Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
Customize
User Settings
Styles:
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:

Regularly scheduled events

User information for Ulster

Real Name Ulster   
Search for:
 
Sort results:   Ascending Descending
Limit results:
 
 
 
Nickname None given.
Email Concealed by request
ICQ None given.
Description
Homepage http://
Signed On Feb 27, 2003, 01:11
Total Comments 13 (Suspect)
User ID 16301
 
User comment history
< Newer [ 1 ] Older >


News Comments > Oculus Facing Political Backlash [Updated]
65. Re: Oculus Facing Political Backlash [Updated] Sep 24, 2016, 09:08 Ulster
 
Slick wrote on Sep 24, 2016, 08:30:
Ulster wrote on Sep 24, 2016, 08:24:
Slick, you are definitely in one side of my 33% statement. You are just as bad as the people that you hurl crap at on the other side.

I see a wall of Blah Blah in your post, that started by passively aggressively calling the other side racists.

Like I said...this shit's gotta stop at some point.

Where did I call people racist? Trump IS a racist, he shouts it loudly and proudly, have you ever heard him speak? I'm not putting words in his mouth. Reporting verbatim on things a politician has said (repeatedly) is not somehow stooping to their level.

That's a bullshit comparison and you know it.

When people find the quality of racism to be an endearing quality in a candidate, guess what? They're probably racists.

And if you can't even be bothered to read what's being said, you really have nothing to gain by commenting on it.

Oh, I read it. Ironically I didn't have to read far at all: first two sentences: "It's really because the president for the last 8 years has been (half) black. That's really it"

That is calling folks racist and you know it. Like I said, you're no better than the other guys. Keep throwing the fire bombs.

 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Oculus Facing Political Backlash [Updated]
60. Re: Oculus Facing Political Backlash [Updated] Sep 24, 2016, 08:24 Ulster
 
Slick, you are definitely in one side of my 33% statement. You are just as bad as the people that you hurl crap at on the other side.

I see a wall of Blah Blah in your post, that started by passively aggressively calling the other side racists.

Like I said...this shit's gotta stop at some point.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Oculus Facing Political Backlash [Updated]
54. Re: Oculus Facing Political Backlash [Updated] Sep 24, 2016, 07:23 Ulster
 
There is little doubt that we are heading for real civil unrest. The signs are all there - the absolute and curious inability to find common ground, the wars against police, and the general hatred you see in threads like this all across the internet. You know, Trump supporters are retards and Hillary supporters are liars, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc.

How did we get to the point where 33% of our population hates another 33% of the same population to this degree? I can assure you that we in the remaining 34% are shaking our heads in disgust.

I swear, it's almost like trolling has become mainstream.

 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > DEFCON Patch
3. Re: No subject Oct 23, 2006, 16:32 Ulster
 
It was a very fun game for about 2 weeks. Then the new-ness wore off. It is still a nice game to play to kill 30 minutes.

For a bit over $10 I was really impressed.

 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Evening Tech Bits
2. Re: ati stream computing Sep 30, 2006, 10:52 Ulster
 
I disagree and this could actually be very good for gaming. This has the potential to use the GPU as a physics offload engine, for example. Pretty cool stuff.

 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > World of Warcraft Patches
4. Re: wow Sep 26, 2006, 16:30 Ulster
 
Me-thinks that Paul can't afford the monthly subscription and feels some anger over that.

Otherwise, running around screaming how much you don't like something reminds me a lot of Brick from "Anchorman"..."I love lamp".

edit: oops formatting wrong


This comment was edited on Sep 26, 16:31.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > AMD to Buy ATI
21. Re: FoxConn Jul 24, 2006, 11:47 Ulster
 
You guys are all thinking too short term. This has absolutely nothing to do with AMD wanting to sell Radeon's or chipsets. Long term, and I'm talking 3-5 years, GPU's will be DEAD. All graphics will be integrated into the CPU, where it can be done better and faster than on a GPU. Before you flame me for that comment, please do some homework first.

So, with GPU's being integrated into CPU's, it makes absolute sense for AMD to acquire the graphics know-how to make this happen. For ATI, the deal makes sense as it helps them survive past 5 years.

 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Hearts of Iron 2 Demo
5. Re: No subject Dec 16, 2004, 17:47 Ulster
 
I have been beta testing HOI2 for a few months. To state that they didn't change anything isn't true. The gameplay is very similar, but they overhauled the way just about everything is done. In some ways, HOI2 is more complex than HOI was. It's certainly a lot deeper.

I understand the Turbotax comment, but if you stick with the game and make it past the learning curve, you'll find MP games to be a great amount of fun. Think of it as getting a rebate after figuring out Turbotax :-)

 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Out of the Blue
3. Re: for Halsy ...CLASSIC ! Nov 13, 2004, 14:01 Ulster
 
LOL...I get a kick out of losers. Your guy lost because he is a pussy, and now all you can do is call Bush an asshole. ROFLMAO...enjoy the next four years!

 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Diplomacy & Squad Leader Games
6. Re: No subject Aug 4, 2004, 14:59 Ulster
 
Paradox does not create bargin bin RTS trash. These guys know strategy games. Europa Universalis and Hearts of Iron are some of the most complex and deep games on the market.

 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > On 64-bit UT2003
39. Re: You forget... Feb 27, 2003, 20:04 Ulster
 
To the person who suggested that backwards compatibility is not desired. In the business world, especially in the tough economic market we are in, businesses do not have the resources to go out and change all of their software. Additionally, you get a chicken and egg thing going. Developers don't want to create too much content because the hardware isn't in place and the market is small. While at the same time, users don't want to invest in hardware that isn't widely supported by software. Its a catch-22.

However, by building in backwards compatibility, AMD will actually SPEED up the process of 64 bit migration by giving end users the comfort factor of having the ability to run both new 64 bit applications as well as current applications. This in turn will give software developers a larger market of 64 bit computers and therefore will naturally develop software to support.

AMD will lead the 64 bit migration by using this approach.

 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > On 64-bit UT2003
38. Re: You forget... Feb 27, 2003, 19:56 Ulster
 
First, to the person who posted about the Barton. The Barton has a much larger cache.

Regarding the mention of a 2GB limitation in 32 bit computing, the limitation is actually 4GB. In 64 bit, the theoretical limitation is 2TB!

 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > On 64-bit UT2003
9. Re: No subject Feb 26, 2003, 20:22 Ulster
 


This comment was edited on Nov 13, 14:08.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
13 Comments. 1 pages. Viewing page 1.
< Newer [ 1 ] Older >


footer

Blue's News logo