Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
Customize
User Settings
Styles:
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:

Regularly scheduled events

Op Ed

Ars Technica - Blizzard admits Diablo III is a game that ends.
Just how long should players expect a game to remain fresh and exciting? Do publishers have to treat all AAA games as services that keep us constantly entertained for years or even decades? Have MMOs trained us to feel entitled to games that never actually end? These are the questions that have been circling my head after reading Blizzard's response to player complaints about the lack of compelling "endgame" content in Diablo III.

Shacknews.com - Diablo 3's poorly planned end-game.
It's a shame that a company with Blizzard's pedigree couldn't have foreseen the monotony and disillusionment that could creep in less then two months after the game's release. Blizzard has some good storytellers and a fantastic animation staff. Something as intriguing as Halo 4's planned Spartan Ops episodic content would have been enough to keep me engrossed until the inevitable expansion, even if it was every month instead of every week.

In the end, I guess, players with the same mentality as die-hard MMO players will continue to populate the Diablo III servers. Diablo III was an enjoyable game for the first 80 hours.

Email Digg Facebook Twitter   Share More    


 

  
   Current Headlines
Steam Discovery Update
PAC-MAN Championship Edition DX+ Free Week on Steam
Assassin's Creed Unity Season Pass Includes 2.5D AC Game
Supreme Ruler Ultimate Early Access
Big Pharma Announced
Free Tropico 3
On Sale
Evening Crowdfunding Roundup
Evening Previews
Evening Consolidation
Evening Mobilization
Evening Metaverse
Evening Safety Dance
Evening Legal Briefs
etc., etc.
Into the Black
PC GTA5 First-Person Support?
Dark Souls II DLC Delay
Dragon Ball Xenoverse PC Plans
U.K. Sales Charts
  

 



footer

Blue's News logo