Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
Customize
User Settings
Styles:
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:
Germany 08/31
Chicago, IL USA, IL 10/19

Regularly scheduled events

User information for .

Real Name .   
Search for:
 
Sort results:   Ascending Descending
Limit results:
 
 
 
Nickname Beamer
Email Concealed by request - Send Mail
ICQ None given.
Description
Homepage None given.
Signed On Jan 9, 2003, 00:22
Total Comments 17135 (Ninja)
User ID 15739
 
User comment history
< Newer [ 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 ] Older >


News Comments > The Battle for Star Control Continues
10. Re: The Battle for Star Control Continues Dec 6, 2017, 10:49 Beamer
 
Creston wrote on Dec 6, 2017, 10:47:
Ah, I see what you're saying.

Yeah I don't get the hate for the new Xcoms either. They're awesome games, and exist quite happily alongside the old ones. People are weird.

I think this is why I'm excited for 2 StarCons. Confused why we're getting 2 now, but we had a ton of XCOM remakes, and XCOM spiritual successors, before we finally got something worthy of being XCOM.

With 2 StarCons, odds are pretty good 1 will be worthwhile. Maybe both!
Now if only JA2 could get this love.
 
-------------
Music for the discerning:
http://www.deathwishinc.com
http://www.hydrahead.com
http://www.painkillerrecords.com
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > The Battle for Star Control Continues
8. Re: The Battle for Star Control Continues Dec 6, 2017, 09:50 Beamer
 
Creston wrote on Dec 6, 2017, 09:33:
Beamer wrote on Dec 6, 2017, 08:21:
Numinar wrote on Dec 6, 2017, 08:07:
a game willing to let you fail after dozens of hours invested, like the OG Xcom. Absolute classic.

Have you played the new XCOMs? They do that, too?

Fail after dozens of hours? Oh shit yeah. That Avatar clock is merciless, as are the Chosen. When they come to attack your base, and you don't have a force capable of stopping them, they will gank you and it's bye bye. And this can happen after an easy 20 to 30 hours (it takes a while anyway, since the Chosen have to build up intel before they track down your base.)

Oh! I didn't mean the question mark. I was trying to point out that you don't need to specify "OG XCOM" because they ALL do that. Specifying "OG XCOM" sounds to me like someone hasn't played the new ones, but that's also because I can't fathom someone who loved the old ones hating the new ones. I know people do, but it's kind of mindblowing to me. Personally, I find them to be excellent chapters of the franchise and to have completely replaced my need to play the original (which I've still done a few times, it has some aspects that the new ones don't that I really like, but man, the interface is painful and the late game of giant UFOs everywhere gets so tedious.)

I did XCOM2 on Medium or so, then Ironman on Easy. Never had an issue with them, but I'm ok with that, I actually don't want to lose after hours of investment, so no ramping up difficulty for me, even if I sacrifice XCOM cred. I did want to have to mourn the occasional squadie, but Easy is so Easy that I actually lost fewer squaddies on Easy Ironman than Medium Regular (I think it was 1 to 3.)
 
-------------
Music for the discerning:
http://www.deathwishinc.com
http://www.hydrahead.com
http://www.painkillerrecords.com
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Into the Black
15. Re: Into the Black Dec 6, 2017, 09:31 Beamer
 
Pigeon wrote on Dec 6, 2017, 08:54:
Their complaint about Dark Knight can pretty much be said about every movie and TV show where a character is using trickery or cunning to advance the plot. Yes Stranger Things is a love letter to 80’s childhood/coming of age movies, but it’s a really well written love letter. Honestly I was never aware Django was in the running for best Tarantino movie. I enjoyed it in the way I enjoy most Tarantino movies, as an over the top spectacle. Pulp Fiction, reservoir dogs and Kill Bill all rate better IMO. And bitching about Back to the Future not being realistic… Okay someone needs to pull the stick out of their ass and learn to enjoy things for what they are.

Inglorious Bastards, for me, hands down. No question at all. It's also arguably the least Tarantino film of all the Tarantino films, and that may not be a coincidence for my opinion.
 
-------------
Music for the discerning:
http://www.deathwishinc.com
http://www.hydrahead.com
http://www.painkillerrecords.com
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > The Battle for Star Control Continues
5. Re: The Battle for Star Control Continues Dec 6, 2017, 08:21 Beamer
 
Numinar wrote on Dec 6, 2017, 08:07:
a game willing to let you fail after dozens of hours invested, like the OG Xcom. Absolute classic.

Have you played the new XCOMs? They do that, too?
 
-------------
Music for the discerning:
http://www.deathwishinc.com
http://www.hydrahead.com
http://www.painkillerrecords.com
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Into the Black
13. Re: Into the Black Dec 6, 2017, 07:55 Beamer
 
Blue wrote on Dec 6, 2017, 00:41:
MoreLuckThanSkill wrote on Dec 5, 2017, 23:09:
Some of them are a bit of a stretch.. you're telling me Django wasn't arguably Tarantino's best film? That Scarface wasn't amazing for the time period?

As I said, I surprised myself by how much of the list I agreed with, so I'll offer my take on yours.

For me, Django is memorable for Christoph Waltz's magnetism, but I mostly didn't like it. It's not as bad a Hateful Eight, but it's probably second-to-worst for me (you know, except for Quentin's brilliant acting turn as Australian Frankenstein). Unarguably Pulp Fiction was my favorite of his. This pales by comparison.

And I *hate* Scarface. There, I said it. It's hard for me to go through more than five minutes of an DePalma film and not be annoyed, and this is no different. A bunch of Italians playing Cubans and the first hint of Pacino's eventual descent into his over-the-top phase? No thanks.

Then there's Full Metal Jacket! How the hell can you not like the second half of FMJ!?! Instantly disqualifies this whole list. :o

There are parts of the second half that were memorable, like Animal Mother (and the hooker quotes in the post after yours), but the in-country parts felt off to me, and it being so distinctly separated from the gripping first part helped emphasize the disjointed feel. Perhaps that's what Kubrick was shooting for, but it makes me feel like someone needed to mold all the cool things that happened in the movie into more of a story. Also, the Battle of Hue was important, but showing urban warfare in Vietnam seems odd (and feels like a cop-out, knowing Kubrick would never travel to the jungle to shoot on location).

Haven't seen Get Out.

Agreed. Django was entertaining, but because of Waltz.

And FMJ, when I saw it I was in HS, and remember the harsh transition being the entire point. War sucks. That part of the movie largely sucks. But that doesn't make it a particularly rewatchable half of the film.
 
-------------
Music for the discerning:
http://www.deathwishinc.com
http://www.hydrahead.com
http://www.painkillerrecords.com
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Evening Legal Briefs
3. Re: Evening Legal Briefs Dec 6, 2017, 07:51 Beamer
 
LittleMe wrote on Dec 6, 2017, 07:04:
Good. Down with NN and the ruthlessly evil corporations who back it.
Hey, remember that time you said Flat Earthers make some good points?

Did you ever respond to explain why all of your most passionate views align with conspiracy theories? Have you ever thought about that and internalized why you always go against the grain, assuming the information from the smallest source with the least evidence must be "truth" and everything else is an attempt to manipulate you?
 
-------------
Music for the discerning:
http://www.deathwishinc.com
http://www.hydrahead.com
http://www.painkillerrecords.com
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Metaverse
5. Re: Morning Metaverse Dec 6, 2017, 07:51 Beamer
 
Bub wrote on Dec 6, 2017, 07:28:
Yea let's see, dump an extra workload,(with no additional compensation) on a wide swath of employees, give them gatekeeper status, sure, no way those lowbies might take bribes from nefarious site owners to promote their sites.

That's not how it works. That's not how any of this works.
 
-------------
Music for the discerning:
http://www.deathwishinc.com
http://www.hydrahead.com
http://www.painkillerrecords.com
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Who Controls Star Control?
43. Re: Who Controls Star Control? Dec 6, 2017, 07:18 Beamer
 
Mashiki Amiketo wrote on Dec 5, 2017, 01:05:
Beamer wrote on Dec 4, 2017, 13:50:
You're an opportunistic troll. 1 person here said the sexual harassment thing, and was corrected by 5.

Still you cry.
Troll = stuff you don't like because it hurts your feelings. Even more so when it's ideologically in your camp, and it's shitty people being shitty. And instead of actually dealing with that problem you'd rather not dispute that, rather it's all deflect, deflect, deflect.

Maybe you can go find some trendy cause to go virtue signal over and show you're a great ally.

I told him he was wrong, I don't have a camp, and it's hard to imagine anyone with less humanity than you.

What is shittier than no humanity? You can't even imagine empathy with others, hence your idiot MRA buzzwords like virtue signal. Are you so miserable with who you are?
 
-------------
Music for the discerning:
http://www.deathwishinc.com
http://www.hydrahead.com
http://www.painkillerrecords.com
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Star Control Rights Follow-up
14. Re: Star Control Rights Follow-up Dec 5, 2017, 17:02 Beamer
 
jdreyer wrote on Dec 5, 2017, 15:35:
Beamer wrote on Dec 5, 2017, 13:43:
Mgshadow wrote on Dec 5, 2017, 13:04:
Im with you, Brad is being very careful with his wording and attitude. I feel he has done nothing wrong. No finger pointing or anything.

I don't think either has done anything wrong, though Brad is clearly much more savvy in these regards (which seems like a duh, given that he also retails.)

Until there's proof, Brad isn't doing anything wrong. But the lack of proof doesn't mean that Toys for Bob is wrong, either. But it does mean they're less actionable. Rights issues like this, where it isn't clear who has what, are fairly common.

What's your take on why they aren't providing the docs to Stardock? They don't have them, and they're trying to use social pressure to get Stardock to relinquish rights for free?

That they were probably crap at record keeping.

Even if they have the documents, they don't necessarily prove anything Atari could told each something different. I think both are acting in good faith, but think only one has been through this before and knows how to handle the situation, and both should be willing to make a reasonable deal.

Honestly, I'd like to see an arrangement where Stardock keeps the games up, both sides get the name with Stardock forced to use a longer title and not just Star Control (:Origins may work, or Star Control Legacy, or whatever), and both get some of the races but Toys for Bob gets the main storyline and main races whereas Stardock needs to branch out more and new.

Seems like that'd be fair to most. Frankly, I don't know how much real value there is in the races, anyway. What percentage of people who will buy this are very familiar with StarCon2?
 
-------------
Music for the discerning:
http://www.deathwishinc.com
http://www.hydrahead.com
http://www.painkillerrecords.com
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Star Control Rights Follow-up
5. Re: Star Control Rights Follow-up Dec 5, 2017, 13:43 Beamer
 
Mgshadow wrote on Dec 5, 2017, 13:04:
Im with you, Brad is being very careful with his wording and attitude. I feel he has done nothing wrong. No finger pointing or anything.

I don't think either has done anything wrong, though Brad is clearly much more savvy in these regards (which seems like a duh, given that he also retails.)

Until there's proof, Brad isn't doing anything wrong. But the lack of proof doesn't mean that Toys for Bob is wrong, either. But it does mean they're less actionable. Rights issues like this, where it isn't clear who has what, are fairly common.
 
-------------
Music for the discerning:
http://www.deathwishinc.com
http://www.hydrahead.com
http://www.painkillerrecords.com
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Out of the Blue
23. Re: Out of the Blue Dec 5, 2017, 09:51 Beamer
 
jdreyer wrote on Dec 5, 2017, 01:23:
Mashiki Amiketo wrote on Dec 5, 2017, 01:13:
SimplyMonk wrote on Dec 4, 2017, 16:57:

I mean... Rey is probably a better role model than most other women portrayed in film or TV.
The character is a literal mary sue, that gains the ability to do super things without having to put in the effort to get there. It doesn't get any worse for a role model, in trying to teach any kid that you can become excellent if you simply suddenly gain some form of "specialness" You want good role models from the star wars universe? The exile is a good example.

There are far better role models in movies then Rey, far better in TV. Hell you'd be better off handing a young girl the "wheel of time" novels and letting them see how flawed characters, who through hard work can achieve great things even by trial and error.

Yeah, that movie is terrible, and her magical powers are a big part of that. I rewatched a couple of weeks ago since the new movie is coming out (and I have high hopes, b/c Rian Johnson is amazing) and I still hate it. "Oh, but the characters have chemistry and charisma!" Fuck that, the plot is derivative of the earlier movies, and the story is a series of unbelievable coincidences.

I understand that Disney is so high on the upcoming movie that they're letting Johnson pen a brand new trilogy from scratch. High praise indeed, and I hope their trust is well-placed.

Don't encourage him. He just wants to use the word "Mary Sue." If Rey was a male he'd be ok with it.
 
-------------
Music for the discerning:
http://www.deathwishinc.com
http://www.hydrahead.com
http://www.painkillerrecords.com
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Who Controls Star Control?
35. Re: Who Controls Star Control? Dec 4, 2017, 15:57 Beamer
 
jdreyer wrote on Dec 4, 2017, 15:36:
Numinar wrote on Dec 4, 2017, 08:12:
theyarecomingforyou wrote on Dec 4, 2017, 06:47:
It's worth noting that Brad Wardell is famous for sexually harassing a female employee, sending her a 'sexual purity test', making unwanted sexual contact, telling sexist and vulgar jokes and violating her private life. When she filed a lawsuit he then manufactured a counter-suit to destroy her credibility. It ended with a behind the scenes settlement that involved the woman publicly apologising but it's pretty obvious he paid her off.

Unsurprisingly for someone obsessed with sexual purity he is also a devout conservative famous for boycotting UPS after they withdrew advertising from Fox News due to Glenn Beck making racist and derogatory remarks about Obama.

Put simply he's a bit of an arsehole and it wouldn't surprise me one bit if the allegations made by the original developers are entirely true.

It fucking sucks. These women stay quiet as making a complaint no matter how vaild makes you poisonous to litigation phobic corporations who find it easier to keep the lecherous creeps they employ or answer to happy than handle complaints properly. You take the money because your chances of getting another job are greatly reduced so unless you are independently wealthy there is no profit in sticking to your guns.

Though who knows, maybe she was gold digging through litigation and he in an innocent conservative wanker? Seems less likely and certainly not profitable long term.


If women had just stayed in the home, none of this would have happened.

/S

Nicely, the whole idea of women staying quiet to avoid being blacklisted (which was absolutely a real thing) is rapidly draining away.

And while I feel women deserve the benefit of the doubt, and very few make it up, it does seem like there's some evidence that this woman made it up to cover for having been caught with other wrong-doings. I'm not saying I'm fully convinced and therefore ok smearing her (predominantly because I haven't looked into it particularly hard), but I'm also ok saying Brad shouldn't have this held against him. The circumstances are about as clear as they can possibly be in his case. If this doesn't clear a name, not much can.
 
-------------
Music for the discerning:
http://www.deathwishinc.com
http://www.hydrahead.com
http://www.painkillerrecords.com
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Who Controls Star Control?
28. Re: Who Controls Star Control? Dec 4, 2017, 13:50 Beamer
 
Mashiki Amiketo wrote on Dec 4, 2017, 13:28:
Creston wrote on Dec 4, 2017, 11:10:

That case was dismissed with prejudice. Iow, it's 99.9999% likely that she made all that shit up in an effort to extort money from her previous employer.

If you base all your decisions regarding stardock on that, you have a supremely sad world view. Let's hope for your sake nobody ever makes a false sexual harassment claim against Chris Roberts, hmm?
It's funny just how much the lie that Wardell sexually harassed someone is still making the rounds. The thing you forgot was: Not only was it dismissed with prejudice against the complainant, but she stole and destroyed corporate information belonging to Stardock. And the judge required her to write a public apology for the false claim. She's lucky she wasn't criminally prosecuted for that stunt and for the destruction of property. I believe Wardell's own words were something close to "the sooner she's out of the lives of our employees the better we'll all be."

It wasin't 99.9999% that she made it up. She 100% made it up. Ordering a claimant to publicly apologize is almost unheard of, and is considered a "confession of guilt." Meaning Wardell could have filed civil and criminally against her, and she'd be 100% screwed.

But it's the same old bullshit, "what about those special snowflake women who need all that protection!" You mean like the female developer who along with her husband were effectively run out of every "help girls get into tech" program because they refused to bow to feminist dogma, and that same group then started spreading lies in order to ruin her reputation. Oh and for some of the reasons they wanted to all "boys who need help or wanted to learn to code" into the programs, along with socially disadvantaged people. The group FYI was and is backed by google. Enjoy the next lawsuit on thins because it's gonna be really good fun.

Oh, and to the various people who said hur-dur-dur that list a few weeks back was bullshit. Are you enjoying it now? Because there's more to come. I'd also suggest some of you avoid looking at your childhood idols when the next group drops.

You're an opportunistic troll. 1 person here said the sexual harassment thing, and was corrected by 5.

Still you cry.
 
-------------
Music for the discerning:
http://www.deathwishinc.com
http://www.hydrahead.com
http://www.painkillerrecords.com
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Who Controls Star Control?
19. Re: Evening Mobilization Dec 4, 2017, 10:25 Beamer
 
Yeah, I think Brad is an somewhat awful person, but I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt on that case.  
-------------
Music for the discerning:
http://www.deathwishinc.com
http://www.hydrahead.com
http://www.painkillerrecords.com
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Evening Metaverse
21. Re: Evening Metaverse Dec 3, 2017, 09:25 Beamer
 
Ben Shapiro is wrong, and trying to manipulate you. You're falling for it.

Do you know any Muslims? Have you spent any time at all in a Muslim country, other than as a military presence?

I doubt it.
 
-------------
Music for the discerning:
http://www.deathwishinc.com
http://www.hydrahead.com
http://www.painkillerrecords.com
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Out of the Blue
58. Re: Out of the Blue Dec 1, 2017, 21:03 Beamer
 
Blue wrote on Dec 1, 2017, 20:06:
Beamer wrote on Dec 1, 2017, 18:40:
I put Rodgers and Favre above Starr.

The formatting was messed up, but that was you, right? Anyway, whoever said it, I still disagree. Rodgers is probably the best *passer* I've ever seen, but here's a little from Wikipedia about Bart Starr, the only QB in the playoff era to three-peat, who played during a time when QBs called their own plays and the passing game was impeded by the rights of defensive backs to mug receivers all over the field:

Starr was the only quarterback in history to lead a team to five league championships (1961–62, 1965–67), before Tom Brady tied the record during the 2016 season. Starr led his team to victories in two Super Bowls: I and II. As the Packers' head coach, he was less successful, compiling a 52–76–3 (.408) record from 1975 through 1983.

Starr was named the Most Valuable Player of the first two Super Bowls and earned four Pro Bowl selections. He was inducted into the Pro Football Hall of Fame and the Packers Hall of Fame in 1977. He won the league MVP award in 1966.[1]

Starr has the highest postseason passer rating (104.8)[2] of any quarterback in NFL history and a postseason record of 9–1. His career completion percentage of 57.4 was an NFL best when he retired in 1972.[3] Starr also held the Packers' franchise record for games played (196) for 32 years, through the 2003 season.[3]

IMO, that final paragraph should be enough to win this debate.

I'll openly admit I am not the best person to be grading Green Bay QBs, particularly ones I never saw personally.
 
-------------
Music for the discerning:
http://www.deathwishinc.com
http://www.hydrahead.com
http://www.painkillerrecords.com
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Out of the Blue
56. Re: Out of the Blue Dec 1, 2017, 18:40 Beamer
 
Blue wrote on Dec 1, 2017, 17:54:
Creston wrote on Dec 1, 2017, 16:18:
Cutter wrote on Nov 30, 2017, 17:32:
Rodgers is arguably the best QB of all time.

Ooooh errrr missus.

I mean, come on. It's not as if Tom Brady is not even playing anymore. That said, Aaron Rodgers is definitely better than Eli Manning. I think Aaron Rodgers is probably better than Peyton Manning.


I put Rodgers and Favre above Starr.

Marino above them all, and he never won anything! Which excludes him from being best ever, but man, what makes him so fascinating to me is how far he always was from winning.
Rodgers isn't even the best QB in the history of the Packers. That would be Bart Starr.
 
-------------
Music for the discerning:
http://www.deathwishinc.com
http://www.hydrahead.com
http://www.painkillerrecords.com
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Consolidation
3. Re: Morning Tech Bits Dec 1, 2017, 14:38 Beamer
 
Mordecai Walfish wrote on Dec 1, 2017, 13:43:
RedEye9 wrote on Dec 1, 2017, 12:22:
30 is the new 60
PUBG Will Run At 30 FPS On All Xbox One Devices, PlayerUnknown Clarifies

Would it really make any sense to make the playing field uneven by having people with a 60fps advantage over the "basic version" peasantry? I could see why they would want to have parity here. Resolution is not as big a deal, but double the framerate is massive, even on the consoles with their less-precise gamepad controls.

Y'know, I would love for someone to do a test, pitting people on consoles running at 60fps to ones running at 30fps, swapping them a few times, to actually see the impact. I don't know if I agree that, on a TV far away and a game not super quick, it'd make a monstrous difference.
 
-------------
Music for the discerning:
http://www.deathwishinc.com
http://www.hydrahead.com
http://www.painkillerrecords.com
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Out of the Blue
39. Re: Out of the Blue Nov 30, 2017, 23:29 Beamer
 
I read an article today that said Eli was the best B-tier QB ever. I agree with that. He wasn't a superstar, franchise QB. He was a dependable QB. The best dependable QB. A guy who could come up huge when he needed to, and be frustrating nearly every other time. You could rarely count on Eli to pick a game on his shoulders and simply will victory the way Rodgers, or Peyton, or Brady, or Elway, or Marino, or Montana. Except in the playoffs. Especially the Superbowl.

I respected a lot about him, but the parts I respected were usually not the things I valued most. He was a loyal, respectable company man, with zero personality. He stuck by his teammates, he took blame and rarely assigned it, and his cool head almost definitely kept the hotter flames on the team in check. But good god was he a boring lump of mud that you could only rely on when you absolutely needed to rely on him.

Everyone points out he wouldn't be in HoF discussion if not for being on a big team, but he was, including the additional pressure that comes with that. And he wouldn't be if he didn't make two key drives to bring him two rings. But he did. Best B-tier QB ever. I'd argue he's the worst multiple-ring QBs of at least my lifetime, but that's not a bad thing. Not at all. And man, he won two of the best Superbowls of all time.
 
-------------
Music for the discerning:
http://www.deathwishinc.com
http://www.hydrahead.com
http://www.painkillerrecords.com
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Out of the Blue
26. Re: Out of the Blue Nov 30, 2017, 18:37 Beamer
 
Blue wrote on Nov 30, 2017, 17:04:
Beamer wrote on Nov 30, 2017, 16:05:
And he'll probably get traded away with Eli, and next season will be Geno with some top 5 pick rookie behind him, moments away from passing him in the depth chart.

Eli has two years left on a contract with a no-trade clause. I'd put it at about 50/50 that he gets released as a thank you for his service that allows him to find his own landing spot.

Maybe, but with the $5M bonus coming to him in March, we'll see. I don't know if he gets more than he's making on the open market, so it may be worth his while to allow a trade. In any case, we'll know by early March at the latest.

I would say there's, at best, a 20% chance he's on the team next year. Reese and McAdoo are gone, but I can't imagine it's worthwhile for Eli to stay or the Giants to keep him.
 
-------------
Music for the discerning:
http://www.deathwishinc.com
http://www.hydrahead.com
http://www.painkillerrecords.com
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
17135 Comments. 857 pages. Viewing page 31.
< Newer [ 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 ] Older >


footer

Blue's News logo