Beamer wrote on Sep 2, 2019, 00:41:

NotOneOfUs wrote on Sep 1, 2019, 21:38:

Beamer wrote on Sep 1, 2019, 21:21:
No one here seemed to be too upset when Weinstein got destroyed.

Because Ambra Gutierrez worked with the police to obtain this thing called "evidence." This evidence was made public and gave enormous credibility to other accusations.

I have seen enough of false accusations resulting in destroyed careers and lives. I'm at the point of "put up or shut up." If you don't want to pursue the difficulty of gathering something concrete on your aggressor, then I have no inclination to believe you, and will treat any unsubstantiated accusation as, at best, not worthwhile of being given attention.

These things were said about Weinstein for decades. Had it been taken more seriously, maybe it could have been avoided for some.

Meanwhile, again, all you people making this political fail to offer what evidence can be given. Even for rape. What evidence do you think there is after a rape?

"We need evidence," they cry, though they can't offer hypothetical evidence and have clearly never followed an actual rape trial.

Beamer wrote on Sep 1, 2019, 21:21:
No one here seemed to be too upset when Weinstein got destroyed.

Beamer wrote on Sep 1, 2019, 19:42:

NKD wrote on Sep 1, 2019, 19:28:

Cutter wrote on Sep 1, 2019, 19:19:

So, you're perfectly fine with someone accusing you of being a pedophile in that case. You're not worried about the repercussions because it's not true, right? Try thinking these things through first, sport.

How do you suggest someone stop them from doing that?

Slander and libel laws. Which, incidentally, we have.

RedEye9 wrote on Sep 1, 2019, 18:24:

NotOneOfUs wrote on Sep 1, 2019, 18:09:

Sepharo wrote on Sep 1, 2019, 16:35:

Cutter wrote on Sep 1, 2019, 16:32:
...

What an incredibly dumb idea.

This comment has already been reported.

smh

RedEye9 wrote on Aug 17, 2019, 15:26:

NotOneOfUs wrote on Aug 17, 2019, 14:19:

RedEye9 wrote on Aug 17, 2019, 12:20:

Beamer wrote on Aug 17, 2019, 11:59:
One angry gamer is a gamergate specific media outlet. It's also rampant homophobia, misogyny, and racism. It's the most pure example of gamergate out there.

Beamer, once they drink the poisoned koolaid it's impossible to coax them out of the sewer. But thanks for trying.

The cultists claiming others are the cultists.

Hoo boy, I look forward to the coming civil war~

I rest my case.

RedEye9 wrote on Aug 17, 2019, 12:20:

Beamer wrote on Aug 17, 2019, 11:59:
One angry gamer is a gamergate specific media outlet. It's also rampant homophobia, misogyny, and racism. It's the most pure example of gamergate out there.

Beamer, once they drink the poisoned koolaid it's impossible to coax them out of the sewer. But thanks for trying.

Beamer wrote on Aug 16, 2019, 18:40:

NotOneOfUs wrote on Aug 16, 2019, 16:54:

RedEye9 wrote on Aug 16, 2019, 16:22:
Gamergate is exactly what it appears to be: a relatively small and very loud group of video game enthusiasts who claim that their goal is to audit ethics in the gaming-industrial complex and who are instead defined by the campaigns of criminal harassment that some of them have carried out against several women.

You got a single fact to back that up?

Kotakuinaction