Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
Customize
User Settings
Styles:
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:
San Diego, CA 07/23

Regularly scheduled events

User information for Yifes

Real Name Yifes   
Search for:
 
Sort results:   Ascending Descending
Limit results:
 
 
 
Nickname Yifes
Email Concealed by request - Send Mail
ICQ None given.
Description
Homepage http://
Signed On Nov 21, 2002, 00:39
Total Comments 1000 (Pro)
User ID 15316
 
User comment history
< Newer [ 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 ] Older >


News Comments > StarCraft II Trailer
9. Re: StarCraft II Trailer Jul 22, 2010, 00:08 Yifes
 
The in game cutscenes are quite obvious, but they're are still miles ahead of what any RTS has ever done. They're like the quality of those found in a good FPS. With so much resources and assets devoted to the single player presentation, I'm actually looking forward to the campaign.  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Free Alien Swarm Release
34. Re: Free Alien Swarm Release Jul 20, 2010, 22:39 Yifes
 
Aero wrote on Jul 20, 2010, 19:08:
That's a fun shooter. Good Stuff.

My first time, in the first mission, I was on the elevator and hit the 'G' key, thinking this was going to launch a grenade or something at all the critters climbing up the shaft, but as it turns out, that is the throw-your-gun-off-the-elevator button. Don't be quick to judge though, it's all just part of the grand strategy, you see.

Melee is fun.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > StarCraft II Performance
33. Re: StarCraft II Performance Jul 20, 2010, 22:17 Yifes
 
*Edit*
Pretty much unnecessary to point out the obvious.
I don't have to edit and fake your posts to make you look like an idiot. Just quoting you does that for me.
This comment was edited on Jul 20, 2010, 22:49.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > StarCraft II Performance
31. Re: StarCraft II Performance Jul 20, 2010, 22:08 Yifes
 
whats that? youll have to speak up, we cant hear you with your head so far up blizzards ass you apologist piece of scum. i think blizzard removed singleplayer, quick yifes to the postmobile, its time to defend their ridiculous actions!

This is consistent with the quality and content of his other posts. Quite a vivid imagination.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > StarCraft II Performance
29. Re: StarCraft II Performance Jul 20, 2010, 21:53 Yifes
 
dont mind yifes, hes a blizz fanboy. look at every sc2 topic and you will see him there defending everything blizz does because hes a chump just waiting to get burned.

Don't mind ThePCWarrior. He's just an idiot who can't muster up a coherent argument. Judging from his liberal usage of terms like "fanboy" and "owning", it's a disgrace he's even associated with PC gaming, as his ilk is more fit bitching about which console is better on youtube.

"Yo dude, you're just a M$ fanboi. PS3 totally OWNZ j00!!!!"

This comment was edited on Jul 20, 2010, 22:02.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > StarCraft II Performance
27. Re: StarCraft II Performance Jul 20, 2010, 13:33 Yifes
 
Nothing to do with net access, I'm just opposed to LAN requiring a net connection. Hence I'll vote with my money, as I have done with any game/service that doesn't do it right in my opinion (IE MW2 with it's P2P crap and Xbox 360 charging for online multiplayer).

Protesting against MW2 is totally different since the lack of dedicated servers and mod support negatively affects everyone who plays multiplayer. With SCII, you and your brother can play just as well together online.

SO now with SCII, you're still going to play it (the single player) anyways, just not pay for it. It seems like a sad excuse to avoid paying for something, especially since the missing feature you're protesting against does not impact on your enjoyment of the game at all 99% of the time.

This comment was edited on Jul 20, 2010, 13:41.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > StarCraft II Performance
26. Re: StarCraft II Performance Jul 20, 2010, 13:26 Yifes
 
Mr. Tact wrote on Jul 20, 2010, 00:32:
Yifes wrote on Jul 19, 2010, 16:23:
If you can win vs 3-4 AI you'd have no problem playing against people in the bronze/silver leagues.
Well, remember -- I'm talking about the AI from the original game. My understanding is the new one is much better, I doubt I could beat it 1 vs 3-4.

I am talking about the old AI. If you can beat the new AI 1v1 on hard then you'd prob do well on Gold. Of course, people online cheese, which can be frustrating the first few times when you don't know how to deal with it.

This comment was edited on Jul 20, 2010, 13:43.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > StarCraft II Performance
21. Re: StarCraft II Performance Jul 19, 2010, 16:36 Yifes
 
I'm going to borrow a friends copy, not interested in the online multi and the lack of lan option (proper lan) means I won't be getting it just for 1v1 with my brother who lives with me (we are both equally awful).

I don't get that. I assume your internet connection can handle a total of 2 people.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > StarCraft II Performance
19. Re: StarCraft II Performance Jul 19, 2010, 16:23 Yifes
 
Mr. Tact wrote on Jul 19, 2010, 12:47:
kanniballl wrote on Jul 19, 2010, 12:33:
However, I don't recall how well I faired against the AI in the original in other maps. It's been way too long since I played a skirmish in that game.
Well, if your experience matched mine, basically unless multiple AI armies attacked in series you could beat them 1 on 3-4. We usually were able to win 2 vs 6 without much trouble -- as long as we had choke points.

If you can win vs 3-4 AI you'd have no problem playing against people in the bronze/silver leagues. Had a few placement matches where my opponents would have like 8 scvs and 2 production buildings all game.

I think most people are just too intimidated by the idea of multiplayer. It's not like you're stepping into the Korean Brood war servers or something.

This comment was edited on Jul 19, 2010, 16:34.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > StarCraft II Beta Ends Tomorrow
23. Re: StarCraft II Beta Ends Tomorrow Jul 18, 2010, 23:14 Yifes
 
Ant wrote on Jul 18, 2010, 23:05:
Yifes wrote on Jul 18, 2010, 22:56:
I wasn't a fan of Warcraft and SC games even for their single players. I am more of a military war games type of fan even if it is futuristic theme.

I don't see SCII's innovations taking it in that direction.

When I think of war games I think turn based tactical games. I don't see how C&C and even World in Conflict fit that bill.
C&C and WiC aren't turn based. They're RTS. I like military theme. I am not saying WC and SC are bad. It is just not a theme I care for. I do love Diablo and WoW though!

I thought you were talking about old school war games like Steel Panthers. But yeah, the theme of Starcraft II isn't going to change. Still space marines with southern accents fighting swarms of zerg (and each other) while the Protoss tries desperately to save the universe.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > StarCraft II Beta Ends Tomorrow
20. Re: StarCraft II Beta Ends Tomorrow Jul 18, 2010, 22:56 Yifes
 
I wasn't a fan of Warcraft and SC games even for their single players. I am more of a military war games type of fan even if it is futuristic theme.

I don't see SCII's innovations taking it in that direction.

When I think of war games I think turn based tactical games. I don't see how C&C and even World in Conflict fit that bill.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > StarCraft II Beta Ends Tomorrow
18. Re: StarCraft II Beta Ends Tomorrow Jul 18, 2010, 22:45 Yifes
 
I did play the beta from end of Februrary 2010. Did the game get a lot better since then? I am not a big Blizzard RTS fan. I only enjoyed World in Conflict, Command & Conquer (C&C) games (not Red Alert/RA 3 and C&C4), etc.

The beta's only the competitive multiplayer aspect of Starcraft. It's the part that's hardest to balance and needs the most testing. It doesn't really reflect on the rest of the game. Since you last played in February, the map editor's been released, and there's a lot of cool custom maps that cater to all types of players. I'd get the game just for the custom maps.

Also, from what I've seen of the campaign, I don't see how it's possible to not enjoy the single player if you like games like C&C and World in conflict. The campaign has some solid variety, and the in-between mission story telling mode is the best I've ever seen from a RTS.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > StarCraft II Beta Ends Tomorrow
16. Re: StarCraft II Beta Ends Tomorrow Jul 18, 2010, 22:37 Yifes
 
Can someone go into detail about differences from the first game? I played the first one briefly and it was an ok game but I wasn't into it. This looks like the same game with updated graphics... what are the major differences? Units, maps, unit abilities, mini map, etc. Is this like counterstrike source where its basically the same thing with some upgraded bells and whistles?

>50% of the units are new.
New in-between mission story mode, told from Jim Raynor's perspective. Wander around your ship, visit planets, talk to people, buy upgrades, select missions, etc. Some minor RPG elements.
Single player only units/upgrades, etc, many returning from Brood War
New graphics/physics engine, lets mapmakers do stuff like flowing lava.
Single challenge missions, meant to teach people skills useful in multiplayer games (like macro/micro).
Multiplayer wise, new matchmaking system, separating players by skill level. Noob friendly multiplayer modes.
Powerful new map editor that lets people make games as diverse as SHMUPs and third person shooters.

And no LAN.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > StarCraft II Pre-Downloads
107. Re: StarCraft II Pre-Downloads Jul 16, 2010, 19:23 Yifes
 
and Yoda is a wise one , so ty next one plz

You're right, I forgot that Yoda was wise. You just have terrible English.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > StarCraft II Pre-Downloads
106. Re: StarCraft II Pre-Downloads Jul 16, 2010, 19:22 Yifes
 
Prez wrote on Jul 16, 2010, 18:46:
Why are we still arguing a point that was made moot when Blizzard very reasonably decided to back off Real ID?

Because some people think it was all a lie. Apparently Blizzard does exactly the opposite of what they say they're going to do, and will force everyone to use Facebook in order to play their games. Similarly, when Blizzard says there'll be no LAN support, it means that there actually will be.

My bad for arguing with idiots over the internet. It's a nasty habit of mine.

This comment was edited on Jul 16, 2010, 19:27.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > StarCraft II Pre-Downloads
104. Re: StarCraft II Pre-Downloads Jul 16, 2010, 19:14 Yifes
 
now now carm down young padawan , your belive in this is strong i see , tho don't let the dark side get you go get some air i think you need it hehe

I knew it. You're Yoda, judging from your terrible English.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Blizzard Real ID FAQ
1. Re: Blizzard Real ID FAQ Jul 16, 2010, 18:17 Yifes
 
"We hope players will find this feature convenient, but it's completely optional. In the long term, we hope to give players who use Facebook some fun, and also optional, ways to share what they're doing in Blizzard games with their friends"
"Blizzard Entertainment does not share any personal information with Facebook as part of this process."

Quoted for emphasis, because a few people around here are morons.

This comment was edited on Jul 16, 2010, 18:34.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
PC Gaming > Blues News Top 3 PC Games of All Time
12. No subject Jul 16, 2010, 17:59 Yifes
 
That's why he asks for your best three.

He asks for that in the post, but the title of the thread is "Top 3 PC Games of All Time." Just clarifying.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > StarCraft II Pre-Downloads
101. Re: StarCraft II Pre-Downloads Jul 16, 2010, 17:32 Yifes
 
so why the f do you think they made a deal with Faceshet? , not to think any kind of faceshet will be implanted is stupid opt yea right till they have sold some of the new games then it will come

CNN.com and 1/2 of the websites on the internet have optional facebook. Bluesnews uses Twitter. You think they all will eventually force you to use facebook/twitter?

Here's the latest Blizz FAQ on RealID, released today:
"We hope players will find this feature convenient, but it's completely optional. In the long term, we hope to give players who use Facebook some fun, and also optional, ways to share what they're doing in Blizzard games with their friends"

http://www.bluesnews.com/s/112239/blizzard-real-id-faq

They have never secretly changed anything, so unless they announce that they plan on making facebook mandatory, you and The PC Warrior are just straight up pulling shit out of your ass.

This comment was edited on Jul 16, 2010, 18:21.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > StarCraft II Pre-Downloads
88. Re: StarCraft II Pre-Downloads Jul 16, 2010, 06:51 Yifes
 
you belive them ? , even after what they tried to sneak in for a couple of weeks ago , ok np .....let peps get our new games and then the deal with faceshet will show its true face , don't you think faceshet is in this deal ohh and the other third compagny , for the money? i do

Faceshet is in tha house and that meens data is on its way out were i don't want it

They didn't try to "sneak" in shit. They tried to make Real Id required to post in forums, and then they backed off. They ANNOUNCED everything that they've tried to do, long before they did it. Real ID is optional and doesn't even require facebook, so why the fuck do you think they will secretly make facebook mandatory? Stupid.

This comment was edited on Jul 16, 2010, 07:13.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
1000 Comments. 50 pages. Viewing page 25.
< Newer [ 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 ] Older >


footer

Blue's News logo