? Trump IS a racist, he shouts it loudly and proudly, have you ever heard him speak? I'm not putting words in his mouth. Reporting verbatim on things a politician has said (repeatedly) is not somehow stooping to their level.

That's a bullshit comparison and you know it.

When people find the quality of racism to be an endearing quality in a candidate, guess what? They're probably racists.

And if you can't even be bothered to read what's being said, you really have nothing to gain by commenting on it.

Oh, I read it. Ironically I didn't have to read far at all: first two sentences: "It's really because the president for the last 8 years has been (half) black. That's really it"

That is calling folks racist and you know it. Like I said, you're no better than the other guys. Keep throwing the fire bombs.

60.
 
Re: Oculus Facing Political Backlash [Updated]
Sep 24, 2016, 08:24
60.
Re: Oculus Facing Political Backlash [Updated] Sep 24, 2016, 08:24
Sep 24, 2016, 08:24
 
Slick, you are definitely in one side of my 33% statement. You are just as bad as the people that you hurl crap at on the other side.

I see a wall of Blah Blah in your post, that started by passively aggressively calling the other side racists.

Like I said...this shit's gotta stop at some point.
54.
 
Re: Oculus Facing Political Backlash [Updated]
Sep 24, 2016, 07:23
54.
Re: Oculus Facing Political Backlash [Updated] Sep 24, 2016, 07:23
Sep 24, 2016, 07:23
 
There is little doubt that we are heading for real civil unrest. The signs are all there - the absolute and curious inability to find common ground, the wars against police, and the general hatred you see in threads like this all across the internet. You know, Trump supporters are retards and Hillary supporters are liars, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc.

How did we get to the point where 33% of our population hates another 33% of the same population to this degree? I can assure you that we in the remaining 34% are shaking our heads in disgust.

I swear, it's almost like trolling has become mainstream.

3.
 
Re: No subject
Oct 23, 2006, 16:32
3.
Re: No subject Oct 23, 2006, 16:32
Oct 23, 2006, 16:32
 
It was a very fun game for about 2 weeks. Then the new-ness wore off. It is still a nice game to play to kill 30 minutes.

For a bit over $10 I was really impressed.

2.
 
Re: ati stream computing
Sep 30, 2006, 10:52
2.
Re: ati stream computing Sep 30, 2006, 10:52
Sep 30, 2006, 10:52
 
I disagree and this could actually be very good for gaming. This has the potential to use the GPU as a physics offload engine, for example. Pretty cool stuff.

4.
 
Re: wow
Sep 26, 2006, 16:30
4.
Re: wow Sep 26, 2006, 16:30
Sep 26, 2006, 16:30
 
Me-thinks that Paul can't afford the monthly subscription and feels some anger over that.

Otherwise, running around screaming how much you don't like something reminds me a lot of Brick from "Anchorman"..."I love lamp".

edit: oops formatting wrong


This comment was edited on Sep 26, 16:31.
21.
 
Re: FoxConn
Jul 24, 2006, 11:47
21.
Re: FoxConn Jul 24, 2006, 11:47
Jul 24, 2006, 11:47
 
You guys are all thinking too short term. This has absolutely nothing to do with AMD wanting to sell Radeon's or chipsets. Long term, and I'm talking 3-5 years, GPU's will be DEAD. All graphics will be integrated into the CPU, where it can be done better and faster than on a GPU. Before you flame me for that comment, please do some homework first.

So, with GPU's being integrated into CPU's, it makes absolute sense for AMD to acquire the graphics know-how to make this happen. For ATI, the deal makes sense as it helps them survive past 5 years.

5.
 
Re: No subject
Dec 16, 2004, 17:47
5.
Re: No subject Dec 16, 2004, 17:47
Dec 16, 2004, 17:47
 
I have been beta testing HOI2 for a few months. To state that they didn't change anything isn't true. The gameplay is very similar, but they overhauled the way just about everything is done. In some ways, HOI2 is more complex than HOI was. It's certainly a lot deeper.

I understand the Turbotax comment, but if you stick with the game and make it past the learning curve, you'll find MP games to be a great amount of fun. Think of it as getting a rebate after figuring out Turbotax :-)

3.
 
Re: for Halsy ...CLASSIC !
Nov 13, 2004, 14:01
3.
Re: for Halsy ...CLASSIC ! Nov 13, 2004, 14:01
Nov 13, 2004, 14:01
 
LOL...I get a kick out of losers. Your guy lost because he is a pussy, and now all you can do is call Bush an asshole. ROFLMAO...enjoy the next four years!

6.
 
Re: No subject
Aug 4, 2004, 14:59
6.
Re: No subject Aug 4, 2004, 14:59
Aug 4, 2004, 14:59
 
Paradox does not create bargin bin RTS trash. These guys know strategy games. Europa Universalis and Hearts of Iron are some of the most complex and deep games on the market.

39.
 
Re: You forget...
Feb 27, 2003, 20:04
39.
Re: You forget... Feb 27, 2003, 20:04
Feb 27, 2003, 20:04
 
To the person who suggested that backwards compatibility is not desired. In the business world, especially in the tough economic market we are in, businesses do not have the resources to go out and change all of their software. Additionally, you get a chicken and egg thing going. Developers don't want to create too much content because the hardware isn't in place and the market is small. While at the same time, users don't want to invest in hardware that isn't widely supported by software. Its a catch-22.

However, by building in backwards compatibility, AMD will actually SPEED up the process of 64 bit migration by giving end users the comfort factor of having the ability to run both new 64 bit applications as well as current applications. This in turn will give software developers a larger market of 64 bit computers and therefore will naturally develop software to support.

AMD will lead the 64 bit migration by using this approach.

38.
 
Re: You forget...
Feb 27, 2003, 19:56
38.
Re: You forget... Feb 27, 2003, 19:56
Feb 27, 2003, 19:56
 
First, to the person who posted about the Barton. The Barton has a much larger cache.

Regarding the mention of a 2GB limitation in 32 bit computing, the limitation is actually 4GB. In 64 bit, the theoretical limitation is 2TB!

9.
 
Re: No subject
Feb 26, 2003, 20:22
9.
Re: No subject Feb 26, 2003, 20:22
Feb 26, 2003, 20:22
 


This comment was edited on Nov 13, 14:08.
14 Comments. 1 pages. Viewing page 1.
Newer [  1  ] Older