Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
Customize
User Settings
Styles:
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:
Chicago, IL USA, IL 10/19

Regularly scheduled events

User information for SMA

Real Name SMA   
Search for:
 
Sort results:   Ascending Descending
Limit results:
 
 
 
Nickname Scottish Martial Arts
Email Concealed by request
ICQ None given.
Description
Homepage http://
Signed On Jun 16, 2002, 23:16
Total Comments 3214 (Veteran)
User ID 13410
 
User comment history
< Newer [ 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ] Older >


News Comments > Out of the Blue
23. Re: Morning Mobilization Dec 14, 2016, 18:14 Scottish Martial Arts
 
Rigs wrote on Dec 14, 2016, 17:40:
Anyway, you guys know every movie doesn't have to be Oscar-worthy 'Saving Private Ryan' life-changing shit, right?

No, but there's a difference between a popcorn flick with a soul and a popcorn flick that is soulless. The Force Awakens was certainly the former, Rogue One may be the latter if many of the reviews are to be believed.

And I'm pretty sure Saving Private Ryan only won Oscars for sound and special effects. edit: Looks like it got Director and Cinematography too.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Safety Dance
16. Re: Morning Mobilization Dec 14, 2016, 18:06 Scottish Martial Arts
 
Squirmer wrote on Dec 14, 2016, 17:35:
"Act of war"? Put away the nukes. The US government has spied on everyone, it has intervened in so many other countries' elections, it has militarily intervened in so many countries and caused the deaths of countless people. But we're supposed to be outraged by one Russian hack of a political party that had no provable impact?

This is all just distraction stoked by a febrile media and a political party that can't accept it lost. And what's more it's dangerous distraction.

Fair enough on US spying. However, to your second point, while an impact probably cannot be proved, it can certainly be reasonably inferred. Likewise, this is not a distraction and it's not a matter of refusing to accept a loss. Trump is our President for the next 4 years, barring impeachment. He won narrowly, but he won. The question is: what kind of President is he going to be? Is he going to be a President who rejects intelligence out of hand that doesn't flatter his ego? Is he going to be a President who isn't transparent about his financial/business interests and how they entangle with potentially hostile foreign powers? Is his Republican Congressional majority potentially blackmail-able by Russian intelligence (the CIA and FBI maintain that the RNC was penetrated by Russian intelligence too: what kompromat, if any, were they able to glean from those hacks?) Hopefully there's nothing to these concerns, but we won't know unless the Russian intrusions are thoroughly investigated. Perhaps you're satisfied with Trump dismissing this all out of hand, but his business record suggests that those who place their trust in him, and don't insist on up-front accountability, ultimately end up regretting it.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Out of the Blue
15. Re: Morning Mobilization Dec 14, 2016, 16:12 Scottish Martial Arts
 
Which reviews are you guys referring to? From fandom or something? The general impression from the professional critics, e.g. A.O. Scott, etc., is that this is a serviceable piece of entertainment, but lacks any particular reason to recommend it as a film or even to exist aside from printing money for Disney and maintaining popular culture mindshare until Episode 8. The plotting is reportedly contrived, the characters thin, the performances remarkably weak given the otherwise superb cast members, and the pacing is off until the final act.

edit: To be clear, some critics genuinely seem to have enjoyed it, but most seem pretty lukewarm. Some of the reviews which rottentomatoes is scoring as positive, for example, give a much more mixed impression once you actually read the review.

This comment was edited on Dec 14, 2016, 16:19.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Safety Dance
12. Re: Morning Mobilization Dec 14, 2016, 16:07 Scottish Martial Arts
 
I used to hang out on a forum that had a pretty sizeable Russian population, and it was fascinating watching a subset of that population go all in on Putinism over time. Some of the Russian posters maintained a healthy skepticism of their government, were horrified at the assassination of journalists, saw their government's interventions in the "near abroad" as an attempt to distract from economic stagnation and oligarchic cronyism, etc., but others swallowed it hook, line, and sinker. As Timmeh, and others like him, show, that process seems to be happening much faster with the American right-wing and Trumpism. I'd argue with him, but what would be the point? In his world, there are no verifiable facts, reasonable inference is impossible, anything reported in the media is de facto false, and all information is suspect except for the party line of the glorious leader. Why discuss the specific malware that was used in penetrating the DNC and how it was also used in Ukraine and against NATO (gee which foreign actor has this constellation of interests?), or that the hours of illicit network activity overlap exactly with working hours in the Moscow timezone, or that the supposed Romanian leaker Guccifer 2.0 appears to have used an online translator to conduct conversations with the press in "Romanian", or that the phishing link pointed to a server which is known to be used to Russian advanced persistent threats, etc? All of that was reported in the "media" so therefore it cannot have any basis in reality, and therefore the truth of Trump saying it wasn't the Russians is self-evident.

 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Out of the Blue
6. Re: Morning Mobilization Dec 14, 2016, 12:14 Scottish Martial Arts
 
First trailer for Nolan's Dunkirk looks pretty phenomenal: https://youtu.be/F-eMt3SrfFU  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Safety Dance
8. Re: Morning Mobilization Dec 14, 2016, 12:10 Scottish Martial Arts
 
Pigeon wrote on Dec 14, 2016, 11:53:
Burrito of Peace wrote on Dec 14, 2016, 11:28:
I read it and it lines up with what I have suspected all along that we, the US, is on the losing side of the "cyberwar".

Our politicians are too clueless to understand the breadth of the problem, and too willing to use the results for political leverage. Honestly they didn't even need the details, just putting forth a vague implication that wrong doing had occurred based on out of context statements. What was actually the worst thing in those emails? Probably Donna Brazile leaking a debate question to Hillary's aide and that was the least focused on aspect.

Again, I'd highly recommend reading the NYT story: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/13/us/politics/russia-hack-election-dnc.html

The thing that was concerning to me was less the nothingburger email drama -- which as you point out was embarrassing for democrats but hardly criminal -- than the leaking of the DNCs campaign strategy, budgets, personnel assignments, etc. all of which were out their on the internet for the Trump campaign to pick through even if it didn't consume the headlines like John Podesta's email. That's the sort of thing that the Watergate burglars were after and which ended the Nixon presidency. I'm doubtful the Trump campaign was directly coordinating with Russian intelligence, but the fact is they directly benefited from Russian intelligence operations and that the Russians acted as their Gordon Liddy et al.

Again, I'm willing to give Trump the benefit of the doubt and not assume he's been compromised by Russian intelligence, but he needs to put his pride aside and rather than try to deny something that diminishes his victory, instead commit his administration to an investigation of Russian intelligence operations during the election and to an appropriate response, whether it be further economic sanctions on Russia or retaliatory cyberwarfare. If Trump gives Putin a pass on cyberwar against the US, then that pretty much confirms he places his own ego ahead of the national security of the United States.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Safety Dance
5. Re: Morning Mobilization Dec 14, 2016, 11:15 Scottish Martial Arts
 
None of you read the article that was cited in that claim did you? At least no one commented in the relevant thread last night: https://www.bluesnews.com/cgi-bin/board.pl?action=postmessage&boardid=1&threadid=176985

Whether or not the Russian intrusion actually tipped the election, you cannot read the NYT's story from yesterday afternoon documenting the Russian attacks on our political organizations without coming to the conclusion that this was a plausibly deniable act of war.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Evening Metaverse
13. Re: Morning Mobilization Nov 30, 2016, 11:02 Scottish Martial Arts
 
Timmeh wrote on Nov 30, 2016, 10:28:
Conservative Views are not stupid. Neo Liberal views on the other hand are bat shit insane.

You might want to Google Neoliberalism before going on a rant about it. Here's some help: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoliberalism

If you cannot correctly identify what things are even called, it's hard to take your appeals to "reading a lick of real history" seriously.

This comment was edited on Nov 30, 2016, 11:15.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Titanfall 2 Free Trial This Week
1. Re: Morning Mobilization Nov 29, 2016, 21:34 Scottish Martial Arts
 
I picked this up on a whim the other day and have been very pleasantly surprised. If you ever wanted a sequel to Shogo, with some Portal and Call of Duty mixed in for good measure, then this is it.  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Out of the Blue
12. Re: Morning Mobilization Nov 23, 2016, 15:23 Scottish Martial Arts
 
Dacote wrote on Nov 23, 2016, 15:02:
The hair-loss drug is why I'm bald.

Once I saw the WHO hand cleaning method I quit washing my hands.
http://www.who.int/gpsc/clean_hands_protection/en/

The CDC does not go into enough detail. http://www.cdc.gov/features/handwashing/


A man entered a restaurant and sat at the only open table. As he sat down, he knocked the spoon off the table with his elbow. A nearby waiter reached into his shirt pocket, pulled out a clean spoon, and set it on the table. The diner was impressed. "Do all the waiters here carry spoons in their pockets?"

The waiter replied, "Yes. Ever since an Efficiency Expert visited our restaurant... He determined that 17.8% of our diners knock the spoon off the table. By carrying clean spoons with us, we save trips to the kitchen."

The diner ate his meal. As he was paying the waiter, he commented, "Forgive the intrusion, but do you know that you have a string hanging from your fly?"

The waiter replied, "Yes, we all do. Seems that the same Efficiency Expert determined that we spend too much time washing our hands after using the men's room. So, the other end of that string is tied to my penis. When I need to go, I simply pull the string, do my thing, and then return to work. Having never touched myself, there really is no need to wash my hands. Saves a lot of time."

"Wait a minute," said the diner, "how do you get your penis back in your pants?"

"Well, I don't know about the other guys, but I use the spoon."

wtf am i reading
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Tech Bits
23. Re: Morning Mobilization Nov 23, 2016, 15:14 Scottish Martial Arts
 
Muscular Beaver wrote on Nov 23, 2016, 12:48:
Sounds logical. Yet that doesnt mean they werent there before. They just werent as vocal, because of the cancer that is PC.
People need to grow a thicker hide again, that is obvious when you look at what they often call racism or hate crime.
If everyone is that touchy and it would go mainstream even more, we would go into a catastrophe with light speed. History has shown that more than enough times.

The thing about political correctness is that conservatives don't seem to realize that it runs both ways. Just as there are plenty of things which conservatives don't feel that they can say in polite company, there's a lot of stuff liberals and leftists don't feel that they can say either. But everyone agrees to tone it down and not be particularly hateful in their words so that society can somehow continue to shamble along without collapsing in on itself. If conservatives truly hate political correctness, then they don't get to be scandalized when a person of color says "fuck the police" because it's that same political correctness which causes minority communities with bad policing experiences to usually limit their criticism to polite terms. Similarly, if conservative Christians truly hate political correctness, then they, upon calling homosexuality barbaric, don't get to be scandalized when gay people call Christianity a barbaric religion. And so forth.

Contemporary campus politics does, in my opinion, take the idea of political correctness too far: instead of us all having a mutual obligation not to disrespect other groups, campus leftists would instead say that we have no obligation to even hear things we dislike. That's a mistake, but it's no worse a mistake than thinking political correctness is solely something enforced by the left on the right.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Legal Briefs
85. Re: Morning Mobilization Nov 22, 2016, 19:20 Scottish Martial Arts
 
I'm dubious that Sanders would have had much of a shot. You have to remember that he was a total unknown to anyone who didn't pay attention to the Democratic primary, which would constitute most of the country. That would have meant that the GOP and Trump would have able to define him and hit him hard for being a self-described socialist and for having been in Congress for ~25 years with nothing significant to show for it. For example: "He says he's an outsider, but this out of touch Vermont socialist has spent a third of his life in Congress with no major legislative accomplishments. Do you really trust a do-nothing hippie to shake up Washington?" For broad swaths of the country, hearing that someone is a "socialist" is like hearing they eat babies; Bernie would have been demonized to the same degree that Hillary was demonized. Maybe he would have pulled it off, but I have my doubts.  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Metaverse
7. Re: Morning Mobilization Nov 22, 2016, 16:28 Scottish Martial Arts
 
Cutter wrote on Nov 22, 2016, 15:09:
jdreyer wrote on Nov 22, 2016, 13:21:
'Quit Social Media. Your Career May Depend on It.'

Or you could, you know, never start.

Or maybe not obsess on it, or just use an account with a fake name so employers can't spy on you, or work for someone who understands your private life is none of their fucking business to begin with because you're an employee and not property.


Your comment has literally nothing to do with the thrust of the article author's argument. He says absolutely nothing about spying employers; he says quite a bit about concentration being a valuable skill and resource, and that social media is designed to foster compulsive breaks in your concentration.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Legal Briefs
69. Re: Morning Mobilization Nov 22, 2016, 11:58 Scottish Martial Arts
 
Verno wrote on Nov 22, 2016, 10:59:
rethinking international economic policy approaches and moving away from elitism toward populism so that they can get back in power.

See, this is where a fantasy is being sold. US manufacturing output is at record levels, but changes in technology mean that we no longer need record levels of manufacturing workers. Likewise, the coal industry is being decimated simply because there are cheaper alternatives in larger supply. The notion that we're losing out to the Chinese is simply not true: low-skill American workers are instead losing out to advancing technology.

Any politician who appeals to nostalgia for the 1960s industrial economy is lying or is in denial. Going forward we need to be thinking about how to deal with the fact that our economy will continue to produce large quantities of wealth but will not produce large quantities of low-skill middle class jobs. Putting "America First" won't bring back the good jobs that technology has erased from existence, and the problem that the new right-wing Populism will face is that won't be able to deliver on its promises because in its simplistic appeals, it has misdiagnosed the cause of the problem. Aging low-skill blue-color workers really are in a shitty position, and frankly I don't know what the answer is for them, but I can say that trying to turn back the clock is doomed to fail. It's unfortunate, for them, that their new leader can only look backwards and doesn't have any answers for the future.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Legal Briefs
63. Re: Morning Mobilization Nov 22, 2016, 10:12 Scottish Martial Arts
 
Verno wrote on Nov 22, 2016, 09:55:
People mocked Trump's reluctance about accepting the results of the election but now many of the same pundits are making noise about the "popular" vote. To me it doesn't matter, she still lost no matter what. Whether she won the popular the vote by 3 million or 100,000, she lost the election. Frankly I'm not sure I would be so quick to trumpet (no pun intended!) the popular vote results when you look at the sheer amount of media backing and money behind her, I would be embarrassed by her performance. Either way its water under the bridge, shes done and there's no going back so the hand wringing is kind of silly.

I don't think its in the Republicans favor to dismantle the EC when it just won them the election either. Refactoring voting districts on the other hand, I can see that happening.

Speaking only for myself, I don't bring up the popular vote to suggest that Clinton somehow still has a path to the White House. Instead, I bring it up to suggest that Trumpism has a very limited mandate, if any mandate at all. Most discussions of the popular vote I have read usually preface their remarks with something along the lines of "she lost fair and square, and will never become President, but...", so I suspect that few commentators are actually agitating for some sort of different election outcome.

Edit - A representative example of the sort commentary to which I'm referring:

More Americans voted for Hillary Clinton than for Donald Trump. More Americans voted for Democratic Senate candidates than for Republican Senate candidates. And while we donít have final numbers yet, it looks likely that more Americans will have voted for House Democrats than for House Republicans.

So why arenít Democrats acting like it? Why arenít they trying to force Republicans, the media, and the emergent Trump White House to act like it?

This is not an argument that the election was rigged, nor that Trumpís win is somehow illegitimate. The president is chosen by the Electoral College. The Senate is built to favor small states. Gerrymandering is legal. America does not decide national elections by simply tallying up votes.

But the will of the voters still matters, or at least it should...

Democrats have confused the reality of being out of power with the idea of being in the minority. This lets the Trump administration and the Republican Party confuse the reality of being in power with the idea of having a mandate for their agenda.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Legal Briefs
56. Re: Morning Mobilization Nov 21, 2016, 23:22 Scottish Martial Arts
 
Dev wrote on Nov 21, 2016, 22:19:
jdreyer wrote on Nov 21, 2016, 16:22:
And still lost the popular vote by millions.
millionS requires at least two. It's less than that.

There are still several million outstanding votes however, most of them in heavily Clinton leaning areas. Los Angeles County, for example, still has 1 million votes remaining to be counted (at least as of this morning). Most back of the envelope calculations anticipate that Clinton's final vote lead will be in the neighborhood of 2.5-3 million.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Legal Briefs
44. Re: Morning Mobilization Nov 21, 2016, 18:27 Scottish Martial Arts
 
BobBob wrote on Nov 21, 2016, 18:18:
I can feel the normalization coming. Or I'm tired of feeling shocked, scared, and hopeless. I guess I'll just hope the California political force field can hold protect us for 4 years ... or more.

I increasingly suspect that Trump's foreign business entanglements will quickly lead to impeachment. By refusing to divest himself of ownership of his businesses and properties, he is setting his administration up to be in a continual state of conflict of interest. While denied by both, there is reporting today in the Argentine press that Trump and the Argentine President, in a congratulatory phone call for winning the election, discussed permitting issues with a Trump building project in Buenos Aires, which if true is a clear violation of the spirit, if not the letter, of the Emoluments Clause of the US Constitution. If stuff like this keeps coming up -- and Trumps refusal to divest will ensure that it does -- then it will only be a matter of time until Trump does something so egregious that the Congressional GOP will get sick of defending him against corruption charges and invoke articles of impeachment.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Legal Briefs
41. Re: Morning Mobilization Nov 21, 2016, 18:15 Scottish Martial Arts
 
unfortunately wrote on Nov 21, 2016, 17:35:
Good thing would-be's like yourself don't have any real influence. Have you read Madison/Federalist Papers? Do you know what 'tyranny of the majority' is? What the role of the Electoral College is re:same? Or would you like to abrogate well-considered protections simply because you don't favor the result of an election? The daily wall of self-proclaimed pol expert posts on this site is laughable. You may look into some humility- if you do so constructively, perhaps we'll see less pretentious pol narrative nonsense on this gaming website.


Ironic that you would cite Madison and the Federalist Papers considering that the therein stated purpose of the Electoral College was to safeguard the republic from the people choosing a demagogue or foreign pawn as their leader. By letting Electors, themselves chosen by state legislatures, choose the President, wiser and cooler heads would be allowed to prevail over an impassioned yet misguided majority. The Framers wanted the people to have a voice, but not too much of a voice, lest too much democracy lead to a democratic government tearing itself apart, as it had in the past.

The Electoral College as it exists today is a bit of an oddity, because the system has evolved such that the Electors are no longer the wiser men selected by state legislatures, but simple partisan loyalists, performing a purely ceremonial function, selected by the outcome of 50 separate statewide contests. In effect, we no longer have the safeguards against an unfit leader assuming the Presidency -- otherwise we'd be hearing a lot more about Electors planning to deny Trump a majority so that the Presidency will go to the House for selection of a more mainstream GOP politician -- and yet we don't have a purely democratic system either, as evidenced by Clinton's 1.6 million, and growing, lead in the nationwide popular vote.

I say if we're going to have an Electoral College, go all in and return Elector selection to the state legislatures. That would keep the Presidency in GOP hands for the foreseeable future, but on the other hand it would keep an incompetent demagogue from ever assuming the highest office. We'd also likely see much shorter and less expensive campaigns, since the "campaign" would mostly occur entirely inside state legislatures.

The Framers were terrified that the people couldn't be trusted to govern themselves responsibly; 2016 and Donald Trump seem to have proven them right.

This comment was edited on Nov 21, 2016, 18:20.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Mobilization
4. Re: Morning Mobilization Nov 21, 2016, 11:53 Scottish Martial Arts
 
ItBurn wrote on Nov 21, 2016, 10:47:
I never use apps like the Facebook app or the Youtube app for example. Their websites work great on phones and are full featured. Why would I waste space, cpu, battery and start time with these apps?

A native app gets direct access to system services and has fewer limitations on computing resources and the like. Consequently, a well designed and well optimized native app can offer more features and better performance. However, in most cases a mobile-optimized web app will be "good enough", and likewise assuming that the native app is "well designed and well optimized" is a big jump. Really it's a case by case thing: does the native app offer advantages over the web app? In some cases the answer will be yes, in others no.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Saturday Mobilization
4. Re: Morning Mobilization Nov 20, 2016, 13:39 Scottish Martial Arts
 
NetHead wrote on Nov 20, 2016, 10:57:
I never understood what people or companies expected from "wearables".

One device (interface/display size allowing) can do everything. So what exactly do they expect the second, third etc devices to be doing.

The short answer is additional sensors.

Consider the GPS on your phone: it's an input source which your desktop PC does not have, and consequently there's a whole host of things which your phone can do which your PC cannot. We're used to thinking of human computer interaction in terms of input devices such as keyboards and mice, but with sensors you get automated input that doesn't directly depend on you doing anything. Wearables at least have the potential to support computer interaction that otherwise isn't possible right now. However, in order to realize those possibilities you need to think less in terms of a screen you explicitly interact with and more in terms of having a computer seamlessly support your daily activities with minimal direct interaction on your part. So far the only genuinely useful application to emerge is fitness and activity tracking but that doesn't mean this is a dead end. It just means there's no killer app yet. Clothing with temperature regulation or augmented reality contact lenses are all possibilities over the course of our lifetimes.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
3214 Comments. 161 pages. Viewing page 11.
< Newer [ 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ] Older >


footer

Blue's News logo