Scottish Martial Arts wrote on Jun 12, 2016, 20:53:TangledThorns wrote on Jun 12, 2016, 19:14:
Keeping you up to current events as ISIS did claim responsibility!
And where is that being reported? Scanning the headlines, all I'm seeing is that the shooter called 911 immediately prior to the attack to proclaim loyalty to ISIS. It should go without saying that you do not actually have to have been recruited/trained/equipped/coordinated by anyone to make such a phone call.
RedEye9 wrote on Jun 12, 2016, 19:15:TangledThorns wrote on Jun 12, 2016, 19:09:Riiight. Because our current system is working great.RedEye9 wrote on Jun 12, 2016, 16:57:
It will take many more senseless deaths and a smart politician before we get gun laws similar to Australia.
Or like France's? We all saw how that worked out for them last year in Paris! Friggin' lemmings believing whats best for the rest of us.
Done any critical thinking lately, I thought not.
mag wrote on Jun 12, 2016, 15:37:D-Rock wrote on Jun 12, 2016, 15:18:The Half Elf wrote on Jun 12, 2016, 15:05}:
How the fuck was a Islamic terrorist attack?
There is NOTHING beyond his name and the color of his skin to suggest it. Any fucktard with internet access can "praise the attack" but not a single group has claimed the attack as their own.
ISIS claimed responsibility for it and it was well known prior to your posting. Do some research moron.
1) ISIS can claim responsibility for whatever the fuck it wants, after the fact. That doesn't mean it actually had anything to do with it.
2) ISIS did not claim responsibility.
3) This guy did apparently proclaim loyalty to ISIS, per CNN.
RedEye9 wrote on Jun 12, 2016, 16:57:
It will take many more senseless deaths and a smart politician before we get gun laws similar to Australia.
DangerDog wrote on Jun 7, 2016, 16:28:
The same club will be used to revive teammates.
theglaze wrote on Apr 29, 2016, 17:43:Wash Washburne wrote on Apr 29, 2016, 12:17:NegaDeath wrote on Apr 29, 2016, 11:25:
Assuming the WW1 rumors don't pan out I'd love to see a return to Vietnam now that modern technology can do jungle & forests realistically. I miss the music playing from the vehicles.
Battlefield: Bad Company-Vietnam perhaps?
Would be nice to see the re-spark of the Bad Company 2 vibe.
Put me down as another vote for Bad Company 2 vibe.TangledThorns wrote on Apr 29, 2016, 16:41:
I'm hoping the next game will support 128 players but I doubt it'll happen.
The problem I have with this and where I think they started to go wrong with BF3 and off the rails with BF4, is that an INDIVIDUAL cannot influence those big public game servers like one could do in Bad Company 2.
In BC2, I could have a truly heroic moment by somehow saving and MCOMM station from blowing up at the last second, or getting a plant when there was almost no time left. And the entire server then descends into frantic chaos towards the objective.
With 64 player servers or larger, either:
A. The map is simply too large with empty space, and zones of combat are disconnected with significant travel time required to get there.
B. There end up being 10 snipers on the other and ANYONE caught in dead-mans-land that isn't moving around like an erratic butterfly gets drilled in the head.
There's a balance between squad and individual tactics, infantry and vehicles, heroics and stalemate.
And Bad Company 2 hit that perfectly, compared to what has become of the franchise.