Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
User Settings
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:
Germany 08/31
Chicago, IL USA, IL 10/19

Regularly scheduled events

User information for Thomas

Real Name Thomas   
Search for:
Sort results:   Ascending Descending
Limit results:
Nickname None given.
ICQ 2145056
Homepage http://
Signed On Sep 18, 2001, 21:13
Total Comments 2 (Suspect)
User ID 11031
User comment history
< Newer [ 1 ] Older >

News Comments > More on the WTC Disaster (Updated)
647. Feel free to correct me. Sep 18, 2001, 19:05 Thomas

Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > More on the WTC Disaster (Updated)
643. First post Sep 18, 2001, 17:18 Thomas
What should Bush do? He got about four choices...

First he could do nothing. He could just improve the US safety and leave this incident alone, simply because he has no concrete target. Nobody know if it is Osama bin Laden and nobody want a war. Choosing to do nothing will change the image of US to a weak country.

Second he could say it is Osama bin Laden(since we don't have other known target) and could try to get him throught diplomacy. However do you really believe someone like Osama bin Laden will surrender? There is no way on earth he will, since he knows he will get killed by "accident", or will get to face an one-side jury.

Third Bush could go for a quick war: Atomic bomb? Neutron bomb... which a lot of American want. It is obvious... it is the US policy... it is an eye for an eye, blood for blood. Now this idea will killed more than one innocent person. He will destroy the ecology of the country, and I strongly believe no country on earth will support US after that.

Fourth, Bush could decide to attack strategic targets. That sounds much better than the 3rd option. But what are you going to target? Military bases? Done by the soviet. Some suspect buildings? Done already. Schools? Done too. Actually Afghanistan is a very poor country. There are not much left to destroy but rocks or cheap houses. Would you waste a few rockets that cost thousand $$ to destroy a $10 house? Well we are right now wasting money by using the most high tech equipment, and by moving troops around for a possible war. We are really using the best equipement and probably everybody is laughing at us. Who will send an invisible to radar jet to a country that don't even have a radar? Who will send some troops to a country you don't even know, against some people who have nothing to lose and have many years of experience in war. The Soviet and the English people tried to beat them. They lost! And now I keep on hearing that people want revenge. All you will get is a lot of blood on both sides, a lot of money wasted to get or kill one guy, and US will get a very bad image from the rest of the world. Not only we are already appearing to the world as the fat guy who go to the Burger King everyday, but we are on top arrogant and stupid. This solution is completly worthless but it looks like most people I read about believe in(

Account: yes4me banned by some extremists in the

Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
2 Comments. 1 pages. Viewing page 1.
< Newer [ 1 ] Older >


Blue's News logo