Vall Forran wrote on Oct 11, 2016, 02:58:
Meh, never expected it to come out this year anyway. The stuff they are demo-ing shows progress. Derek Smart would've released a broken game by now and spend all his time arguing that you're just playing it wrong and it works on his computer and he's god and he's the best developer and he has the best judgement and "Gina".
MoreLuckThanSkill wrote on Sep 12, 2016, 12:02:
Looks pretty good, I think you guys a nitpicking a bit much. The first one was low budget and ended up being entertaining, this looks like a better version of the first game, ie. ideal sequel.
I doubt I'll preorder, but I'll get it on sale at some point.
Muscular Beaver's 'equally loud sounds' comment is fair, the first game sort of had the same issue, if I recall. Didn't make it unplayable though.
MoreLuckThanSkill wrote on Sep 11, 2016, 15:45:
Dead Space 3, how were you so terrible?
Creston wrote on Sep 8, 2016, 13:24:VaranDragon wrote on Sep 8, 2016, 11:39:
21 hours from start to finish, including the side missions.
Do you people literally just run from one mission to the next and do nothing else whatsoever???
I'm 45 hours in and just made it to the GARM base.
Vall Forran wrote on Aug 25, 2016, 22:55:
Is it good? I'm curious. I've heard weird design decisions have been made that made the game not fun.
Moog wrote on Jul 11, 2016, 10:01:
Still can't believe they released JC3 without MP/co-op support... JC2 was just crying out for it.
I got bored of JC3 after 13h.
If it had had MP/CO-OP, I'd still be playing it!
Won't be buying JC4 without co-op at launch!
Wetworks wrote on May 24, 2016, 22:12:
The 26 min let's play video of Alani shows exactly why I enjoy Battleborn so much more than Overwatch. Overwatch is fun in short bursts, but like bubblegum the lack of progression and complexity leaves me sated after a few matches.
Battleborn is just so much more complex, meaningful account and character progression, gear farming and selection, mutation unlocks, leveling up during the match, multiple objectives on the map, 30 minute matches, PvE and PvP content, actually unique and different gameplay modes, etc...
Steam shows I have 2 hrs in TF2 and I have 220 hrs in Planetside 2. I just like deeper games.
Osc8r wrote on May 3, 2016, 21:04:
That was epic!
Really enjoyed first two, so looking forward to this. They better bring back the awesome co-op campaign gameplay though.
Beamer wrote on May 2, 2016, 10:11:Task wrote on May 2, 2016, 09:51:
Perhaps, but a 2142 sequel would have better MP mayhem with huge maps and vehicles. CoD 2142 would obviously have the single player campaign edge however, since DICEs SPs are very Poo.
SP is the weak point of CoD.
Angrius Maximis wrote on Apr 28, 2016, 16:39:
overhyped Indie garbage
Tachikoma wrote on Apr 27, 2016, 02:32:
So this is one genuinely promising FPS on the horizon, but nobody`s interested. Let`s wait for another Doom-bashing thread instead, shall we.
deqer wrote on Apr 25, 2016, 11:12:
But... why would you play this when we have Overwatch and Overwatch is going to stomp this game just like it will stomp TF2.