From:
Crass
Subject: A Tribes 2 question
Just throwing something
out here...
I read that recent Tribes
2 interview over at pc.ign, and while most of it was copy protection
and other such things, one thing rubbed me in a very wrong way - registering
your name. Does anyone else find this absurd?
The deal is, you register
the name you wish to use, and only you are allowed to use that name,
no one else can go by that name. Sounds kind of interesting at first,
eh? You having your own unique identity seems kind of nice, only one
"superdude" [as an example] out fragging, it's just you, no
one else has the same name.
As I read it, this stems
from the notion that, instead of servers only being able to ban IP's
[which can change], they are able to ban unique nicks instead, thus
making sure that an offensive player won't bother them again. But this
is also possible by banning the offensive player's account.
I thought that was quite
a novel idea at first, and then I wondered, what if someone registers
the name I want first? Tough luck, huh? Okay, maybe I can go by s00perd00d,
or superd00d!, or perhaps sup3rd00d or other such nonsense. But why
the hell should I change the nick I want to use just because someone
else beat me to the punch?
I don't know about everyone
else, but I've never run into anyone using the same nick as my own,
and I doubt I ever will. So why should I care if someone has the same
nick as me? I realize that this is a result of admins wanting more power
when kicking offensive players, but will kicking individual names help
any? I imagine the following scenario would be the norm..
>evil superdude is causing
trouble
>Admin X kicks the nick superdude
>superdude then creates the name ultrasuperdude and goes back to
being
>a jerk
>Admin X then bans superdude's account, and they never hear from
>him/her/it again
So, if the most effective
way of eliminating offensive players is to ban their account and not
their nick, why bother registering nicks? I just find the idea of registering
names ludicrous, it's like saying that only one person in the whole
world can be called John.
I really hope I read that
wrong.
--Crass
That's similar to what
id planned for the original QuakeWorld...it was a specacular failure,
if I remember correctly. But things have come a long way, and it might
be possible to actually do right now.