Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
Customize
User Settings
Styles:
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:
Chicago, IL 11/17

Regularly scheduled events

User information for .

Real Name .   
Search for:
 
Sort results:   Ascending Descending
Limit results:
 
 
 
Nickname Beamer
Email Concealed by request - Send Mail
ICQ None given.
Description
Homepage None given.
Signed On Jan 9, 2003, 00:22
Total Comments 15968 (Ninja)
User ID 15739
 
User comment history
< Newer [ 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 ] Older >


News Comments > Far Cry 3: Blood Dragon for Free
7. Re: Far Cry 3: Blood Dragon for Free Nov 9, 2016, 14:23 Beamer
 
NegaDeath wrote on Nov 9, 2016, 12:21:
IMO way better than the base game it spawned from. Always found modern Far Cry games to have way too much padding. Blood Dragon shrinks it down to a more enjoyable ratio. And adds a bunch of neon and giant lizards with frikkin laser beams attached to their heads.

Mark IV style motherfucker!

Couldn't disagree more. I felt like they took out the good from the game and left bare bones that were really, really bare. On top of it, the plot felt less throwback and more generic, and the decision to go with an eye-searing red sky with pink and purple details wasn't fun. That was usually 5 minutes in an 80s movie, not a full 5 hours.

I adore FC3/FC4. Found this to be mostly just boring.
 
-------------
Music for the discerning:
http://www.deathwishinc.com
http://www.hydrahead.com
http://www.painkillerrecords.com
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Out of the Blue
102. Re: Out of the Blue Nov 9, 2016, 09:52 Beamer
 
I get the anger at the "Establishment," but this is just a bad idea all around.

In 1980 we elected Reagan. Reagan was a former celebrity whose biggest bit of policy was a drastic tax cut on the super wealthy. This freed up the unofficial salary cap on the super wealthy, who exploited this by stagnating wages for everyone else, offshoring jobs to give themselves higher bonuses and stock prices, etc. This resulted in a huge wealth inequality and left the middle class, in particular the blue collar worker, decimated.

So, to teach the establishment a lesson, we elected another celebrity who became a Republican whose biggest policy is to cut the taxes on the super wealthy.

I'm sure, this time around, it will be different. Hey, at least we did it out of anger this time.
 
-------------
Music for the discerning:
http://www.deathwishinc.com
http://www.hydrahead.com
http://www.painkillerrecords.com
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Win10 Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare Refund Over Player Counts?
18. Re: Win10 Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare Refund Over Player Counts? Nov 8, 2016, 15:12 Beamer
 
Creston wrote on Nov 8, 2016, 14:38:
Beamer wrote on Nov 8, 2016, 14:18:
So... I think it's safe to say at least 5 people bought it and have since been refunded! Maybe even 6!

I stand humbly corrected!

Rereading what I typed, I think it's probably easy to misconstrue my post as a total defense of this debacle, saying only 5 or 6 people have been refunded.

I'm happy you picked up on what I actually meant, haha.
 
-------------
Music for the discerning:
http://www.deathwishinc.com
http://www.hydrahead.com
http://www.painkillerrecords.com
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Win10 Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare Refund Over Player Counts?
16. Re: Win10 Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare Refund Over Player Counts? Nov 8, 2016, 14:18 Beamer
 
Creston wrote on Nov 8, 2016, 13:59:
NetHead wrote on Nov 8, 2016, 11:04:
I could gladly and righteously tear Microsoft a new one for countless things they've done.

Though still, I think it's only fair to point out in this case it apparently isn't their fault, or their awful store that I hope dies, but rather Activision who decided to prevent the players joining eachother's games.

Correct. Even so, it's quite hilarious that two people (apparently) bought it from the MS store.

Oh, come off it. It was 2 people looking for a game at that moment.

Even if you don't assume that it meant just that gametype, not everyone that bought the game were looking for a game at that moment. And even if that was the most common time to play, some of the buyers would be doing other things, at least a third (but up to two thirds) would still be playing SP before moving to MP.

So... I think it's safe to say at least 5 people bought it and have since been refunded! Maybe even 6!
 
-------------
Music for the discerning:
http://www.deathwishinc.com
http://www.hydrahead.com
http://www.painkillerrecords.com
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Evening Tech Bits
13. Re: Evening Tech Bits Nov 8, 2016, 10:40 Beamer
 
NetHead wrote on Nov 8, 2016, 07:15:
Beamer wrote on Nov 7, 2016, 21:46:
...Hell, I do high level corporate strategy and I think I can be replaced at some point. White collar jobs will disappear, too..

It's strange how many people don't realise that the less physical your job the easier it is for a computer you replace you. It's like they're stuck in an industrial age mentality.

Also the more one's job is about "thinking" rather than "lifting" it's not only easier to replace you but the performance benefit gained via computers is vastly greater.

This isn't a snipe at anyone, it's just strange how those with "thinking" or higher paying jobs think they're harder to replace.

It's so simple to break this down, a burger flipping/cooking machine can only flip and cook so many burgers in any amount of time (while requiring costly space consuming mechanical presence that needs to be scaled and must also be maintained). A "thinking" replacement doesn't have any such physical limitations or impediment so the performance improvement is comparably astronomical, while requiring zero space to replace the worker (hell your job/your entire profession/field could be replaced globally by cloud computing in a single server farm).

At the risk of sounding rude, anyone who thinks their "thinking" job is to difficult for computers to replace, either now or in the future, has their head in the sand. "Thinking" jobs you can't do are already being done by computers, incomprehensibly faster and better than you can imagine nevermind execute. The only one that isn't yet in danger of being replaced is the programmers themselves (certain kinds anyway, as there have been some advancements even in that area).

When last have you beaten a simple unbridled computer at a game of chess, what makes you think you'd do better when things that are more complicated with more to consider and remember, in situations that increasingly require interacting with other computers.

The problem isn't replacing "you", it's about the impact of replacing "you".


I disagree on the ease. We can replace most manual labor jobs today, it's just a matter of cost. Building a robot that can make McDonald's is easy. Warehouse jobs are already gone, as are many manufacturing.

A job like mine? Requires advanced AI we're nowhere near. Then it requires people trusting the AI to make complex decisions (note: I didn't say requires the AI to make it correctly, I said requires people to trust it.) And it requires someone to want to create an implement this, knowing it will render them redundant. It's a whole lot easier to make a choice to save on G&A for a bunch of employees at a factory you've never visited in the midwest, but not very easy to decide to make redundant yourself.

So of course it will happen, and yes, a lot of people feel that it will be blue collar only, but it will hit everything. It will start in the areas of least complexity, though. Repetitive manual tasks have already had it happen. Call centers have already been reduced with automation. AI will obliterate call centers beyond that soon.
 
-------------
Music for the discerning:
http://www.deathwishinc.com
http://www.hydrahead.com
http://www.painkillerrecords.com
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Evening Tech Bits
11. Re: Evening Tech Bits Nov 8, 2016, 09:26 Beamer
 
Prez wrote on Nov 8, 2016, 08:50:
Cutter wrote on Nov 7, 2016, 20:53:
This is a major issue, right? After all, our economies are based entirely on conspicuous consumption. So if estimates are correct that AI and robots can replace the vast majority of the workforce than what drives the economy? A universal guaranteed income is the bare minimum. Certainly not what would keep our lifestyle - as we're accustomed to it - happily chugging along. Short of having matter replicators a la Star Trek that eliminates the need for a consumption based economy this will likely end very badly, i.e. WWIII. Well, as the Chinese curse goes, may you live in interesting times.

There will always be someone who has to work on the machines that do the work though. Luckily I'm in that line of work now so I should be safe.

As the other guy said, can't say "always."

It wouldn't be too hard to build a machine that can service other machines.
 
-------------
Music for the discerning:
http://www.deathwishinc.com
http://www.hydrahead.com
http://www.painkillerrecords.com
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Out of the Blue
27. Re: Out of the Blue Nov 7, 2016, 21:49 Beamer
 
Mr. Tact wrote on Nov 7, 2016, 19:35:
Beamer wrote on Nov 7, 2016, 15:12:
Regardless, I doubt many are buying cars 10 years from now. Some Uberesque entities will own fleets. Want to go somewhere? Call a car, and an automated one will be there within minutes unless you live in the most remote, rural areas.
While I would certainly agree driver-less cars are making good strides, I'm pretty sure we won't live to see this level of driving automation. This is subject is actually an on and off again discussion with a buddy of mine. And I'm the pro automation guy. He talks about how every day when driving that he sees situations he doubts a driver-less car could deal with.

It will come... I think 10 years is overly optimistic.

If nearly every car on the road is AI, all communicating on a grid, 99% of those situations disappear.

For the rest? It won't be long before the computers react for better than the humans.
 
-------------
Music for the discerning:
http://www.deathwishinc.com
http://www.hydrahead.com
http://www.painkillerrecords.com
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Evening Tech Bits
2. Re: Evening Tech Bits Nov 7, 2016, 21:46 Beamer
 
Cutter wrote on Nov 7, 2016, 20:53:
This is a major issue, right? After all, our economies are based entirely on conspicuous consumption. So if estimates are correct that AI and robots can replace the vast majority of the workforce than what drives the economy? A universal guaranteed income is the bare minimum. Certainly not what would keep our lifestyle - as we're accustomed to it - happily chugging along. Short of having matter replicators a la Star Trek that eliminates the need for a consumption based economy this will likely end very badly, i.e. WWIII. Well, as the Chinese curse goes, may you live in interesting times.

I had this conversation with my parents the other day. They watched Dateline or 20/20 or whatever about robots and AI. I pointed out it's true. Even though the $15-minimum-wage-haters will tell you it will just mean that McDonald's is now robots, that's going to happen over the next decade, anyway. You'll be ordering from your smart phone.

Call centers? AI. Hell, I do high level corporate strategy and I think I can be replaced at some point. White collar jobs will disappear, too.

My mom finds this horrifying and wonders what we'll do. I hadn't heard Musk say this before, but it's the only option. Socialism. Pure socialism. Everyone gets $XXX dollars per year. No one works. Everyone is an artist or, in more honesty, everyone sits at home jerking off all day until humanity goes extinct from laziness.
 
-------------
Music for the discerning:
http://www.deathwishinc.com
http://www.hydrahead.com
http://www.painkillerrecords.com
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Legal Briefs
10. Re: Morning Legal Briefs Nov 7, 2016, 21:42 Beamer
 
descender wrote on Nov 7, 2016, 21:08:
Firstly, you can take that Project Veritas stuff and shove it. They have been repeatedly debunked and exposed as having faked their releases. That you would even mention it really shows questionable judgment in your sources of information.

Do you not understand that saying things like "take political bribes for the Clinton Foundation" is just "repeating the lie"? There is no proof of this. This is pure speculation. If there was ANY proof of this they would both be in jail.

My head is not buried in any sand. I'm just not naively offended something someone might have said once in a private conversation. If we released all of your email to the public, would you not be embarrassed by a single statement in it? To hold anyone to that standard is absurd and wrong.

You've seen hundreds of thousands of private conversations of hers and this gossipy nonsense is the best anyone can come up with. It's weak and desperate. She is going to be elected tomorrow. There is no smoking gun coming. Everything about her that could possibly be dug up has been, and it has been found lacking.

Being willing to believe all of the stories about Hillary with no convictions, but turning a blind eye to the biggest enemy this country has ever faced is ridiculous. There is a reason to blame Russia for things, they do them.

Dude, that guy listens to Alex Jones unironically, thinking he's the only one aware of what's "really" going on.
 
-------------
Music for the discerning:
http://www.deathwishinc.com
http://www.hydrahead.com
http://www.painkillerrecords.com
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Metaverse
7. Re: Morning Metaverse Nov 7, 2016, 18:18 Beamer
 
Phasenoise wrote on Nov 7, 2016, 18:14:
Edge has a nice engine. But a browser isn't just an engine and Edge is sub Firefox 3.x levels of usability.

It's getting better. Some things still drive me nuts, and in some places the forms won't work.

But I use multiple browsers. One is kind of general and business stuff. The other is messageboards and shopping. Both have many, many tabs.

Brave may be something I try. Not Chrome. Google pisses me off enough with ad tracking. The other night a friend texted me and asked me if I wanted to go to a store. 5 minutes later I watched a YouTube video on my desktop, on a browser I've never logged into Gmail with, and boom. Ad for that store. I'm now seeing the ads everywhere. Never went to the site, just had a friend text me the name of the store.

 
-------------
Music for the discerning:
http://www.deathwishinc.com
http://www.hydrahead.com
http://www.painkillerrecords.com
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Out of the Blue
16. Re: Out of the Blue Nov 7, 2016, 15:12 Beamer
 
Verno wrote on Nov 7, 2016, 14:55:
Hmm yes, the pleasure of car ownership where you pay a huge upfront cost, ongoing maintenance costs, fuel costs and insurance costs. Enjoy your day at the stealership. I am really hoping Tesla can upend that whole fucking industry because buying a car is the worst experience. An entire industry built around obscuring and obfuscating the true price of its product. I hate our cars and if we ever move back to the city I'm going to try to get rid of them. Unfortunately out in rural land its a no go.

I generally just say no to everything and stick to the price I wanted when I walked in. I'm sure you're a veteran by now but watch their bullshit etching/etc fees they always try to sneak in. I've never had a time where they didn't try to fuck me at the last minute on the paperwork, I think most people don't even read to the bill of sale in detail.

Totally.

Regardless, I doubt many are buying cars 10 years from now. Some Uberesque entities will own fleets. Want to go somewhere? Call a car, and an automated one will be there within minutes unless you live in the most remote, rural areas. Prices will go down significantly, pooling algorithms will offer options to make it very cheap without much additional waiting, and $5 to go somewhere and back is way better than $30k-$50k for something that spends the bulk of its life sitting in your garage.
 
-------------
Music for the discerning:
http://www.deathwishinc.com
http://www.hydrahead.com
http://www.painkillerrecords.com
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Consolidation
2. Re: Morning Consolidation Nov 7, 2016, 15:10 Beamer
 
jdreyer wrote on Nov 7, 2016, 13:57:
It Took 60 Hours and Over 32,000 Deaths For a Mario Maker Creator To Beat His Own Level.

Since Val JP uploaded the level, it's been attempted over 724,000 times, and cleared a grand total of 36 times. That's a completion rate of approximately 0.00497%.

I guess there are masochists out there that enjoy this sort of thing, but I sure ain't one of them.

I'm with you. I've spoken here about how, as I've gotten older, I've slid towards easier difficulty levels. Some games get this right, too, but making the only real change being that you take more damage (as opposed to giving enemies less health or making you more powerful, something that utterly destroys any AI enemies may have.)

But I was never really down for this kind of thing. Did you play Mario Sunshine? It had these parts where it put old style Mario levels into 3D, so you were doing 3D platforming. Couldn't get behind it - it was just so frustrating.
 
-------------
Music for the discerning:
http://www.deathwishinc.com
http://www.hydrahead.com
http://www.painkillerrecords.com
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Saturday Metaverse
2. Re: Saturday Metaverse Nov 6, 2016, 12:17 Beamer
 
Zarkonis wrote on Nov 6, 2016, 10:46:
Good. Because Fuckerberg would be short a few million if he did that to me.

I mean, given that you call him "Fuckerberg," I'm sure nothing will stop your irrational hatred, but if you read the article, you'll see a 3rd party wanted to do this and Facebook didn't allow them. This wasn't Facebook's plan. Facebook halted an insurance company's plan. And, like the plans in the US that ask you to plug in a device that monitors how safely you're driving, this was opt-in, offering higher discounts for allowing it.

Honestly, I think there's a direct correlation between people who think idiotic references like "M$" or "Fuckerberg" and making irate comments without reading the article.
 
-------------
Music for the discerning:
http://www.deathwishinc.com
http://www.hydrahead.com
http://www.painkillerrecords.com
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Out of the Blue
19. Re: Out of the Blue Nov 4, 2016, 15:53 Beamer
 
Burrito of Peace wrote on Nov 4, 2016, 15:13:
Cutter wrote on Nov 4, 2016, 13:44:
I don't know why people always go on about Lucas electrics.

Because they made an objectively terrible product. Your experience is the exception, not the rule. When I had my S2 E-Type, I was constantly chasing down shorts in it. Once I ripped all the Lucas crap out and replaced it, I never had another problem. My dad had a very similar experience with his Spitfire. Lucas is universally known for making shitty electrical components.

A friend of the family had an E-Type about a decade ago. We all made fun of the purchase, joking about how frequently they light on fire. He didn't find it overly funny, but c'mon, they did do it frequently but the odds were still low, right?

Right?

In under a year, with it being mostly a weekend car, it burnt to the ground.
 
-------------
Music for the discerning:
http://www.deathwishinc.com
http://www.hydrahead.com
http://www.painkillerrecords.com
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > No Cross-play for Infinite Warfare or Modern Warfare Remastered
11. Re: No Cross-play for Infinite Warfare or Modern Warfare Remastered Nov 4, 2016, 15:22 Beamer
 
ItBurn wrote on Nov 4, 2016, 14:14:
Jivaro wrote on Nov 4, 2016, 14:13:
Beamer wrote on Nov 4, 2016, 13:02:
So why would a game company go cross-platform? So PC users can tell console users what terrible people they are while destroying them less due to skill and more due to equipment?

That tends to be my bottom line as well. At the end of the day not everybody enjoys gaming the same way. If two different ways of gaming are successful monetarily, I wouldn't think you (as a developer or publisher) would be anxious to do anything that might upset that balance....regardless of what the actual gamers say. The sales numbers tell the story better than any forum thread full of the vocal minority might. At least from a certain point of view. We all find that many of the truths we cling to depend greatly on our own point of view.




Sure, but remember that this news story is about Win10 store PC vs regular PC. Not xbox vs pc.

Oh man, that's so non-intuitive I didn't even pick it up.

In the old days, Steam didn't play well with non-Steam, but... yeah. Wow. Can only play with people who buy from the same store. In other words, at least 65% of the people that buy from the Windows store will want a refund when they realize they can't play against 99% of PC buyers.
 
-------------
Music for the discerning:
http://www.deathwishinc.com
http://www.hydrahead.com
http://www.painkillerrecords.com
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > No Cross-play for Infinite Warfare or Modern Warfare Remastered
7. Re: No Cross-play for Infinite Warfare or Modern Warfare Remastered Nov 4, 2016, 13:02 Beamer
 
ItBurn wrote on Nov 4, 2016, 11:22:
ldonyo wrote on Nov 4, 2016, 10:52:
I can see Activision not allowing cross-play so that people are forced to buy multiple copies of their games if they want to play with/against others on multiple platforms. I can also see EA doing the same thing for the same reasons.

It's going to take a publisher with some guts, or an independent with some fairly deep pockets, to take a chance that cross-play will net them increased sales by capturing new customers that are willing to buy a game that they can play with all of their friends, not just ones on a particular platform.

I can see someone like CD Projekt Red doing this with a Witcher title and garnering not only a ton of goodwill from gamers, but a ton of sales, as well.

Publishers aren't THAT evil, I think. It's probably a budget-linked technical limitation or incompetence that brought them to this. I expect that this case is an exception and that crossplay(win10 x steam) will be enabled later following backlash.

They're not that evil, and they're smart enough to know more people would buy to play with their friends that wouldn't otherwise buy than would buy multiple times to play with multiple groups.

Again, though, nearly every person here has disdain for console users. And, unanimously, every person here feels that an average m+k user could go toe to toe, or even beat, or even destroy, the best controller user.

So why would a game company go cross-platform? So PC users can tell console users what terrible people they are while destroying them less due to skill and more due to equipment?
 
-------------
Music for the discerning:
http://www.deathwishinc.com
http://www.hydrahead.com
http://www.painkillerrecords.com
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Activision Blizzard Financials
11. Re: Activision Blizzard Financials Nov 4, 2016, 07:04 Beamer
 
NKD wrote on Nov 4, 2016, 04:53:
{PH}88fingers wrote on Nov 3, 2016, 22:52:

that escalated quickly..

Yeah, well, people who don't click through to the article and then make posts that couldn't be made by anyone who actually read it are a pet peeve of mine.

It's the internet, so you expect people to have strong opinions on subjects they know nothing about, but complaining about missing content in a report you didn't even read is a lot more ridiculous.

In truth, his confusion wouldn't bother me that much if he didn't act like Blizzard were the incompetent ones.

 
-------------
Music for the discerning:
http://www.deathwishinc.com
http://www.hydrahead.com
http://www.painkillerrecords.com
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Out of the Blue
36. Re: Out of the Blue Nov 3, 2016, 22:16 Beamer
 
RedEye9 wrote on Nov 3, 2016, 22:01:
Beamer wrote on Nov 3, 2016, 21:38:

You forgot the SJWs. He also blamed the SJWs. A grown man discussing SJWs is a site to behold, as well.

In reality, there's shared blame for an unexpected child. No one ever says it's the man's fault, which is why the man isn't expected to do all the support. But, since it's shared blame, the woman can't be expected to, either, and if the man isn't fulfilling his part, that's his fault and off to jail he goes.

I see this SJW thing everywhere, it seems to be the go to thing to blame everything on, especially for people that can't think.
What does it even mean, Southern Jingoistic Witches?

They'll tell you it means people that sit around on the internet whining about social issues without ever doing anything, ignoring that they're people sitting around on the internet whining about social issues without ever doing anything, but then they'll complain that SJWs are people out there doing things to change the world.

By and large, though, "SJWs" are 13 year old girls trying to find their identity by rebelling on Tumblr, and for some reason men from 20-30 find these posts that have 2 or 3 likes and assume they're the end of humanity.
 
-------------
Music for the discerning:
http://www.deathwishinc.com
http://www.hydrahead.com
http://www.painkillerrecords.com
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Activision Blizzard Financials
2. Re: Activision Blizzard Financials Nov 3, 2016, 21:39 Beamer
 
Timmeh wrote on Nov 3, 2016, 21:35:
i probably didnt read this right,,, but..

can we get some freaking FINANCIAL data in your FINANCIAL report and not bullshit numbers of how many people have played your online game?


I mean, read the article. Blue mentions their digital revenue, and that they had record operating income, earnings per share, and operating cash flow. He then highlighted the audience reach, which is not a financial metric, because he felt that was more interesting to people here.

So yes, you did not read it right, and you called it bullshit due to your own fault.
 
-------------
Music for the discerning:
http://www.deathwishinc.com
http://www.hydrahead.com
http://www.painkillerrecords.com
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Out of the Blue
34. Re: Out of the Blue Nov 3, 2016, 21:38 Beamer
 
Quboid wrote on Nov 3, 2016, 18:06:
Dacote wrote on Nov 3, 2016, 12:35:
Beamer wrote on Nov 3, 2016, 07:00:
jdreyer wrote on Nov 3, 2016, 00:23:
So, uh, what went down while I was away? Why all the removed comments?

I think I made the mistake of quoting something I should have know better than to quote.
Me too.

I think so. It's rather a shame it was so angry because the stupidity was something to behold. Cutter's cousin went to jail for not paying child support and who does Cutter blame? People who always blame other people rather than take responsibility for their own actions. Seriously. Also, racism. Of course.

You forgot the SJWs. He also blamed the SJWs. A grown man discussing SJWs is a site to behold, as well.

In reality, there's shared blame for an unexpected child. No one ever says it's the man's fault, which is why the man isn't expected to do all the support. But, since it's shared blame, the woman can't be expected to, either, and if the man isn't fulfilling his part, that's his fault and off to jail he goes.
 
-------------
Music for the discerning:
http://www.deathwishinc.com
http://www.hydrahead.com
http://www.painkillerrecords.com
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
15968 Comments. 799 pages. Viewing page 33.
< Newer [ 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 ] Older >




Blue's News is a participant in Amazon Associates programs
and earns advertising fees by linking to Amazon.



footer

Blue's News logo